|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Reg.77 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Reg.77  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Panasonic G100 Pros: Compactness, photo quality (RAW), ergonomics, low weight, aesthetics Cons: Materials Mounting especially door for charging, battery life Opinion: A real positive surprise, purchased for its compact size. It has proved to be a real little gem for the photo department, I don't make videos. I come from various brands of the same price range has proven to be clearly superior, it will be my definitive companion for excursions and trips where I need lightness and at the same time quality. It does not have stabilization but I do not see it as a lack, I use Om system F4 pro lenses specifically the 12-45 and the 40-150 perfectly balanced and at the same time gives me high quality photos for an amateur of my level. In low light I always use Olympus 20 pro. It has many customizable buttons. The only two "defects" are the poor battery life and the autofocus that is not very fast and not exactly precise, but in manual it is a razor where it does not disappoint even in birdlife or macro photos of small insects and flowers. In conclusion, a small all-rounder, a real bargain for value for money. sent on December 28, 2024 |
 | Canon EF-M 15-45mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM Pros: Everything for the ridiculously low price paid, was included with the camera body Cons: None for its price Opinion: What can I say, I have the series M 11-22, the 22, the 28 and the 55 200. This objective based on its cost, that is included in the price with the machine body has the best value for money... And it has a stabilizer... It has its limits but it is built really well compact a battle objective, I use it for example at the sea on holiday with the family when I take it to the beach ... In daylight it is always clear. Much better than the smartphone to give an idea sent on March 25, 2023 |
 | Canon EF-M 11-22mm f/4-5.6 IS STM Pros: Sharp Cons: Not very bright, essential hood but to be paid separately Opinion: What can I say, there is little to say, sharp never misses a photo, excellent color rendering. It costs to be the M series but it's worth them all. The only two defects I found are the photos in dark environments but if you carry it around with the 22mm it solves the situation, for example when visiting cities of art. The second defect is indispensable to have its hood that Canon should give it, in this case, together when buying it. sent on March 25, 2023 |
 | Canon EF-M 55-200mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM Pros: Focal length, compact Cons: Sharpness not always good Opinion: Taken with so many expectations, I came from an olympus 40-150 that was always accurate, but in some respects it disappointed me a bit. Knowing to buy the M series I would not have had such performing lenses for wildlife photos but if I take a picture of a bird a little distant or moving with scarcity of light ... Better to leave it alone... which did not happen with Zuiko. Of course its priamrio use is not for this, you can already guess it before buying it, but to resume still subjects even at a distance as long as there is light and clear days. Otherwise its limits come out. It is good to photograph the details of a bell tower, to try to understand its use. It is also good for taking pictures of small animals or insects at close range but not to disturb them here it surprised me. Not to be used as soon as the sun goes down and I highly recommend taking its hood that Canon charges separately. sent on March 25, 2023 |
 | Canon EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM Pros: An all-rounder and clarity in the presence of light Cons: Supermacro function with scarcity aperture limits Opinion: I bought it for macro photos turned out to be an all-rounder that led me to postpone at the time of purchase of the 32mm. For macro photos maybe it is my biggest disappointment, in the supermacro function with stationary objects they are perfect, with insects or flowers moving with the wind it is unusable. But by disabling the supermacro function the focus for macro photos becomes good even with insects and flowers in slight movement. Where I was surprised is the photos in broad daylight or at least with light. They are very sharp, for the views come out beautiful colors and for the close-ups they are excellent. The LEDs use them little, but they can be convenient. Excellent stabilization. sent on March 25, 2023 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
