|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Dottor Frank www.juzaphoto.com/p/DottorFrank  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Panasonic Lumix G 20mm f/1.7 II ASPH Pros: Size, lightness, versatility. Cons: Speed ad. Addiction to always having it with you Opinion: It is about the same size as a cap or adapter ring. Very sharp, it doesn't have a beautiful blur but that's what you expect from a 1.7. Low price. In the camera bodies the small size makes them compact. They fit in the pocket of the jacket or even the trousers if it has large pockets. Must have. The 20mm teaches you how to photograph. A step back x the reportage of the 17th. One ahead for the first portrait of the 25th. sent on January 26, 2025 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100mm f/4.0 IS Pro Pros: All Cons: Nobody Opinion: It's maybe the reason why I'm still using mft. I don't find any fault with this lens. Perfect for 95 percent of people. It's all do, a does everything well. Tropicalized, stabilized. 24 200 equivalent. At 100mm you also have a nice blur x portraits. Great x tourists, families, hikers, wildlife, landscape, reportage. With a flash also x events and weddings. Medium-distance sports photography with a lot of versatility, from wide-angle to telephoto. I would buy it again. I think that together with a small fixed light it makes a whole kit. Not suitable for birdlife, not very pushed. sent on January 26, 2025 |
 | Sigma 56mm f/1.4 DC DN C Pros: All Cons: Nobody Opinion: Fantastic portrait lens for mft. It doesn't make you regret the FF. Crisp already at full opening. At F2.8 it is a blade. Nice soft blurred it. Too bad sigma has stopped producing x mft lenses. I own it together with the 16. Now I will also take the 30. F1.4 does not differ so much from the pro 1.2 lenses. In terms of light, it is blurred. Of course, those are even better and built with better materials. Slightly tropicalized. But for the cost of these 3 sigma lenses you can't get any better. Halfway between the prime 1.7 lenses and the pro 1.2. Promoted sent on January 26, 2025 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 III Pros: Top of the range, reliability. Tropical. Batteries that last a lot. Excellent ergonomics. Good grip grip. Weight. Materials, build quality. Stabilization. Cons: Menu button on the opposite side. I would have preferred the ignition and the menu button all on the right so as to do everything with one hand. But it is my opinion, for many it will not be a problem. Opinion: Fantastic machine. It's a pro. You can work on it, as an amateur photo it is you can say definitive, you can do anything with it. It was x me a switch from the m10 II. You can hear so much difference, ad-c tracking and stachink livend etc etc. So much stuff. Still in 2025 I would recommend it to everyone. Fantastic high res from a tripod. Even freehand. But Panasonic gives fewer artifacts on moving things. From photo amateur, or traveler if you put them on a 12 100 You forget it. If you put on a 17 1.8 or a 20 1.7, despite the grip it still fits in the pocket of the jacket. It's not like the 5 or 10 series in terms of compactness, but for being a flagship you can't ask for more. Promoted sent on January 26, 2025 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
