|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Worldlibre www.juzaphoto.com/p/Worldlibre |
Samsung NX1 Pros: Backlit sensor, image quality, general characteristics ahead of competitors, tropicalized, black and white at Pentax and Fuji levels. Cons: Samsung has decided to castrate the photo sector in favor of smartphones. Many users ignore its qualities and this reassures them. Objective 16 50 by quality weight. Despite the excellent ergonomics in my opinion the rubber is too soft. Opinion: A camera that confirms how the photographic market is substantially still conditioned by a series of dynamics and factors that have closed, reduced or disappeared many brands in these 20 years. At the base of everything, according to my humble opinion and experience, lies in the conformism that pervades all markets and that instead of generating real competition and development determines a block. The machine in production 2014 and now out of production for some time retains characteristics that still many of the current on the market and passed off and sold for top products do not have. The only things Samsung could do would have been stabilization and an optical viewfinder. On the other hand, the electronics supplied, even that, is better than many on the market today. I conclude by saying..... Too bad. Who you decide for. sent on June 05, 2023 |
Fujifilm XC 50-230mm f/4.5-6.7 OIS II Pros: Weight, price, image quality. Cons: Finish. Opinion: Purchased a few days ago from the few shots taken, it generated a positive impression on me. Considering weight, features, quality and price I think it is a valid companion to circulate together with the 15-45. The demonstration that in reality you do not need so much money to get a noteworthy image quality. Surely there is better but you must be willing to spend 2 to 3 times more. For me honestly not worth it. sent on May 10, 2023 |
Fujifilm XC 15-45mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS PZ Pros: Sharp, light, compact, economical, stabilized. Cons: Zoom Opinion: Despite being a lens of the economic series XC gives images always engraved, detailed and sharp. It surprises in relation to the price. Obviously, tropicalization and materials are renounced. However, it remains ideal for streets, landscapes and even some macro. You can take away unsuspected satisfactions. An all-rounder to respect and try ...... Just look at the published photos. Vote 10. sent on March 16, 2023 |
Fujifilm XF 16-80mm f/4 R OIS WR Pros: Detail, precision, speed Cons: If weight is a limit... There is always a good smartphone Opinion: Surprising in all phases of recovery. Prompt, detailed and precise. Difficult to put in crisis proved to be a good companion on the X-M 1. Obviously you have to settle for 16 mpx, the absence of the viewfinder, the absence of the level plus other things. But looking in the pockets of memory for something you always take home. And with satisfaction. sent on February 07, 2023 |
Sony W210 Pros: Almost too small, almost too bright, almost too fast Cons: Delicate battery door. Unfortunately it all refers to the Sony DSC WX7 which is always from the same year. Opinion: A pocket fun, stereo hifi audio, great videos, 16 mp resolution, infinite battery. Burst from 10 photos, panoramic photos and 3d. Bright display. Complete programs but without the possibility of shooting in manual. 2.6.One of the many cameras that is missing from the lists. The advent of smartphones has castrated an industry that was very dynamic and interesting. sent on May 08, 2022 |
Fujifilm X-M1 Pros: lightweight, image quality, black and white cuttlefish and all fuji film simulations are incomparable. Cons: the usual however negligible at this price level. Opinion: Purchased second-hand it turned out to be a tool as a camera should be. Handy, practical simple and effective menu. Possibly even more direct and immediate would be perfect. Let's see if pentax, Fuji or Olympus get there first. I await the Pentax only black and white, manual and without video. Other than Arsenal 2.......... sent on April 24, 2022 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me