|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Donagh www.juzaphoto.com/p/Donagh ![]() |
![]() | Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM Pros: Blurred (the best of canon in my opinion), Construction Tropicalized, Yield on tonal transitions, impressive even in ex-f4 f8 etc ... (it is also his "defect"), nice vignette, vintage made for about aberrations Cons: It takes a while to acquire the hand "stops" that does not face the slip plane of focus that is smaller than that of a "normal" 50mm even at small apertures due to the abrupt transition between the area in focus and out of focus, always detaches also when you close the diaphragm, some aberration but is a minor flaw ... Opinion: Used with satisfaction on 5dm3 for almost two years, a great yield for the environmental portrait, blurred scream, good-excellent sharpness, accuracy af in the servant (better take so with this in mind), made beautiful skin on the girls (in this case a super clear lens does not help), if the environmental portrait is your field, I can only recommend it, I've used the always paired with the 135mm f2. Sold by just requiring a 50mm closed me increases the depth of field for good and light have always below (choosing home canon: 50 1.8 STM), maintaining kit very few lenti.rnrnLo advice! Rnrn (for the same reason in the past I've sold 2 85mm 1.2 mk1 and mk2, were specialized and heavy to carry, to them I preferred the 135mm f2) sent on August 02, 2015 |
![]() | Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Pros: Small and lightweight, Yield to f2.8, Defocused, Cost, Precision af Cons: to want to list something: Engine STM (not as fast as the 135f2 to speak) but is fine for the lens and its use! Opinion: Purchased at Christmas with the canon Rebate from Galaxia, it cost me almost 110 Euros, I just say ... fabulous !!!! rnnon I expected a yield so !! colors, blur, sharpness wide open (on) rnquel bit of vignetting that I love (to 2.8 then disappears), good canon, a great lens from negligible cost and value for money amazing !!!!! rnrnHo also 24 1.4 mk2, 50 1.2 and 135f2 and this looks good at all of them !!!! rnl I used recently in a set and I was really impressed !!! Really good when it comes to having more people on fire in the scene (not super selective as 50 1.2) rnrnsuper recommended !!!!!!!!!!!! rnrn sent on January 19, 2015 |
![]() | Canon 5D Mark III Pros: ff - Materials - 100% Viewfinder (finally!) - Autofocus with so many good points - Silent shooting - Battery life - auto iso - white balance - at least 3 stops on dry 5d old in picture quality and ISO Cons: transmissive LCD viewfinder with the points af blacks (LEDs preferred) - shutter button is very sensitive we become accustomed to - 1 SD slot 1 and slot 2 instead of slot cf cf - dynamic range (I was expecting something like my fuji X) - iso usable not very high (the 1DX does it better) - Metering (compared to the 1DX) improved - jpg car of average quality. Opinion: I made the transition from 5d 5d mk1 this Mark3 at Christmas, what has improved in all! 3 stop or more in the same size print I find them all right! RnNel my use (portraits and photography in low light) I find only one flaw: the LCD display in the viewfinder, the squares are af blacks (can be illuminated with a light menu but by doing this you will become visible since then in 'goal you see the red light) I would have preferred the good old led.rnrnApparte I find this a very good car with exceptional autonomy, and colors have lent a very bellirnMi 1DX and so I was able to evaluate the differences between the two machine (which I have listed in the defects) is another category .. but the 1DX ... rnSono satisfied with this machine and give him a nice 9 (if it had everything I've written in the defects would be 10) rnrnconsigliata! (If weight and price for you not take a count 1DX which is even better) sent on July 09, 2014 |
![]() | Fujifilm XF 14mm f/2.8 R Pros: Sharpness and overall optical performance, construction, size Cons: Aperture ring slightly soft (minor issue to want to nitpick), lens hood hideous plastic, it works just fine without ... Opinion: A great (21mm), it is a pleasure to do street with this lens in hyperfocal setting or rather "focus zone", the focus ring is released with a movement and becomes fluid and shows the various references for distances .... you can easily shoot without being noticed and immediately, the yield to 2.8 is fabulous and closing grows more and more, building a reference, the size contenute.rné super wide x for the system, I also had the 18mm usavornsuper bought together but not recommended! sent on March 25, 2014 |
![]() | Canon EF 24mm f/1.4 L II USM Pros: Sharp even wide open (even at the edges), blurred beautiful, beautiful vignette that gives a unique look to your photos, fast and accurate AF, colors (wonderful) (my copy has serial Zxxxxx) Cons: A bit heavy but well balanced, big lens hood (never used so far seems good to resist flares), it costs a little Opinion: Bought after 2.8 years of 24, I was amazed by his performance, much better than I thought ... species at f1.4 sharp scary! rn "24 must have" ok it's a bit ingrombrante compared to younger brother .... rnabbinato 2.8 50 1.2 135f2 and creates the "hat-trick of dreams" rnrnATTENZIONE: the lenses of this type create dipendenzarnrn sent on January 12, 2014 |
![]() | Fujifilm XF 35mm f/1.4 R Pros: Sharpness of fear even at f1.4, three-dimensionality and Out of the plans, color rendering, light and solid construction Cons: few really important ... I could point out the autofocus, it is the "first type" and not "like ultrasonic" such as zoom 18-55 Opinion: A nice "52mm" perfect start "seriously" with the X, focus very precise and beautiful aperture ring directly on the body, lens hood interesting and oddly shaped (vaguely reminiscent of certain leica 28mm), rubber stopper I always use the lens hood and I do not lose (thank goodness), color rendering really nice, very different from the zoom, I find it better than the canon 50mm 1.4 sent on August 29, 2013 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me