|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Bruno64 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Bruno64  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | OM System OM-5 Pros: Portability, robustness, size, image quality, intuitive menu, high resolution shooting. Cons: noise from 6400 onwards Opinion: I use the OM 5 as a landscape camera during my mountain hikes and I am largely satisfied with it; The images are very good and allow a large post-production capable of recovering many details and always have an excellent dynamic range. The battery life is excellent and allows two or three days of use with at least 150 images, the menu is very intuitive and customizable. Its weight and size allow it to be easily transported while hiking. Together with the 12 40 and the 7 14 they offer wide perspectives for those who want to return home with a few shots of their excursions. Above 6400 the digital noise is intrusive but the characteristics of the sensor are designed for shots at lower ISO. sent on December 08, 2024 |
 | Nikon D5 Pros: operating speed, reliability, high ISO image quality seal Cons: Price Opinion: The best car to date held for image quality at the highest ISO that allows you to shoot indoor sensitivity and speed never before possible. Precision AF with lenses typical of the sports equipment, namely 70 200, 300, 200 400 is absolute, with a percentage of AF out of focus laughable, provided you use the corretti.rnMenu settings and typically Nikon buttons, which allow you to adapt easily, if you come from other flagships. The picture quality even at low ISO is not absolutely mediocre but also enjoys a very precise white balance. Finally JPEG ready assoluamente use are of excellent quality even in difficult lighting situations, and can be excluded from the process the RAW with benefit in terms of time and processing of images: scope of purely sporting work, with absolute reliability n every condition utilizzo.rnConsigliabile the use of XQD cards that are less prone to problems relating to the card slots with connetof CF bulls they tend to bend, using high intensivo.rnPrezzo as, unfortunately, the custom of the flagships attuali.rn sent on November 21, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S 200-400mm f/4 G ED VR II Pros: sharpness, autofocus speed, relatively light, building quality. Cons: None, except the cost. Opinion: Taken Used like new (?!), Immediately set to work in sport; absolutely excellent quality, with excellent sharpness and AF speed; used with D4S does not regret the 300 2.8 VR1 sold to make room for this zoom lens. Especially with the AF limiter does not miss a beat. Not particularly cumbersome, if compared to the features, it saves time in post, when the fixed lens I often had to crop the image. Indistinguishable loss of quality in 400.rnConsigliato especially on dell'Usato market, where often found in conditions as a showcase. sent on May 09, 2016 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Pros: Image quality; stabilizer surprising; workability of RAW Cons: Menu poorly practical; quality from 3200 onwards that deteriorates rapidly; Opinion: Good camera for everyday use and professional up to 3200 ISO. Besides the picture it is rather mixed and used only for the web.rnInteressantissima the ability to create high-resolution photos and HDR quite easily. Very good image quality and extremely workable PP. rnIl menu is rather unintuitive and often must search laboriously trivial adjustments as the AutoISO or correction dell'esposzione. Flash supplied is comfortable but underpowered, but good for photos in small interiors. Handy, it is ideal for hiking yet to be performed with little weight on his shoulders. sent on January 03, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
