| sent on August 11, 2014
Pros: Image quality, good yield up to ISO 1600, ergonomic body, touch screen, 5fps burst, 9 focus points of which 9 cross, (something still a entry level) screen swivel.
Cons: Materials, steps away from a stop in ISO ISO manuals, dial modes much and unnecessarily "overcrowded", IQ high sensitivity, low resistance to adverse weather conditions (humidity, snow, rain), time buffer, lack of white balance manual.
Opinion: I purchased this camera following the breakup of the electronic components of my old 600D, a veteran of four months spent photographing continuously. At first I was very torn between the home buy a better camera, the 70D type (only serious alternative to this series, however, already quite advanced) or to riaquisto the 600D. The fateful moment came before departing for Kenya, when my supplier has assured me that the right choice for me was this machine. It is now three months since the operation and I can certainly say that it was the right choice. Let's start with the pros in detail: rn (1) Image Quality. Although the statistics show that the 600D is slightly more developed under this factor the 650D is certainly not back showing off a 18.5-megapixel sensor that gives sharp and well contrasted with the objectives of the medium-low livello.rn (2) high yield ISO. It holds up well to ISO 400, at ISO 800 there is a slight grain but dry, fine and easily correctable, especially with the gooduce. As for the values ??as high as ISO 1600 and 3200 can be easily used for photos destined to end up on the web or for small prints, the image quality here is good despite a slight loss of detail. I personally have never gone beyond the 3200.rn (3) ergonomic body. Having tried the 600D, the 100D, and 5D Mark II say that for me this is very good on the factor ergonomico.Cade perfectly in hand, the buttons are all in the right place and there is a wide freedom of control on the various buttons For me it would be useful also a display screen settings like the one on the cover mount cameras more advanced (60-70D), but it would be asking too much for this reflex.rn (4) Display. About the touch screen I can only speak well, is a technology that has been recently applied to the most sophisticated SLR canon and, despite being just became part of the cameras, it seems to me an excellent addition, with almost nothing that can not is already foreffect. The fact that then this is also tilting of 180 degrees is especially useful when trying to get different perspectives. So a big plus point that distinguishes this reflex from the typical entry level as the 1100-1200D.rn (5) Other specifications. This camera also features a burst of 5 fps, many for a APS-C medium-low. Obviously, however, it does not enter the Olympus of the blasts as the reduced size, since it is up to 7DII with 10 frames per second, but it's still a good result if you want to get a good shot naturalistic. Among other things, we also find the classic viewfinder has 9 AF points, but 9 of them cross (3.4 in most of the 600D 5.6) that provides for accurate focus despite the reduced availability of punti.rnPassando cons instead: rn (1) Materials. Although the 650D looks good aesthetically and is very ergonomic materials I find them a little by entry level, category to which non appartiene.rn (2) Mode Dial. I find thisdial mode of another point against the 650D. There are an infinite number of settings and different settings which I think most of the owners of this camera will use it and not just once. So I can understand 3:00 to 4:00 automatic modes but ten are way too many. Furthermore, some are just ridiculous and give the feeling of having to do with a camera looking entry level.rn4) sensor. Despite being a fan of this sensor now evolved performance and I think it is still possible to improve the high sensitivity without getting already at ISO 800 noise a little annoying, especially in light conditions difficili.rnrnIn conclusion I think this camera is aimed at an audience of advanced amateurs or at least to those looking for a serious approach to photography, to others who want a camera body just to take some pictures or sporadic fotoricordo recommend more the 1100D or 1200D, with the same sensor but more affordable. Instead those seeking the famous "quantum leap" from a 500-600D or a 100DI highly recommend you to evaluate the alternative of a 70D, now one of the best in the world aps-c canon.rnCosa I wanted more from this camera? First, a better performance at high sensitivity and the ability to select the ISO steps 1/3 stop, a dial to select with all mod creative and a few automatic, some point of focus in more, to get at least 11 and a screen for displaying settings on calotta.rnMolto consigliata.rnVoto: 9.2 / 10 |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
