|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
El Gnomo87 www.juzaphoto.com/p/ElGnomo87 ![]() |
![]() | Tamron 15-30mm f/2.8 VC USD Pros: Solid construction, sharpness, VC, value for money Cons: Nobody Opinion: Taken for a few months to use on d800 I was fully satisfied. Aesthetically I like it very much, at the first contact in the hand you immediately feel its good solidity, the gravels are quite fluid and precise and using it with care not even the protruding aspheric front lens puts too much "anxiety". The weight is quite important but it goes hand in hand with its really impressive sharpness in the center, slightly less sharp at the edges but I would say that it is so minimal the thing that you do not even notice it. Autofocus is very fast and precise and although the focus is quite short I do not deny that often the VC is useful and does its job in a very good way allowing even freehand shots at 1/10 without problems of chore or micro moved. and on d800 this is a success I would say :D You can only use it with holder and 150x150 slab filters that cost a lot, but I wouldn't define it as a problem this, since when you take this lens you put this in quote too, otherwise you change pattern by veering on lenses that can mount screw filters. The value for money I think is exceptional by placing this lens among the best widecorners now on the market on par with brands and lenses that are much more embossed. sent on December 17, 2019 |
![]() | Nikon D500 Pros: Aesthetically beautiful, robust body, amazing AF, buffer and burst, excellent overall yield, joystick Cons: Balancing not always optimal Opinion: Just taken in hand the first thing that stands out is the body beautiful aesthetically, solid as only Nikon can do, and the keys all put there in their place, just where they must be, with the gem of the backlit keys that are really comfortable. The autofocus is something wonderful, precise and almost infallible. Buffer and burst seem endless and the performance of the sensor are excellent although not comparable in full to an FX. Excellent ISO seal up to 1600, up to 3200 exposing well you still get good results, from 6400 up you take home the shot but without too many pretensions. To be a DX case but them really worth all the money spent. The only flaw is the light meter not always accurate, and maybe even the lack of a built-in flash, not essential, but sometimes would be convenient. sent on December 16, 2018 |
![]() | Sigma 85mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Extreme sharpness - construction - price Cons: Af not always accurate - weight - not tropicalized Opinion: Optics taken about a couple of months. At first glimpse one can not notice the construction, really solid, and very beautifully aesthetically though bulky enough and heavy, but I do not find such a serious defect, instead of the lack of tropicalization since it is still a lens Of 1200 euros. Trying to glide at the eye, the excellent clarity, at f1.4 is remarkable, from f2 onwards "really breaks the hair". The 3d stack is remarkable and it's never too soft (I do not know if it's a good one). Real colors and cremosoanche bokeh if they personally do not make me crazy, I'm not saying it's a flaw, but give me the impression of being too "digitized ", Nothing" fairy "for a portrait optician, little" emotional ". The Af as a whole Art series sometimes goes into crisis by mistake the MAF and especially in the "heavy" backlash it struggles to hook up. I steal heavily on the Nikon d750 .. very uncertain sometimes on the D800 ... paradoxically on the D700 I found it almost impeccable in overall performance. PersonsIf I had to go back two months ago, I think I would take the Nikon 85 f1.4 D, although not having those image quality levels of art has much more personality. In conclusion ... if you are looking for a lens that perfectly covers the exaggerated resolution of the new sensors giving you the utmost clarity, this 85 art is the perfect lens, but if you are looking for a lens with a more personal and personal character that delivers more exciting portraits, Look elsewhere .. sent on July 19, 2017 |
![]() | Nikon D7200 Pros: compact but solid body as usual Nikon, Great display, Tenuta ISO very good, really good dynamic range, AF always accurate and very sensitive Cons: Unremarkable maybe sometimes it puts a little too much to work out if you shoot in RAW burst and Opinion: Caught up in about a month to complement the D800 and use it mainly for photographic hunting, he immediately impressed me positively to clean files and workability in pp shooting in RAW. The camera body is compact but the touch is very solid and sturdy with controls that are right where they should essere..La at high ISO estate is very good and allows you to shoot up to 6400 iSO and get excellent post production files .. to 12800 ISO the noise is c, so, they are still useable if the occasion requires it to use and you can not help it. The machine's customizations are really many and the AF module is a guarantee, is always quick and precise, a little less when used in 3D mode but remains very valid. The barrage is very good and I find it very useful to 1.3x crop mode in the room even if shooting in burst if not using a good memory card processor takes a long time but nothing compared to the D7100 and for that reason it was really annoying. Finally in my opinion it is a very good butg s also in relation to the cost, really offers and has very few flaws more and if you do not have pretensions to PRO but in that case you should orient on many other bodies with very different costi..In relation to WiFi and video mode I do not comment because I do not make videos and do not buy a machine for the wireless mode which can also be handy but is not necessary for me. sent on April 13, 2016 |
![]() | Nikon AF 80-200 f/2.8 ED D Pros: Color and sharpness ... ... Construction of Focus creamy and beautiful ... Cost ... It 'a PRO Cons: Nothing rilevante..forse a tad noisy .. Opinion: Optics I fell in love ... I love just proven that the portraits are offering a mix of creamy pastel colors and high sharpness already at f2.8 ... At the beginning it was very easy to manage on my D800 but once the right confidence you may not remove more by reflex .. Pastel colors worthy of the best Nikon lenses of the past (personally I prefer them to the current) high color rendering and very blurred by fear make it a perspective of absolute value. I was lucky enough to get one (at a fair price by a very proper) almost like new without the classic problem of F / B focus. Raising some iso when there is little light does not feel the need of VR and personally I do not find the AF slow (maybe a bit noisy) .. anzi..ho tried lens AF-S much worse. I use it for portraits and landscapes of D800 and sports photos and fauna of D300s and I was never disappointed. sent on September 11, 2015 |
![]() | Nikon AF-S 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Sharpness up to 200mm VR excellent .. always ready and accurate ... cost is not excessive Cons: It loses a little bit after the 200mm both in quality and brightness Opinion: 70 300 This was my first zoom ... (or as I call it 105-450 when used on a DX sensor) .. for me it's a great zoom always very precise thanks to a nearly flawless VR and quality (up to 200mm) excellent ... Over 200 loses a little something in the quality and brightness ... The weight despite many covers focal lengths, is not excessive and the cost is affordable for those who want a great zoom without spending a fortune ..! ! Maybe a little flaw in focus that is sometimes a bit too "dry and hard." RNA I think a lens to always have in your bag when you're on you face and to never sell ... at least that there is no thinking about the 70 200 f2.8 with a teleconverter nice: D sent on October 23, 2013 |
![]() | Nikon D5100 Pros: Good and excellent image sensor, 16.2MP, swiveling display very handy in some situations, weight and size, you plasticona but good quality, battery (if you do not use live view) ... Cons: The absence of some key you could use, even in "silent shutter" shutter noise is not very pleasant, 11 points of focus are sometimes Pochini .. Opinion: Squeezed for good ... after my D5100 (first reflex for me) I decided to give an opinion on the car .. at first glance perhaps having it in your hand you have the impression of not having a "professional car" with excellent performance for its size you want for the lack of some key in more than would have been useful .. in fact it is so, it is not a professional machine, but great satisfaction ... the sensor electronics el inherited from the D7000 photos can be taken really good big sister with the opportunity to work with ISO high enough with a good yield (up to 1600) .. i 16.2 MP to do their jobs better by delivering photos with excellent quality and beautiful details ... shame qullo snap loud, sometimes too intrusive ..! ultimately for me a great camera for people who are in the world SLR for the first time .. it does its job in an excellent way with a quality / price ratio right ..! sent on October 15, 2013 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me