|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Fabio Usvardi www.juzaphoto.com/p/FabioUsvardi  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM II Pros: Great compromise for optical quality, weight and size Cons: Heavier than the previous model, fixed tripod collar Opinion: It's the lens I missed. Thanks to its lighterness and smaller dimensions, I can leave the 400DOIS II home without too much regrets in the most demanding hikes. The new 100-400 IS II is silent, crisp, has a fast AF and an effective stabilizer. I was pleasantly surprised to be multiplied by the Canon EF 1.4-III extender as the AF speed remains good, the image quality is very small and my 5DIV keeps all active AF points. In my case, they are small: 1) The weight has increased compared to the previous model and, in certain situations, 150 / 200gr. in less they would do it. rn2) The tripod collar is fixed and adopts once again a small bracket that is uncomfortable to handle for a long time. I immediately replaced it with a slightly longer after-market leg and already equipped with RRS / Arca Swiss Attachment, so I do not have to use additional plates. sent on November 05, 2017 |
 | Manfrotto BeFree Carbon Pros: Incredibly lightweight, size, material quality Cons: small and improved ball head, high price, last section of very thin legs Opinion: Purchased only for demanding hiking trips in the mountains to photograph wildlife, birdlife and some alpine scenery. By the time I dreamed of completing an ultralight kit and lacking a tripod suited to the purpose. My choice has fallen on Manfrotto BeFree Carbon, well knowing and appreciating the quality of this brand and its products. I preferred to replace the small original ball head with a Feisol CB-30D (ArcaSwiss compatible) that offers, on paper, a double capacity (8kg) and has only slightly higher dimensions than the standard one. In return for a greater degree, I had to sacrifice about 100gr. weight and accept the fact that Manfrotto BeFree does not close completely. In fact, while 2 legs adhere perfectly to the central column, the third leg inevitably touches the plate of the new head (thick about 1cm.) And remains slightly open. This does not hurt transportability, but it's fair to report it. With the new head, the Manfrotto BeFree Carbon also reliably supports the Canon 70-200 f2.8 IS II + Canon 5DIV without showing the slightest sign of failure (but I have already used it with Tamron 150-600 G2, and Canon EF400DOII) ;-) sent on September 28, 2017 |
 | Canon 200D Pros: Fluidity and response of the touchscreen, touchable touch monitor, compact size, image quality, improved ergonomics, value for money / performance. Cons: Poor buffer, only 9 AF points (Optical Viewfinder) Opinion: I bought this machine to replace the EOS100D. The 200D has 100D only the compact dimensions and the 9 AF points (optical viewfinder only) but, for the rest, it's a totally new machine.rnThe design quality and the ' assembling are great for an entry level of this price. The body now offers a more pronounced handle with the classic rubber coating of larger size reflexes, resulting in improved grip. The touch is less "plasticised" and more solid than 100D.rn. • The 200D adopts the latest 24.2MPX Apsc sensor (same as mounted on 80D); therefore, as ISO and IQ holdings we are at very high levels since it is at the moment the best Apsc Canon sensor. Compared to the old 18mpx, I confirm there is a noticeable improvement in high ISO holding. The images have a finer and homogeneous grain, and are easier to process in post-production. Shots can be used up to 1600 iso, but thereyou can also push it to 3200/6400 iso (if properly exposed and without heavy recovery) but you need to resize them to decrease digital noise. As for the famous "dynamic range" (which I use with a lot of parsimony, especially on an APSC sensor), I must say that recovery on shadows and blacks is very good. On the other hand, I find it very easy to "burn" the high lights and when this happens, the recovery becomes impossible.rn • The AF from the optical viewfinder is precise and responsive, and I find it better than the 100D.rn as in the model previous, even the 200D is penalized by only 9 AF points (by optical viewfinder). The points become 49 in LV.rn mode. As for the touch screen, I have to say that I have quickly adapted to using the commands in this mode as well as navigating faster within the menu. Always talking about menus, you can now choose between two types of navigation: rn "Mode%3B wizard "with wizard information that appears on every screen and rn" Standard Mode "the classic one that we find on the other EOS.rnThe touch screen is fast in scrolling and precise in touch response. Rn MAF with touchscreen is ideal for resuming static subjects , so I can focus on the desired detail.For moving subjects I have not used it yet ... I'm going to complete the review as soon as I can test it for good It's very positive that the touch does not trigger micromax, as opposed to the pressure on the shutter button. I tried to shoot with very long shutter speeds (even more than 10 inches), resulting in excellent sharpness results. No Front / Back Focus problem with proprietary optics (EF and EF-S), or third-party (Sigma 180mm f / 2.8 macro and Tamron 15 / 30mm f2.8). Only with the Tamron 150-600mm G2 I had to fix (by dock) a light front fo cus by adjusting the lens to -4rn • rnCon l%26 # 39; adoption of the new Digic 7 processor, I would have expected to find a better buffer ... rnScatting in Raw or Raw + Jpeg L, you can make 5 shots with a rapid burst, then the buffer stops suddenly several seconds. This is done to allow you to write files you just captured on the memory card. In certain circumstances, it will definitely turn into a limit ... shame, because even just 2-3 more Raw, and a faster writing time, could have made a difference. The situation improves by jumping into Jpeg (L). In this regard, I suggest that you pay attention to the memory card's choice, as performance can vary considerably. After trying out several cards, the one that gave me the best results was the Sandisk Extreme PRO 32GB 95MB / s class 10 / U3 / V30. rnInternet you will find several comparative tests and almost all confirm the superior performance of this card. rn • The battery life (LP-E17) is good andnow allows you to get a fair amount of shots, in line with other larger Dslrs. rnCanon declares 840 optical viewpoints and 290 with LV, and I can confirm that it is fairly reliable. rnThe reflex can not be reloaded via USB ... now it is understood that Canon has no interest in implementing this useful feature.rn • rnSe you you liked the 100D, the 200D will not disappoint you, indeed ... it will not bother you even the upper Apsc reflexes, because the small EOS will allow you to get the same image quality. Of course, you have to accept the compromise of having only 9 AF points as a viewfinder, but if you use only one active AF point in 99% of the situations (I do not like AF mode ...), you will get used to it quickly you will forgive this limitation.rnThe compact size and lightness, the touchscreen swivel monitor, a valued and modern 24.2mpx sensor, an infinite optical park, connectsWi-Fi and much more ... at a lower price than a mid / high bandwidth smartphone. What do you want more ?? ;) sent on August 11, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 400mm f/4 DO IS II Pros: Weight & dimensions, fast AF, stabilization, no AC, backlight resistance, extended series III extender, sharpness already in TA Cons: High, slightly unbalanced low price with a Canon 1 Series body Opinion: I suggest that before I write my impressions, I deliberately took time to test and try to get to know this magnificent optic better. Canon did a work, removing alibi and apologies to those who criticized the previous model for low backlighting, AC , Microcontroller, etc. I'm just starting to talk about clarity: the 400 DO Series II has reached levels close to Canon's other Series II supertels, delivering great images that are already fully open. For me it was a great surprise, especially if used with series III multipliers. The Digital Picture.com test (which, at the moment, I think is the most reliable for testing and method), shows a slight (slightly) lower clarity To 300 F2.8 II and 500 f4 II, to the most open diaphragms; Starting to close this difference, it shrinks, but it is still less clear than the other II series. However, we are only thinking on the basis of a visual evaluation of 100% crops, taken from studio shots and in optimum light conditions. Needless to say, such cThey will never be seen in nature. Therefore, these minimum differences will be more influenced by the photographer's ability and experience and the reflex used (if FF or APSC), which compared the quality of optical optics. Rn Despite the work done by Canon, 400 DO II pays, At least for now, the clutch of a series of prejudices (overwhelmed by the internet), linked to small flaws that characterized the first version. Nothing serious and / or unsurpassed, if you have the experience, the passion and the desire to take. RnNot to say that those that were defined as the "weaknesses" of the previous model were completely solved in this second version. Rn The chromatic aberration is non-existent. You notice a slight vignetting only to TA, but it is not at all annoying. RnThe backlighting is, in my opinion, great. RnThe AF speed is really impressive (as in the first version, the rest), especially if you are using itThis optics with latest generation reflexes (7DII, 5DIII, 1DX and latest models). Even by mounting the new series III extender, the AF remains fast. Only with 2X III extender the slowdown is more apparent, but the speed remains, however, at very good levels. The latest generation stabilization allows you to shoot free-hand with unmanageable times for a 400 mm focal length. There are 3 stabilization modes, as well as all other Series II telephoto lenses. The price is high, but in line with the other "whites" and is positioned between the 300 f2.8 and the 500 f4 series II. In conclusion: if you have the clear ideas and are looking for a lightweight, versatile, portable, high quality telephoto lens, and you think the 400mm focal point is a good compromise, the 400 DO II has no rivals on the market. Detail in crop100%, if you want f2.8 because otherwise it's dark if you need 100mm more because otherwise you are coRti ,,,, in short, if you are undecided, maybe it is best to bet on the 300 f2.8 series II or 500 f4 series II.rn - PS: I come from a 500mm f4 IS USM (Series I) and I do not feel the lack ! sent on April 21, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
