|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Alex170290 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Alex170290  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Panasonic Lumix 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 II OIS Pros: a great lens.. light, great hike, all-do for travel, AF RAPIDO,lampshed Cons: the front upholstery is too easily paraded if we really want to find the hair in the egg. vignette a bit like all 14mm zoom lenses... the important thing is that of the defect you make a virtue of it perfection exists only in paradise XD Opinion: it is a great lens, crisp, very balanced colors, I always use it and I get dream photos like never before. The surrender is great and has a pat on the ass! IF YOU HAVE TO make yourself a self-portrait with af always takes us ! if you have to make a video it's top there too. In short, it is perhaps the lens that I use the most but above all for yield and for the af che is excellent. if you do not use af there is always analog photography waiting for you :) sent on May 12, 2021 |
 | Zeiss Jena Tessar 50mm f/2.8 Pros: construction, sharpness, blurry, bokeh, colors Cons: maybe the passage of the diaphragm is a little strange.. Opinion: it's an optics that returns very natural colors, with the best bokeh ever seen. 12 slats of the diaphragm guys, the bokeh is a booling ball. Sharpness is great. the construction made in Germany is beautiful, all in metallic silver. The only drawback in my focus is very hard, so you have to crack it a little bit. It's for still photos! it's beautiful aesthetically, sexyy sent on April 15, 2021 |
 | Panasonic Lumix G 25mm f/1.7 ASPH Pros: weight, sharpness Cons: the af is a bit of a dancer in difficult conditions, but then tranqui that hooks it up to you! XD have patience Opinion: it's a very sharp lens even at 1.7.. to have a higher resolution there is only sigma art. Closed to f 2 does not explain the resolution and the af is very good. The focus ring is also fluid and prof, bayonet is made of metal and therefore good, the best light is obviously that example of fuji 23f2 which is slim and harms the dignity than that of nikons. The blurry is soft and pleasant. The pasty colors obviously beautiful combined with an olympus. go like a train!! sent on April 03, 2021 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 Pros: all,body, keys, file quality, battery, stabilization x videoo! ... Cons: nothing, at most the menu but just if you are so lazy that you do not want to dismantle for a moment ... and some little XD keys Opinion: Between fuji Nikon and Olympus this Oly is the machine that churns out the best files with real colors. They are ready-to-use files and the optical fleet is also better than fuji with stabilized and even tropicalized optics at more affordable costs. In addition, the optics are smaller and this is the biggest advantage when traveling or when taking photos on the easel too. The machine is water resistant, reliable, the battery lasts twice as long as the fuji xe2. For videos it's top! sent on April 03, 2021 |
 | Yashica ML 50mm f/1.7 Pros: sharpening even at 1.7, metal construction Cons: didn't have any Opinion: it's a fantastic lens and I use it on fuji xe2. I think it's sharper than a native fuji lens and has a fantastic vintage rendering. It has the same optical scheme as the zeiss planar so obviously the yield is of a high level. it's also sharp at f 1.7 so for portraits it's the best you can have. The construction is therefore made of high-quality metal with diaphragm ring of course that shoots like a jewel. a fear lens for mirrorless and also on film reflex since I have a yashica fx3super. with this do the go to the next level! over the toppp sent on March 27, 2021 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: crazy sharpness, lightness and construction Cons: a little flare... the 24 85 ff is better from this point of view, the colors are very "digital" and sharp but it seems obvious to me XD Opinion: it is a lens that for panoramas from the maximum because it opens to 16mm and therefore would be a 24 ff. It has a sharpness that few others have and I like it because it is quite light. Even for portraits it returns natural and not too artificial colors, the only thing perhaps the contrast is power! for apsc you don't find optics like that, then the rest does the situation and your eye :) Surrender as I said does not have that pasty effect or with personality , it is a neutral and sharp yield. sent on March 27, 2021 |
 | Nikon AF-P DX 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3G VR Pros: sharpness, colours, construction, etc., whether or not for Cons: from the best up to 200 mm Opinion: it is also a portrait lens that has incredible sharpness and up to 200 mm is a blade. It has fantastic colors like nikon optics in general. it is not too bright so sometimes you have to raise the iso but I think this is not a problem nowadays. the mount also for fullframe and makes it very good! at 70 mm it is really sharp even to make some portraits and you have an interesting focal point .. sent on March 27, 2021 |
 | Fujifilm XF 23mm f/2 R WR Pros: sharpness all over the frame, well built, good focus ring Cons: aesthetics, stupid lampshed, doesn't have much "magic" Opinion: it's a nice lens that would be a 35mm ff. you do a little bit of everything and it's sharp. It doesn't have much magic in yield as maybe you can have with a nikon lens or sigma art but it's good for street and vacation shots. it's an f2 and it's also sharp at f2 but you don't expect to blur the background unless you photograph an object at close range. It's a lens that does its duty without giving you too much emotion... the lampshed is to be thrown from the bucket directly sent on March 27, 2021 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED VR Pros: good sharpness, size, smooth ring, construction in general, pasty yield Cons: filters of 72, lampshed a little too light.. Opinion: it is a lens that I use on nikon d700 and rhymes the range of "classic" focals from panoramas to portraits. it's basically an f.4 so quite bright. It has the rendering of the g series and very beautiful colors. The construction is professional with the metal barrel and a zoom ring with bows. at f 5.6 is great. Also better than the 24 120 especially at 85 mm in which it makes excellent if you have to make a portrait on the fly. It also seems to me a hair better than the 16-85 for apsc which still has a superb overall sharpness and hardly equals in zooms. It mounts filters from 72 but I just found an Amazon discount for an nd16 filter at 22 euros so I fixed :) recommended and small in size. sent on March 27, 2021 |
 | Nikon AF 50mm f/1.8 D Pros: crisp, light, pastel colors, bokeh Cons: Plastic Opinion: it's a beautiful lens, light and crisp. it's the 50th that you can take around and take a few portraits on the classic weekend. af is faster than the g series so it's better. Tests say it's sharper than 50 1.4 d especially in the middle. compared to the g series it has the most pastel and dreamy colors, vintage, with a personality. The g series has the sharp and sharp colors and contours that make you dream less and make the shot colder and blander. this 1.8 d instead makes you dream.... the focus ring is a bit small but I often use af. Also I can use this unlike the g series also on the 90s analog SLRs when I want to make some film :=) in particular I have a nikon4001s from 1989 and if I want to shoot a portrait of a film pussy I will mount this lens and I also have the af! go as a beast!! Excellent sharpness from f2 onwards. sent on March 27, 2021 |
 | Vivitar 28mm f/2.8 (Minolta MD) Pros: fluid rings, light, sharpness, colors Cons: mah none Opinion: it's a beautiful lens to take with you. if you have an apsc you have the "perfect" focal point, the standard that is like a 42 mm as it was mounted in old analog. if instead you have a ff you have a 28 mm that you make us beautiful views without bending the stand with XD weight in 2. a f 2.8 is soft and so I only use it in some interior portrait. at f 3.5 it is already sharp enough and at f 4 it is sharp all over the frame. even for portraits around it's fine, of course you don't do the blurry but if you want to show where you were a minimum background we will have to put it:) so here it is useful on holiday when you do not want to give the image of the tourist with the classic "rifle" kit and useful for some internal portrait because it has an interesting focal point ... sent on March 26, 2021 |
 | Nikon D90 Pros: read, file quality, commands all at your fingertips, 12mpx Cons: it doesn't have a big screen but it's okay the photos you see them then on the pc! not tropicalized for those who shoot under the snow Opinion: it is an honest machine, it does its job and with good optics it also makes good. it's better than the 5000 series of which I had the d5600 that seemed to me with colors too contrasted and above all not have the focus engine that this one has instead. The controls on board the d90 are better arranged and you should not start to sponge in the menu. The color rendering is softer but I mean, in post production you do everything for these little differences. good holiday machine and very good also for macrophotography for crop factor. the 12 mpx are fine with all the optics, if you mount the vintages you go great! Only thing has no exposure meter with vintage optics. The iso estate up to 1000 is fine, so enough for all uses unless you mount the dark 18 55 from XD kit. Even in analog above 800 iso you never went there also because it doesn't make sense! sent on March 26, 2021 |
 | Nikon D700 Pros: robustness, file quality, reliability, dream photo rendering Cons: a little heavy, 95% coverage viewfinder Opinion: it's a great machine with a really crazy sensor. if you shoot in raw and like to do then postproduction you have a recovery of shadows and scary lights. The keys are comfortable and intuitive. When you hold it in your hand you feel a great machine. You can mount nikon vintage lenses that historically are valuable optics. The sensor is balanced for the lenses on the market so at the quality level you can not get better unless you take a d800 with a 1500 euro lens:) . the colors are pasty and not too contrasted that make the photo more unique and picturesque, not from "fashion cover" (unless you have to do the XD one). Jpegs are also not bad and I also uploaded all the profiles of the old films such as agfa, fuji velvia, kodak gold to reproduce that vintage look when I do not want to do post production for all the photos (holiday cases). it's a great car and it lasts you a lot... the iso seal is up to 1600 good.. but I mean if you have to push it to those iso values it means you're using kaiser lenses or shooting in the dark XD sent on March 26, 2021 |
 | Fujifilm X-E2 Pros: lightness, file quality, compatibility with vintage optics, black and white Cons: really poor battery life, keys Opinion: It is a cute machine equipped with a good xtrans sensor, it has the right mpx for the quality of the lenses that mount. The menu is a bit like this, the keys often do not remember which function they correspond to so the usability is a little slow. The good thing is the ability to mount vintage optics and some are really great while keeping the focus endlessly. The quality of the files is great, they do not have a great "pastiness" and do not make you dream as much as in nikons that it is another level but they are really sharp in terms of overall sharpness. Of course, the fact that it is mirrorless means that if you miss a shot maybe you really have to read a photography manual since you have the preview of the XD shot. let's say that "just know how to look and have taste". so it's suitable for travel and street photography where you don't have time to reason. The colors are good slightly cold in the car wb so you have to raise the kelvins a little, instead the whites and blacks are very interesting ... sent on March 26, 2021 |
 | Nikon AF 28-80mm f/3.5-5.6D Pros: good, light, good focal hike, balanced contrast Cons: plasticose Opinion: great for doing almost anything, except if you want to blur the background.. otherwise at f 8 is quite sharp. Even at f 5.6 it's not bad. It does slightly barrel distortion but at 28 mm for a zoom is normal. otherwise go like a train! Even for the very light holidays and you bring it very well. The only drawback is the economic construction with plastic grafting. sent on January 22, 2021 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
