|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Luca Montori 94 www.juzaphoto.com/p/LucaMontori94 ![]() |
![]() | Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR Pros: Construction, sharpness really top to all apertures. A truly professional zoom. Excellent quality. Cons: Stabilization and hood. Opinion: I must say that this fuji 16-55 is a really high quality lens. Truly impeccable construction. Top sharpness at all apertures also a very nice aesthetic look. Some say the weight for me mounted on an xh1 I have no problem on the weight. Of course, in smaller camera bodies, perhaps the weight of the lens can somehow create some discomfort. Surely the stabilization is missing and this involves buying a car with the stabilizer perhaps the negative thing is that. The hood is not always effective at mounting it. Lens absolutely recommended. sent on September 18, 2021 |
![]() | Fujifilm X-H1 Pros: Ergonomics, weight, ISO seal, stabilization and price. Cons: Battery, autofocus not always perfect and noise even at low ISO in shadow recovery. Tends to under expose. Opinion: I must say that it is a great machine, for the price of the used it is really a bargain. Surely ergonomics is its strong point it grips very well and is not heavy. I must say that in the high lights and in a general sense the high ISO up to 6400 the machine is really good there is always a bit of noise but never annoying. Unfortunately, however, this cannot be said in the shadows that as soon as you try to recover in post production the noise is evident. Excellent stabilizer. The battery lasts very little but for what I do it is not a big problem. Not perfect focus area, sometimes the focus points move for no reason. In case put the focus points back where you want manually. The machine tends to underexpose. Overall according to my needs a great machine throughout. The price for the used is really interesting. Satisfied. With the 16-55 fuji is the perfect match. sent on September 18, 2021 |
![]() | Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/4-5.6 IS STM Pros: Lightness, stabilizer and price (which can paradoxically be a cons based on the use you want to make) little distortion and little vignetting. Cons: Many chromatic aberrations, sharpness, construction. Opinion: I state that it costs little so you can not expect it to work miracles. So for those who want to start it is a lens that is more than fine, a very low weight in more stabilized, also noticing little vignetting and distortion. Surely the most painful notes are the chromatic aberrations, the sharpness that does not enhance even if closing at f8 the aperture the sharpness improves. The construction is made of plastic so certainly not of great quality. I gave 7 for the price range. sent on September 10, 2021 |
![]() | Canon 2000D Pros: Light weight, ergonomics, stabilizer, well done menu. Cons: Burst and autofocus. Opinion: Let's start from the fact that it is an entry level, so you can not expect it to do what a professional machine can do. Surely it is a machine that to learn the first steps for photography is fine. Let's say that I found myself well with ergonomics and all in all the weight that with the kit is light. The autofocus is not a strong point of this machine but however the shot takes it home. The gust is too little. I gave 8 in total for what the machine offers at a decidedly low price, being an entry level. If you want to take a step forward at a professional level this machine is definitely to be left or sold. sent on September 10, 2021 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me