|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Lufranco www.juzaphoto.com/p/Lufranco  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Photoseiki TB-101 Pros: Perfect construction - Maximum hardness - Excellent fluidity Cons: Weight and clutter Opinion: Nothing to say, it costs a lot, but used for 5 years and already used, it supports my 500 f4 as it was on the first day. With extraordinary fluidity and no play. Though I never treated her with white gloves and used it often in mud and water. A guarantee for our heavy Supertele.rnOra photoseiki reopened is again the Gimball par excellence. sent on November 20, 2017 |
 | LG Nexus 5 Pros: Pure Android is constantly updated, stability, reliability, speed Cons: A little battery (with the latest updates go waaay better), no memory expandability Opinion: In August 2015 still use a Nexus 5 and I prefer it to all the other terminals on the market, including those who are more powerful on paper, why? RnPerchè optimization and cleaning software makes so much difference that in normal experience d ' use other high-end handsets, including even the new ones, you will seem less potenti.rnNessun Lag, no blocking, no locking no program to open another or which opened by itself and no nothing. He needs to do he does. All'istante.rnrnUn plus is having Android and all apps google updated light years ahead of others and for years! Not they, that you buy top of the line, I'll update in biblical times a few times and then when the next model comes out you arranged! RnPensate on average receive 1-2 updates google app a day !! rnrn sent on August 03, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Pros: Construction, Image Quality, Autofocus, Stabilization Cons: Nothing Opinion: After passing the FF 3 years ago and have abandoned the beloved 10-22, I did not know what to take. Fortunately in the meantime has produced this canon wide angle spettacolare.rnNon I still used a lot, but in the first test I noticed a excellent image quality even up to the edge already f4 and also 16mm. Thing in the wide-angle zoom canon had never visto.rnCerto, some distortion has it, but nothing incorrigible or disumano.rnPer regarding the flare, in the first trials against the sun, against artificial lights placed directly in the center or at the corners , I could never find any. Maybe diaphragm chiusissimi and in certain special situations can mostrarne, but for now I never visto.rnPer regarding the atofocus is immediate and extremely quiet. The stabilizer is phenomenal. It allows shots with times impossibili.rnLa construction then is good, beautiful, very solid and very pleasant to tatto.rnEccellente. sent on June 23, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 2.0x III Pros: Total lack of aberrations and vignetting, much less the other 2x. A hair sharper especially at the edges. Cons: The price. Fortunately some sample used is. Opinion: It 's the best 2x multiplier never tried it, but as obvious as it is, does not do miracles. Always a 2x it. Its construction is excellent and also to look inside you immediately notice that the work done by canon is good. As I said, has the great merit of not adding any type of aberration and does not increase significantly vignetting. Already these two small attentions that make your photos look like sharper and more microcontrastate especially compared to those made with the previous series 2x II. Of sharpness in the most effective, though there is not much more, a hair yes, but not enough to justify the outlay double. Obvious that if, like me, you find it used and if you're maniacs IQ, this 2x compared to the other something more from him. Of course, it should be used with lenses of a certain caliber, or it will cost more than the multiplier that lens! sent on August 22, 2012 |
 | Sigma 500mm f/4.5 EX DG HSM Pros: Price compared to the corresponding Canon / Nikon, excellent sharpness by f5 on, autofocus speed, size and weight still manageable. Cons: Lacks contrast to TA, but already closed 1/3 Stop recovers much, it is not "officially multipliable" but multiplying it by a roundabout route that takes less you notice the multipliers of the other 500mm. Is not stabilized. Opinion: I'm one of the lucky few who managed to find it used (DG version) and I'm very happy. The only drawback is the question multipliers. In canon is only multipliable with various kenko etc. .. but you will immediately notice that the lens loses more definition than would a fixed Canon / Nikon, but closed a stop recovers enough. The autofocus just fine holding the 1 .4 x. Furthermore it is possible that as in my case, the use of non-original multiplier can add a minimum of front / back focus so it would be better to use it on a machine with fine adjustment. Smooth in my case is perfect. Clarity, speed and everything else almost comparable to large super telephoto, with the difference of size and weight much more manageable. Convenient is the fact that the minimum distance of 400cm MAF for photos of passerine birds and small animals in general. Absolute bargain pick used, but I would not spend 4000 euro to take it again. sent on May 21, 2012 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS II USM Pros: 4-stop IS real, fast AF, sharpness and overall yield from Fear. Cons: Weight, price, addictive. Opinion: I believe I have never seen or tried in any of the trademarks photographic zoom with a similar yield. Excessively sharp at all focal lengths and all apertures, made incredibly smooth to the edges even on FF, no AC and very low vignetting, a stabilizer and an incredible AF speed worthy of the best fixed with righetta red. In more multipliers makes as a disk, which makes it very versatile. Finally, the minimum distance of 1.2 m maf, together with the overall yield multipliers, making it great for beautiful closeup. If this is the rendering of the new super telephoto L canon, I can not imagine the new Series II from 300 up what they can do. Defects? Goal despite being fairly compact, weighs, it weighs a lot and is felt early in his arms, but is often encounter. The price even talk about it since its absolute value. The construction is impeccable and excellent equipment. There is a lens hood, tripod ring and carrying bag. I got it despite being an amateur photographer also because I imagine that in 10 years is still worth the same amount as it is unlikely to be improved. There was the button, I put 11 as voting lens. sent on October 07, 2011 |
 | Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Pros: Sharpness, Stabilization, Auotofocus, Focal Range. Cons: Resistance to Flare, Built in relation to the price, weight, price. Opinion: And 'no doubt the lens that most use. It 's just perfect, clear already from TA, dwarfing many of the fixed lens (except for some L). Mount a stabilizer 3 stop allowing shots unimaginable, but also has a fast autofocus and very reliable. E 'a lens that environmental conditions in part, represents the perfect lens for matrimonialisti and various professionals who do not intend to use FF. It never fails and always makes you take the shot home. Simply does not exist either on aps-c nor a lens on FF equivalent. The biggest flaw is that its NOT resistance Flare. It suffers a lot, and this is not suitable as a lens to the landscape. Finally, for what it costs could be built a hair better, if only a guarnizioncina to keep out the dust before they could put it there. sent on September 25, 2011 |
 | Canon 40D Pros: Reliability, value for money, burst density sensor general ease of use. Cons: Not equal to the new aps-c at high iso, no video nor latest features like micro af. Opinion: It 's still my favorite car. It 'a forklift, the port anywhere without hesitation at all. Solid and very reliable. It has a fast and accurate enough af a flurry of respect. And 'well-used up to 800iso, and from 800 to 1600 at the end it comes out well with a minimum of PP. His 10Mpx are great to be processed without the need for PC octacore and out of the car already discrete. Obviously does not have the latest features like video, etc., but has the liveview which is a godsend. For what it costs is still worth a lot. E 'in my opinion currently the best solution to start shooting on a budget and having a lot. sent on September 24, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
