|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Federicoz www.juzaphoto.com/p/Federicoz  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EOS RP Pros: Lightness, size, price Cons: Electronic viewfinder, keys Opinion: 10-year-old FF Canon (5D>5D2>5D3>6D), I took this RP to update the machine body and to have something lighter to carry around. I also took the Canon EG-E1 to increase the size of the socket when using heavier lenses. I feel good, as i use seems to me improved compared to the FF reflex, ok you have to make a moment the habit since with the FF I could almost shoot without looking in the room. A strange thing at the moment is the electronic viewfinder, which also returns the photo you just took (great since you can choose multiple display modes even with the histogram) but has almost difficult feedback in focusing the image displayed in the crosshairs, at least from my point of view. I will use it mainly for landscapes so I will use the winding display, but for other photographic uses I recommend you try it well before purchase. sent on August 12, 2019 |
 | Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM Pros: Color rendition, compact, lightweight Cons: Focus Ring Opinion: Taken to pull out of a drawer an Eos M that I could not sell, excellent lens, if foced at the right distance the blur to TA is pleasing. Only negative the focus ring really small. I think I'll only use EOS m + 22 in the next few trips to stay light. I would be curious to know the yield of this lens with one of the last m present on the market sent on December 14, 2018 |
 | Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Pros: Size, weight, price, quality Cons: none Opinion: After a few years of use I have to confirm the goodness of this perspective. Small, lightweight, and at least in my case supernitida. The field returned view of FF is special and or likes and dislikes. I have not encountered problems on the opposite color, more realistic and almost never tending to verde.rnCredo is one of the first targets to use the new engine stm. sent on January 20, 2017 |
 | Canon EOS M Pros: Size, weight, versilità, file quality Cons: battery life, no input for external remote control Opinion: Jack used with 2mesi life, to use as a second body, excellent yield with L series lenses, of course it is not as fast as a DSLR but if used in great churning out excellent files. rnUna flaw in my opinion is the external attack without the remote control, thus preventing the use of an interval timer (for example, star-trail) rn sent on January 20, 2017 |
 | Canon 5D Mark II Pros: Excellent resolution, ergonomics, return the file Cons: autofocus, far too little Opinion: I use it now for 1 year and a half before he had the 5D mk1, the file created is far superior to its predecessor, the AF has remained almost the same, I am forced to always use the central point of focus, with targets used bright, with an excellent three-dimensionality to the scene. I use it as main machine, do not use hardly ever canvases, and for most of the photographs I mount 17-40 f4 L, 50 1.4 and 85 1.8, this triad, the contrast is excellent even at room temperature sent on February 09, 2012 |
 | Canon EF 20mm f/2.8 USM Pros: Optical quality Cons: old design and quality at the edges Opinion: I had this perspective, being able to create a very beautiful, but the big drawback is the resolution at the corners, can not satisfy the sensors are too large to px. With what it costs hard to find perspective as bright and wide, for use indoors! On aps-c can be used as a fixed lens, even for street photography. The lens construction is good, with smooth focus and excellent assembly sent on October 03, 2011 |
 | Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: Weight, sharpness, vignetting Cons: diameter filters Opinion: I had both the first version than the second, differences selector on FF I personally like the vignetting that at RT, chromatic aberration can be a problem in certain scenes, but in a landscape use, then closing the aperture stop of several , is gradually to sminurire this defect AC, is a lens that should not be missing in the scope of a landscape photographer! sent on October 03, 2011 |
 | Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Pros: Price, quality of the blur, sharpen Cons: Slow and noisy AF, build quality is not excellent Opinion: On APS-C is a bit 'long when used as primary optics when used with a 10-20/22 can be part of a camera kit. THE build quality is not up to canon, even the series USM, plasticky and games, but returns good images, copy in my possession at the minimum focus is sharper than a canon 24-70 I had, but resists slightly flare, and many times moving shots loses focus. On a FF (21mpx) the use as optical all-around, with excellent results sent on October 03, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
