|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Verghera www.juzaphoto.com/p/Verghera  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon D4 Pros: Balancing intuitive ergonomics of the camera as usual nikon speed range iso Cons: A few too many hot pixels in long exposures, d800 better at this. Opinion: Coming from a D3 and having had other pro machines I have to say that a great leap forward has not been done but we say that it is more than ever improved the weapon still great beautiful and functional that I like nikon, it disturbs me a little the fact of the hot pixels with long exposures could do better seeing d800 and the interval timer in the car remains the same and impractical but for the rest of the files that returns are good, the autofocus is surgical targets and also with D running and where God convenient choice of illumination of the keys really useful a little more thirsty for battery also improved the vertical grip. sent on January 18, 2014 |
 | Nikon AF 35mm f/2 D Pros: Small light bright economic Cons: flare made to f2 Opinion: To think is unbeatable value for money although of course you can not expect that it is excellent at full aperture, but for what it costs and the convenience that you have to carry it around in my bag I can not miss a Nikonist used from f4 onwards is great but I had sold it to me've taken another. sent on September 20, 2013 |
 | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Package building sharpness focus to yield 1.4 Cons: I would say that nn has against the relevant Opinion: A premise I have always been against the sigma obviously after having had some and I tried on other friends.This of 35 I have to say that marked a sharp line with the past is a lens of sigma sigma revolutionary in the house, now at first glance a ' excellent impression the weight, solidity, the materials with which it is built, the attention to detail denote the intention of taking part in the competition with the L series canon and nikon top, and I think that this time we are succeeding, The satin finish barrel selector focus and the gem of the rubberized coating on the rear edge of the hood leave no possibility of critica.Ma the best is when you start to use the yield to f1.4 is excellent, a slight vignetting but nothing too from then stopping down is obvious that you get the best but I think it's useless to buy luminisa perspective and then use it to f8.Sempre to f1.4 aberrations are practically irrelevant, the distortion almost equally non-existent ... performs very well in the light, the af é precise and that was what worried me most, in short, at a price of 800 Euros and the web even less than I would say that a purchase is definitely recommended. sent on May 26, 2013 |
 | Canon 5D Mark III Pros: Autofocus WB yield at high iso hdr room overall speed of the machine ergonomics Cons: Lack of flash drive tropicalization Opinion: The choice of canon 5D MKII is to improve the successful MKIII this is truly a marvel ready to face any situation, even if put under pressure behaves really well nn has a volley from primacy but it is enough, the only thing missing tropicalization that really is on a machine so it should be almost a must. On a professional flash on camera nn nn is expected but it would be wrong to do some shooting with the system owner canon even with the limitations that you have anyway. At high ISO is nothing short of amazing shots taken at ISO 10000 jaw-dropping, but nn is the only peculiarity of the sensor, sharpness control purple fringing and aberrations in short, almost perfect maybe just a few too many hot pixels in long exposure but nothing dramatic . too complicated situations the WB automatically nn wrong is perfect as the autofocus which is really impeccable belonging to the thousands of settings (perhaps too many) is very precise and is able to focus evenwith very little illuminazione.Una nearly perfect car beautiful and addictive. sent on May 05, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Pros: Price Cons: Autofocus vignetting sharpness colors etc. ... Opinion: In short, who spends little .... it is normal that we can not expect anything that is a plastic lens that can not return results from leave you speechless, but as I gave it a pass because evaluation is however compared to the price and then can give the opportunity to those who have never prpvato a fixed lens light at least have an idea of ??what it is but with the understanding that then the real fixed lens is a different pasta. sent on May 05, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 135mm f/2.0 L USM Pros: Sharpen blurry autofocus three-dimensional color Cons: Nn if they find is amazing especially when you consider the price Opinion: a lens truly amazing how great contrasts blurred sharpness nn even know what aberrations are no vignetting surrender to f2 is excellent Nn you can remove it from the machine is even feel like taking unnecessarily every time to see what he can give, fantastic images colors beautiful nn I had problems with flare ghosting nientw sent on May 04, 2013 |
 | Nikon D600 Pros: built-in flash that can be used as a commander ... resistant to dust and water. Cons: WB, slow processor, storage on sd, too obvious noise even at low ISO. Opinion: I'm probably the error but each to their own impressions right or wrong then someone more competent judge, in my opinion, too many defects you really okay that FF is an entry level but it seems to me anyway nn costs so little to able to say, oh well you claim? rnSono been 6 years since the release of the D3 and D700, nice cars nothing to say, then the Nikonist satisfied nn wait to see how things have evolved reading right and left you can see direct comparisons of this machine with the Canon 5D mkIII from which comes out the winner, all the evidence sensor test say it's terrific, then buy it and you realize that it really threw the money and I'll regret an old d700 for nn to mention the incomparable D3 . This machine has a noticeable noise in the shadows even at low ISO, the transitions between lit areas and shaded areas are to get your hands in your hair, paradoxically increasing the ISO and having more improved grain seem to see this problem (AMAZING). I say from experience, and n hearsay, the sensor works veramente evil using optical light type 85 1.4g nn takes pictures of aa full aperture must be even close to a couple of stops for the aberrations of any kind are less obvious (OPTICAL THE SAME CAR ON OTHER DAMAGES NN the slightest PROBLEM), and I confirm that nn is the sensor works so giusto.Passando autofocus, belonging to the well-known fact that the points of focus are clustered in the center too, I would say that almost makes losing patience with little lighting (mind nn in the dark or in extreme conditions) nn focuses even if you could, I say yes, but there is light af and here's another thing truly inconceivable the machine sometimes snaps before turning off the light af, resulting in a beautiful light that point to the end is always original (REINCREDIBILE), however if you use the flash drive from the commander light af nn maybe this is I have yet to figure it out io.rnIl white balance is impressive nn nn guesses there's nothing to take pictures all go retouched in post production even preset values ??are reliability standards nnli.Insomma what to say in conclusion sent on April 17, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
