|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Odessosky www.juzaphoto.com/p/Odessosky ![]() |
![]() | Canon 1DX Pros: Sturdy, well, tropical colors made good system focusing powerful (but complicated), reach speeds elevata.rnpuò iso very high producing enough recoverable files such as photos for publishing. Cons: heavy, expensive, noisy, I would say, the shutter and pecchio produce a vibration in the room that you hear. Opinion: is definitely a professional machine that I aimed for over a year, looking between the equipment but then I got a 7d nuova.rnavevo I thought was a great camera and now I realize what it means to FF sensor, the yield is much better but anyway ... not worth all that money. I'd say € 6000.00 are far too many for the photos that produces that fail then both those produced by other lower-end machines or less costose.rnSulla history of high iso would have a little something to say because the file by comparing the 7D with those of 1Dx there is a difference of a little more than a stop sign, ie: 12800 in the 1DX has the same noise of the 7D at around 4000/5000, then you can climb up to that level yet, but the difference is that; iso to lower the quality and close to the other. sent on September 05, 2014 |
![]() | Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM II Pros: robust, reliable, well-tropical conditions in the fast focus, excellent quality lenses and ommagini. Cons: 24-70 focal unhelpful. Opinion: I finally got it. and now I'm aprezzandone all his professionalism. but I remain of the opinion that the CANON little strives to put out innovative objectives, the technology allows it. In my opinion 24-70 is a little voice utile.rntroppo high to be a true wide angle, too low for ritratti.rnUn little effort on the part of CANON, just saw the price affordable, white aluminum barrel, focal length 17 - 85/90 would have been stabilized and the objective best-selling mondo.rnMa CANON fails to rinnovarsi.continuano to throw out things already obsolete at the start. sent on July 28, 2014 |
![]() | Canon 7D Pros: The price, absolute strength, professional features, the shutter speed Cons: Like all APSC rather dense there is a bit of noise at high iso, but satisfactory, Opinion: I have this machine for a short time and I have not found defects. However, it is very sturdy and tropical climates with magnesium chassis, so it is wrong on the card that puts a no tropicalizzata.È in a car made for sports and action and environments estremi.rnIo the accompany with a lens worthy of note The Canon L-series 28 300 IS. I do not know if I would change with a 35mm, you have to go on the high end. sent on August 11, 2013 |
![]() | Canon MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1-5x Macro Pros: is definitely a Macro with a capital M, stuff from CSY Cons: very heavy, very short depth of 1/2 mm to 4 mm with focal fully closed to 16, requires too much light, the focus trope is especially close with 3x 4x 5x magnification type, if you mount a ring flash there ' is room to move. Opinion: I do not know how to judge it, I took this lens to start with the macro, but ... is not a lens to start, no not really. E 'extremely difficult to use I wonder how they managed to make the photos published in this review, especially to insects that do not stand still, even I read freehand with Focal 2.8, there is something not quite right because the depth is less than 1mm. rnSpiegatemi! sent on July 23, 2013 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me