|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Falconfab www.juzaphoto.com/p/Falconfab  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | LG G5 Pros: beautiful screen, more than adequate performance, today's price (~ € 300), the highest level camera, fingerprint sensor, replaceable battery. Cons: In truth no one. However I report these peculiarities: Android by LG might not like, modularity little value that gives a certain feeling of delicacy, lacquered aluminum cover that looks like plastic (it had been brushed it would have been much better). Opinion: I claim that I own an LG G4 and that I took the LG G5se (smart edition, they have reviewed something but the performance remains the same as the normal version) for my dad, I must say I was pleasantly surprised. The design quality is very high and the screen remains an eyebrow. The camera is the same as the LG G4 but does not affect the age and even the excellent file (even raw) files. Android by LG turns out to be very "brandy" but nevertheless well-optimized and customizable. "The commercial choice to focus everything on the modularity and the far too high launch price has led to a mediocre commercial success. However, for 300/350 € today it is possible to get a top last year's range (half the price) that ensures a top-of-the-line experience. RnrnIf you are tired of the questionable commercial policy of Samsung, you do not want to spend an exaggerated amount, you do not trust too much"This is a high quality, mature and elegant product that I feel comfortable to advise. sent on May 02, 2017 |
 | Nikon Coolpix P5000 Pros: Robust body, overall quality, quality of photos. Cons: I never had a great feeling, only jpg. Opinion: This machine is definitely very well done. It has a robust body, pleasant to the touch and high quality. The small integrated monitor is adapted to the needs and the quality of the photos, in the right conditions, it was amazing. Unfortunately I never liked using it. The menu seemed to me always confused and too many mpx have always been a risk to the micromosso.rnNon I can only say that this camera was not worth its cost but to me it was not love. sent on October 12, 2014 |
 | Canon PowerShot S400 / Ixus 400 Pros: Size, photo-quality, easy use. Cons: Only jpg, photo quality, tiny sensor. Opinion: I have great memories of this fotocamerina that was really small and manegevole. In 2003 he accompanied me on a motorcycle coast to coast in america. Its 4 mpx were more than enough for divertirsi.Peccato which is broken only after 3-4 years of use but has also been in the desert so I would not blame him sent on October 12, 2014 |
 | Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM Pros: Price, aperture, low noise, fast af, stabilizer (actual yield 2-3 stops), color rendering, sharpness cental, lens hood, soft case, lock 17mm focal lengths, which is important Cons: Softness side ta (up to f4), hsm without ftm. Opinion: The usual bright, to date, there are three more palatable. Canon / Nikon, great but expensive (720 €). Tamron, good and extraordinarily economical (280 € 380 € smooth-vc) and sigma, just below canikon, well balanced but it cost about 600 € at the time of the reviews of the author. A sudden fall in the prices of the Amazon, has allowed me to buy it at 325 € (ss included). RnrnHo immediately noticed the quality EX. I have verified the absence of f / b focus. And I started to shoot. Compared to the 18-55 quite another planet. Bright, an af inaudible and fast. Less heavy competition, with a front lens worthy of respect and a flawless construction. The feeling on the 50d was immediate. Even the lens hood (criticized in some reviews), however, is the real surprise was eccellente.rnrnMa soon as I opened the photo on lightroom. In many cases, they are equivalent to the canon 50f1.8 (which is known as a fixed excelled by quality). Already at full aperture, the central area is clear, well-contrasnanny and enjoyable. I must say that many photos can also be used without adjustment of tones and colors. A small flaw is the softness in the side when shooting wide open (f4 already in the problem goes away). In fact, however, when using a wide aperture, usually, there is the subject close to the central square (rule of thirds / golden) to make it stand around with bokeh, therefore, in practical use, this defect only becomes a peculiarity that must be taken into account to avoid placing the subject areas estreme.rnrnLa vignetting and distortion (which are in accordance with normal light), rather than contained the 25mm, are well corrected by the programs of pp, then do not consider them pros do it contro.rnrnrnSono very satisfied and would recommend vivamente.rnrnP.s. the price has gone up around 400 € but remain the most advantageous choice. sent on December 18, 2013 |
 | Canon 1100D Pros: Ratio Q / P unbeatable, small, light, excellent file quality, beautiful color rendition, simplified menu, Cons: Plasticky, handle too small, Opinion: The right step to start. Do not listen to those who recommended xxd to deal with the first steps. Obviously, higher-end cameras have more features, but for beginners, they are paid very dear unnecessary features. The quality of the photographs is not remotely comparable to the compact. Even with the worst of the optics will see a drastic improvement. rnrnQuesta small canon has everything you need to get started and find out if passion for the hobby of photography takes you. For at least 2-3 years you will not find a limit in the body macchina.rnrnVoto quality photography: 9rnVoto robustness 7rnVoto innovation: 8rnRapporto Q / P: 10 sent on August 21, 2013 |
 | Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM Pros: Build quality. Ratio Q / P Angular field. Central sharpness. HSM. Saturated colors and natural. Housing and lens hood included. More than one Editor's Pick show that those who are not satisfied with the photos that churns out probably more than buying a new lens, it needs a good book ... :) Cons: Normal brightness, sharpness and lateral deformation. Opinion: The feeling is that you are holding a Canon L-series lens, without being gutted. I do not regret the two mm difference in the sigma 8-16 simply because in real life you do not often drops below 12mm. As for the image rendering is superb, I find it amazing the colori.la lateral deformation is marked, this must be remembered when you position your subject. The excursion 10-20, is convenient because it is unable to move from a superwide (with the typical defects of nasoni) to a lens that handles well also persone.rnL 'only lens that may be more desirable is the tokina 11-16 f2.8 because the two stop advantage determinanti.rnrnNel can be complex, considering the price, it is one of the choices migliori.rnrn sent on July 17, 2013 |
 | Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II Pros: Ratio quality / price, size, range of focal lengths, weight, bokeh. Cons: Hood, af a bit 'slow in low light, in relation to any price. Opinion: Well, everything is good or bad if it relates to its cost. According to this rule in question is the optical incriticabile. With 190-200 € (€ 130-140 new or used) you bring home a zoom from discrete optical quality and construction, lightweight and compatto.rnAnche when you exit where you do not plan to use a cloth, keep it in the bag is so undemanding that "it is worth." rnrnSe then compared to the various economic 70/75-300 you see around, all doubt disappears because this perspective makes his home in very good figura.rnrnOvviamente canon the 70-200 is a must with characteristics far superior but much more cumbersome and expensive .. Overall I would recommend this lens rnrnNel to all holders of asp-c. The inexperienced because they can experience at a very attractive price, producing, however, beautiful scatti.rnA who is experienced but often uses this range of focal lengths, would recommend to complete the outfit for an occasional use. rnPer who does wildlife photography can be a'Excellent back-up unit or to use in difficult conditions where the bulky and expensive biancone is less adatto.rnrnP.s. The lens hood sucks. sent on January 03, 2013 |
 | Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II Pros: Sharpness, versatility, economy Cons: Brightness, af slow, building just enough Opinion: Versatile photographic tool that is well suited to be a bit 'of everything. From portraiture to paesagistica the street. Being a bit 'dark absolutely must be accompanied by something brighter. rnrnOltre to what has already been said by people more experienced, I would add that if you drop it you can take one of 2 ^ hand 60 €! rnrnQuindi, who is a beginner, can experience light-hearted without spending a fortuna.rnrnConsiderando worth the low cost a bell'8! sent on December 22, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
