|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Emanuelelince www.juzaphoto.com/p/Emanuelelince  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EOS R Pros: If you know what you buy, everything. Cons: If you know what you're buying, nothing but some crap. Opinion: I've been Fujista for a long time. Before I had Nikon for photos and Panasonic for video. I have always worked well with Fuji, less with Nikon, much less but as they say it is a matter of feeling. Canon Eos R is a machine that needs to be digested and is not as immediate as a Fuji with all its extraordinary dials. I can understand why this machine was not taken by many sympathetic canonists. Canon, in my opinion, has swerved too abruptly to enter the mirrorless world, but that's my opinion. I used the 5d mk ii tried the iii, the 6d, the 6d mk ii, the 7d, and I always considered Canon the best house in photography but I am also one of the many advocates of the technological revolution if as intelligent as the one that brought us from the mirrorless world to my methodology of working the groom in full (everything is subjective , useless to have debates about what is better). This Canon is a blank canvas and if you use native optics, the ones that make you give both kidneys for a zoom, you have the possibility, if you are a fujista and very attached as I am to the physical gullies to sew on the machine as you want. I admit that this was my fear at first because I am a lazy and I hate learning new machines. In the hand it is light and perfect even for those who have peaceful hands like mine. The fierce criticism of the touchbar and taken off on the new ones I do not understand it because I consider it also quite functionale if the idea of giving it to the joystick I approve Of Here the lack of this is the only flaw I found and the screen as a touch methodology to move the focus point can be comfortable sometimes and sometimes uncomfortable , so once again a matter of habit. Otherwise it is a professional machine even if some consider it to be intermediate range without ever having tried it. The dynamic range could not be better, I do not understand those who say the opposite based only on legends maybe even with a background of truth referred to the machines of 15 years ago. The canon eos R is a machine that returns a very good feeling and files that I think can be considered perfect for workability, weight, malleability etc... The image quality is at really high levels and perhaps like all machines since they removed I'm blessed AA filter to count the pores of the model's skin and then remove them in the post to make porcelain dolls, it is all too defined. The 30 million pixels are right if printed in large format more in my opinion serve only to sell and amaze but in practice... As long as you're not "anonymous croppist." And then if you want 60 or more million pixels why don't you go on medium format and you have to hold tight stip by poor pixels?! Canon made a great car. Only one Slot, ok they could have put two as now after 2 years did Nikon with the z5 when for 1 year and a half said that now were the xqd the future (here we talk about consistency in addition to bad planning but it is a speech too long). Ultimately I was afraid of the change, but after two weeks and some shots made for work I am extremely glad to have made the jump despite the kidney sold. The feeling is already good and I think it will become great. sent on August 03, 2020 |
 | Fujifilm X-Pro2 Pros: it is the most beautiful camera made recently (aesthetically) and a great machine throughout. Cons: cool but useless optical viewfinder. Opinion: Crazy. I took this machine to flank the xt2 6 months ago for the 2020 season in place of the x100f. Machine that I wouldn't know what to add except fantastic. really recommended to those who want to be a photographer a little less to those who also want to make videos because then the xt2 is better. Crazy files like that I've already written for the xt2 and the xe3. Here maybe I expected a little more from the buffer. sent on July 30, 2020 |
 | Fujifilm X-T2 Pros: I've never felt better with a car. Cons: Some might say iso over 6400 but what the hell should be done to higher iso? Opinion: I write this review in a sad time because my xt2 after 3 and a half years of honored career is beating the last blows. Despite this I think she was a crazy travel companion and I can say that I started my career as a professional photographer with her (as my only job, with my studio not second so this stuff here). after a short interlude with Nikon d7500 and d800 with which I found it really bad to land in Fuji with this was a dream. We've had some disagreements over time mainly because I saw the other houses go on and Fuji, let's face it stay a little bit at the pole. But what a nice pole. In short, Fuji is crazy in every way. I used it for professional videos, wedding photo shoots, fashion and I found myself enchanted. With this apsc I also did campaigns where the file was printed 2 meters by 3 and I think it would have been great for larger prints. Fuji at the file level I think is the best although contrary to those who say otherwise my problem I had with a maybe excessive sharpness that always leads to having to touch up the skin. jpg if taken not for work are perfect. Now after almost 4 years I have moved to Canon eos r and I have to eye a file that I think is very different but I still do not understand if better or worse. At most I'll be back in fuji taking the xt3.... Wonder... The xt2 was the perfect machine for me. sent on July 30, 2020 |
 | Fujifilm X-E3 Pros: lightness, files like xt2 and similar processor, all in one hand Cons: weak buffer for some quick-taken photos or short bursts Opinion: The xe3 was and is the machine with which the feeling was taken immediately, just tried at a city marathon where I went only to try the fuji material 4 years ago. that trial started with this and two months later I had fuji kit. I use it professionally for both fashion and wedding services and leisure. It's a very good machine. I have big, chubby hands and for convenience I preferred to add a third-party grip to her. The apsc sensor as many will have found does not make you regret a ff for yield. Of course now comparing it to the newest has lagged a little behind but I feel I really recommend it to those who start professionally. low cost, high file quality when used with fixed and bright optics. The iso discourse leaves some time it finds because it depends on how you are used to shooting and for what purpose. I in the studio from this xe3 I printed a 70x 90 taken at 3200 iso and the noise that appeared on video during printing disappeared giving me a very beautiful image of a wedding. If you do anything else, as fashion services well, so much there over 400 very few times go and you will have a nice to do in the post because this machine is so detailed that you will be forced to soften (soften not make wax dolls) the skin of the model. In any case, to return to the previous speech this is a great machine for those who start in any sector or for those in need of a second body. price quality imbattibile.la found with a 35 f1.4 and 3 or 4 spare batteries and a 18-55 now at about 1000 euros (I say with the 18-55 because it's the cheapest optics if you also make videos like me). Video quality from 9. sent on July 30, 2020 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
