|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Mgk www.juzaphoto.com/p/Mgk ![]() |
![]() | Panasonic GX9 Pros: Compact machine lightweight sensor of excellent quality idela for photography travel system autofocus excellent and versatile ability to work the raw in the car Cons: The battery does not guarantee enough range you have to buy other batteries lack valid program to work raw files Opinion: I took this machine body to use in travel and for general use. The machine body is very light and compact. I associated this machine body with the olympus optics. The file quality is great. I found the Raw management programmes offered by panasonc to be lacking, in my opinion not only satisfactory. The plug in to view with windows raw files gave me a compatibility error with wiindows 10 so I gave up on intallarlo. processing the Raw file with Raw camera I noticed an increase in the grain of the image compared to the file processed by the same machine. considering the use that I make of raw files with the same machine without making use of the PC. I find this function very convenient but still with many shortcomings. The Gx9 does not allow you to use this feature when connecting an HDMI monitor, it would have been much more comfortable to use an external monitor during this mode. Another flaws the inability to enlarge the image when working a Raw file in the machine. With a small screen they had to provide the ability to enlarge a detail during processing. Battery life is not enough for a daily photo output, so you have to expect to buy some other battery as well. I noticed, however, that the battery when it passes 50% of the charge then suddenly gives way turning off the machine so it is difficult to calculate how much time is left. consider also that the sight of the machine was made in my opinion only to insert it into the characteristics of the machine but it is as if it were not there. Too small and of poor quality. I always use it with the back screen. on the back screen I have to note that under the sun the screen is not very bright is does not have a brightness option suitable to photograph under sunlight function provided in the dsony A7r3 and A7r4 I think even of different price ranges could opt not to Put a useless viewfinder and provide the car instead of a usable rear screen comfortably even in the sunlight. overall anyway for in relation to the sale price is an exceptional machine I took it with the offer which provided a discount of 200 euros and the panasonic 50 lens as a gift so I would say it's a bargain considering the image quality is excellent and 20 mega pixels all in all are enough. The machine is fun to use, allows you to exit without a camera bag putting camera and lenses in the pockets of the jacket. I found excessive criticism on the noise and graininess of the produced file sent on March 17, 2020 |
![]() | Samyang FE 35mm f/2.8 AF Pros: compact cheap light in relation to price you can not look for the fur in the egg Cons: the classic exceptions that can be found on economic optics Opinion: if you do not have high claims for what it costs is not bad with a targeted post production many flaws will conceal without too much trouble. An optic that you can buy for those who have expensive and heavy 35 mm to use as a lens to assemble when you want to photograph in conditions at risk of damage to the lens. I used it with the sony A7r III which with this optics takes on the size of a compact. I managed to put it all in the phone bag of the bike. I think that samyang with this lens has hit a double lens that of those who do not want to spend big sums in optics and want a travel optics that marries the philosophies of the mirrorless system and that of those who have challenging and thinking lenses. I for example i have the 35 mm f 1.2 Art which is an opticof great quality but it is certainly not an optic stomp to take around by bike or boat with little money I have an optics that turns my sony into a compact and I do not have to worry about the damage or clutter. For what it costs has a great yield sent on November 15, 2019 |
![]() | Samyang AF 18mm f/2.8 FE Pros: compact price and size Cons: rendering of colors and contrasts in the absence of sunlight Opinion: l I tried on sony A7r III along with the 35 2.8 mm as a kit to carry around when I do not want to bring the sigma Art I took shots on a day of cloudy skies in the alleys and in a market the rendering of colors and contrast in those light conditions I have to say that it was poor, in post production you can improve but this applies to all optics. what I had in the test in autofocus did not hook the faces but with the spot pointer was quite effective. for what it costs I recommend it to those who have expensive lenses and want a lens to take to any place turns the sony A7 into a compact lightweight species with the 35 mm 2.8 has entered the phone purse that I keep in my bike. As a main lens I do not recommend it to those who have very high resolution machines. I also recommend it to those who do not make constant use of pushed wide-anglers and for the cost it is worth having sent on November 09, 2019 |
![]() | Olympus M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8 Pros: light light compact light Cons: Nobody Opinion: The 4/3 format for me is the ideal format to use for trips where you do not want to have clutter weights allows you to get off with laying times. an olympus micro 4/ 3 can not miss also because the quality is not lacking for common uses and the system is very cheap. I keep it as a machine for the whole family who wants to use it uses it sent on September 09, 2019 |
![]() | Sigma 35mm f/1.2 DG DN Art Pros: the full-opening quality is already very comfortable the diaphragm diaphragm dial on the optics and the focus lock button, well-corrected color aberrations in the photos I did I did not find this defect Cons: I could write dimensions but physics dictates that for large openings you need large diameter glass so for me it's not a problem. Opinion: I bought this optics to complement the art optical series for the sony A7r III I own the 35 f 1.4 L of Canon that I have been using for so many years with the Canon 1ds Mark III a very good lens that for years has given its satisfactions. The canon, however, at full opening is affected by a lot of chromatic aberration and drop in resolution let's say that under 2.8 I tended not to use it. The Sigma 35 Art 1.2 is already fully open, for f 2 already has excellent sharpness even the contrast and the color rendering on sony A7r III is excellent. bought on offer with a 15% discount https://www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=3302428&l=it sent on August 26, 2019 |
![]() | Sigma MC-11 EF/Sony Pros: Works great with Canon 24 f 2.8, with the Canon 35 f 1.4 L, with the Canon 70-200 f 4, with the canon 85 f 1.8 Cons: doesn't work with the Canon 300 mm f 4 Opinion: I bought it recently used with all the Ef optics in my possession. I use it with the sony A7r III the LED does not turn on I think that LED is working for Sigma optics with canon attack. The only lens that from problems is the 300 F4 stabilized with this optics does strange things that make it unusable in autofocus. with the other optics also works the subject's hooking system I had tried others that did not work with all my goals. With this sacrifice the 300 mm that in any case it is not that it is then comfortable to use the long telephoto lenses on mirrorless systems if I have to make shots with the pushed canvases I will continue to use the Canon 1ds Mark III. In the end I bought it to use with the sony the compact and lightweight lenses 24 2.8, 35 f 1.4 and 85 f 1.8 vouchers to take on the road with the Sony A7r III there is everything in a light handbag. all three weigh less than a single sigma Art lens in my opinion for those who make sports photography or action the Reflex remains the car to prefer to mirrorless, but to carry on the road or around a sony A7r allows you to have high quality images with little weight. If one has to carry heavy optics then so much worth you bring the reflex sent on August 21, 2019 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me