RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Misha95
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Misha95



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Misha95


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

fujifilm_xf33_f1-4wrFujifilm XF 33mm f/1.4 R LM WR

Pros: Construction, optical quality and resolution.

Cons: Aperture lock possible only on the automatic and not on every single physically available aperture.

Opinion: Certainly a lens designed not to give battle and outclass the old 35mm f/1.4R, which is taken for granted and with which it coexists in the fleet of lenses currently on the market, but more to position itself at the top in contrast to the competition and give the Fujifilm world a lens at the top of performance, also given the recent ultra-pixelated bodies. Impeccable construction, best-in-class linear focus motor, optical quality among the best for the same focal length. Very few criticisms can be leveled at her, some for weight and size, and so on and so forth, but I have one all for her: the aperture lock set only in the car could be extended on every diaphragm marked and usable by this lens, for me a real lack of the new WR line-up of Fuji and from which even this 33mm is unfortunately not exempt.

sent on December 29, 2023


sirui_am223Sirui AM-223

Pros: Solidity, size, weight and ease of maintenance.

Cons: Release plate, stability when the legs only open at about 30 degrees.

Opinion: In short, at a constructive level it is simple, easy to maintain and solid in all its mechanisms. Stability is its strong point when in all its three sections, at maximum length, the legs are opened at about 60 ° and 90 ° degrees, while at about 30 ° degrees it probably shows its only defect with regard to stability. As for the head (model series B-00K), it also did not give me reasons for complaints, tightened the ball at the chosen angle, this does not move, certainly not a refined solution, but its task does it very well. The only annoying note, if you can say so, is in the release plate (model TY-C10 series), small as a support surface and practically carries with it a shear screw / allen key to fix the body on it, very uncomfortable. That said, I can still praise this Sirui AM-223, on the road it proved to be highly weatherproof and practical in size-weight, in its context it does not regret alternative solutions and is perfect paired with another tripod with twice its size.

sent on March 20, 2023


manfrotto_zaino_pro_light_flexloader_lManfrotto PRO Light Flexloader L

Pros: Dividers, capacity, robustness, aesthetics, configurable shoulder straps, comfortable lumbar belt, warranty with extension up to 7 years.

Cons: Non-removable lumbar belt, price, base weight, not compatible as hand luggage due to thickness.

Opinion: I say just two things, the rest can be found on YouTube and on the site. - Backpack that I consider suitable for working and containing a lot of stuff, it must be configured well for the shoulder straps (these are not sewn directly on the backrest, but fixed by two straps sewn on the shoulder straps and on the backpack, adjustable in height and depth), as well as the chest strap adjustable in height from the attachment of the shoulder straps, the backrest is semi-soft, Deep and wide, the padded lumbar belt is not removable and has a game of inclinations designed on the movement of the person wearing it (the movement is not excessively accentuated). - The semi-rigid dividers are great as they do not make the equipment dance and hold it so that it does not weigh on the rest in a vertical position (I prefer them to the classic, soft solutions, which unload the weight to the bottom and crush the equipment). The divider system rests internally on a rigid bottom (which gives rigidity, shape and protection to the entire backpack, including equipment) removable, removed this communicates directly with the back pocket even expandable in depth (we go from 30cm deep to 35cm extended), useful especially if you want to bring more gimbal equipment or a laptop even 15 "(if we really want to say it all, in the PC compartment in extended version in addition to photographic equipment, there is a 15 '' 2cm and a MacBook Pro M1 2021 14 ''). - In short, the backpack is big, big, heavy, robust, sewn well, (in mine, ordered from the manufacturer's website, some surface burrs of the seams, finished with the lighter), gives me a semblance of being the extreme of a photographic backpack, less instead for prolonged trekking itself, although presented evident comfort and in a certain sense claims towards that field too. - At the cost of sacrificing size, it is undoubtedly a backpack for those who have specific needs in terms of equipment, safety and work, at most it is accompanied by a hybrid or small backpack and you have all the versatility you need.

sent on November 29, 2022


fujifilm_x-t2Fujifilm X-T2

Pros: File quality, pro body with excellent operation in the field, used price, not very intelligent and very manual.

Cons: Autofocus, autonomy, system settings.

Opinion: In summary, it still performs well today, and is satisfactory for the photographic-qualitative field on the aps-c sensor segment (until now there has not been a qualitative evolution of the file sufficient to sanction the definitive sunset, indeed!). Where it really suffers is the autofocus, autonomy, various subtleties and shortcomings in the system settings. Overall, on a budget below 500 euros there is everything in the most absolute sense, especially for the novices of the Fujifilm world or as a spare body, going up in price loses the reason to be purchased at the expense of other similar more performing and intelligent. His strength lies in his "little intelligence" given his release period. Let me explain: you will have to use it and not her to do for you, an excellent school against laziness and practical technical improvement.

sent on October 15, 2022


fujifilm_35mmFujifilm XF 35mm f/1.4 R

Pros: Optical rendering (blur, detachment of planes, sharpness).

Cons: Autofocus (also with the performance boost provided by the latest bodies).

Opinion: It is difficult to describe this 35mm (52mm on ff format) without talking about the suffering it can cause because of the old autofocus, and the excellent resolution in the center of the frame, excellent not excellent at f / 1.4 and home at the edges, in practice its little brother 33mm outclasses it in everything. The factor of greatest incidence is the autofocus, slow, imprecise, noisy in dynamic situations (af-c) and in non-optimal lights, this also called in relation to the boost with bodies such as xt3/4 and later. Understood and digested this limit, more or less serious depending on the use, the photos it churns out are still impressive, you also want for the old optical project and the not perfect resolution and you find yourself enjoying its blurred, the detachment of the soft planes and an excellent three-dimensionality based on the distance person / environment. I see it well as a lens for controlled scenes, less for dynamic ones, it must be thoroughly tested without starting from prejudices and comparisons with the most modern optics for obvious reasons, otherwise they are money thrown to the wind.

sent on August 02, 2022


fujifilm_x-e4Fujifilm X-E4

Pros: Size, file quality, aesthetics, overall speed.

Cons: Dimensions for use with flash and large optics, found overheating and presence of hotpixels, included.

Opinion: Removed the merits brought by the fourth-generation X-Trans (general reactivity especially on the autofocus module), this body divides the masses, not because it is bad in itself, but for prejudices and sacrifices deriving from a truly more compact body live than from web images, as well as making "minimalism" its workhorse, while the masses want absolute overabundance brought to extreme excess. In summary, it is a compact, but with excellent performance equal to its older sisters. If you want to make a criticism of this is precisely because of its body, one ring less from the previous generation, fewer keys from the previous generation for smaller and little exposed on the surface of the chassis, overheating and consequent hotpixel in long sessions of use, prohibitive in certain photographic contexts such as sport. Recover everything or almost everything, depending on personal tastes, via software with the classic customization of the keys and a strong incentive to take advantage of the Q menu, this aspect is not to be underestimated because it actually recovers a lot of gap from the sisters and makes it pleasant to use, you will tell me ''I do not believe it!'' and I tell you ''try it!''

sent on August 01, 2022




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me