|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Diego.armando.parafango www.juzaphoto.com/p/Diego.armando.parafango  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon 1100D Pros: good start, good files, value for money, battery life Cons: low resistance to noise max 800 isolates the rest of a basic entry level Opinion: fun car to begin with was my first SLR, the value for money is good (excellent used now) and it was all "purchase also in 2012, of course we are talking about an entry level basis so after some time that there is passion for photography you will notice the flaws, the noise is acceptable up to a maximum iSO 1000, slow burst and quality of good file, but not excellent, the rest is fun and i would recommend it only to start from scratch sent on January 02, 2017 |
 | Sony A7 Pros: image quality, lightweight, excellent construction, very compact, high ISO, f held Cons: battery, battery charger nonexistent, af moving barrage, sensor gets dirty very Opinion: I am now almost 2 years of use and I think that I do not I will separate! Apart from that I will be very brief ......... the camera for me is very valuable and has an image quality and dynamic range that are outstanding, the detail with good lenses (type 55 F1.8) is super also enlarging the 100% holding very well, the files are lavorabilissimi in raw, good af which is very accurate and fast, it is very well built and fairly robust, the very use mountain also cn bad weather is never a problem, simple and intuitive menu. By contrast, at least in my copy I found that the sensor while being attentive gets dirty a lot, of moving subjects or speed has a good yield even with constant f, does not have the supplied battery charger, the flurry slow .... we say that is a machine that is certainly not suitable for birds or sports, for the rest of portraits, landscapes, street, etc. is to be recommended at 100% and I am very very satisfied sent on February 14, 2016 |
 | Canon 650D Pros: immaginane quality, burst, price, autofocus and a swivel touch screen, weight, battery life, excellent video Cons: building a little plasticky Opinion: for me it is a great SLR: great quality and colors of the files even with the simplest type 18-55 goals, the quality increases spropositatamete with good optics, easy to handle and light with a good autofocus and manageable noise even at high ISO type 3200, as well as lost as much of the "image quality Add more money to excellent levels, the touch screnn is really useful even if all" beginning may seem like a toy and makes good the "idea of ??how he managed the shot, very workable file in post production, all buttons are well positioned and easy access to the touch screen as well as screnn that once made the "habit is very fast in changing impostazioni.rnrnMacchina amazing even in conditions in which I have taken: in the middle of a mereggiata with saline abundant in" air, as in mountain climbing to -15 ° in the rain and snow, desert, etc. Well never a problem and never clean the sensor until now with 13 thousand shots still perfect as well as the battery, SLR stra recommended!!! sent on March 03, 2014 |
 | Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Pros: sharpness, brightness, stabilizer, versatility Cons: weight, price, building, distortion at the edges, flare Opinion: I use it for about a year with great satisfaction, 95% perfect clean images and razor sharp images, excellent brightness and is also an all-rounder that lends itself to many uses from landscape to portrait, the street and another, and the 2.8 "is help shots in low light even freehand, good seal on the market of "usato.rnPer known as rigurda the mourners are the price in relation to construction (plasticky) is very high, the weight that is remarkable, that the flare is exaggerated I really suffer a lot, and in my case I find excessive distortion at the edges. rnrnNel whole I am satisfied of the "purchase, unfortunately if one day you decide to switch to FF you are forced to sell sent on January 07, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 35mm f/2.0 Pros: Size, weight, price, sharpness, excellent image quality, brightness, space-saving Cons: af noisy and inaccurate in low light, lack hood Opinion: I have this great lens for 4 months about the "I used on aps-c canon 1100d 650D and I must say it is amazing for the sharpness, color and brightness images come out really good, it is really worth it, even on the basis of price not esagerato.rnla build quality I would say that is quite good, the "AF type diesel engine precise day, but (at least in my case) with little light in 90% of cases you have to go to the AF manuale.rnLa lack of hood is a sin, but it is just on-line if you're shooting a pò.rnSu Aps-c is a bit long becomes a 56mm sent on March 05, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
