|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Bass3d www.juzaphoto.com/p/Bass3d  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM Pros: Excellent construction, "magical" effect in the right conditions of use, reliable focus. Cons: Embarrassing chromatic aberrations with wide openings. Expensive Opinion: Particular lens, it has a rather grumpy character... Many say it is hardly tame. In my opinion it should be used in very precise conditions to give the best, otherwise, it basically disappoints, or at least does not make for what it costs. I bought it to use it at full opening on 5d MK4, otherwise I would have taken more, saving nice money. In the right conditions it actually gives the magical effect for which it is famous but, autofocus aside, nothing more than glorious vintage lenses (Super Takumar on all). The look of the images is always very "analog", perhaps also because it is not a hypercorrect and optically "perfect" lens like the most modern ones. Very soft at full open, but it's not a fact due to the depth of field... it's just all soft. Closing to f4 everything is fine, but at that point everyone is capable, or almost. What bothers me most about this lens is the exaggerated chromatic aberration up to f2.8 for the backlight subjects; to correct it, the edges of the subjects are affected. With diaphragms closed, the images have a great contrast and detail. The autofocus is very honest, reasonably fast but above all accurate. Love, for the moment, has not sprung. sent on July 10, 2019 |
 | Samyang Premium 85mm f/1.2 Pros: Three-dimensional yield, sharpness, colors Cons: Focus ring difficult to clean Opinion: Lens that I find fantastic, gives great satisfaction in its use, which can not be anything but meditated. The manual focus for me is not a flaw, also because using it to the notable openings for which a photographer buys it, the autofocus would often lead to disappointments. So arm yourself with tripods and LiveView. The beauty comes when you open the images: the detail in the areas in focus is very noticeable, even at full aperture. This, together with the fuzzy creamy and intense, helps to get the 3d effect that everyone is mentioning. The colours are rendered in a natural and pleasant way, almost pictorial. I would only change the material of the MAF ring; Although excellent for its purpose, the grip of this kind of rubber makes it difficult to clean; For the rest the mechanics of the ring nut is perfect. The lens is big and heavy, the frontal lens greenish is remarkable, it is certainly not unnoticed, as do not go unnoticed the giant prints that we can achieve with great satisfaction. The use also on panoramic head for images with the effect "brenitzer" that give me great satisfaction. sent on December 29, 2018 |
 | Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: Sharpness, even at full aperture, very effective stabilization, price Cons: Maybe the weight, but it is a natural consequence of its features. How evil the (my) arms after two hours the Scarrozzo. Opinion: Excellent lens, well-built, large yield, nice blurred and razor sharp. The autofocus is not the first in the speed class, but you can not 'have it all. Value, like almost all Tamron lenses in recent years, can not be beat. Definitely, it does not go unnoticed, given the size. The less pleasant is the weight, but if you want a lens like this, there can be no alternative. sent on May 31, 2016 |
 | Tamron 15-30mm f/2.8 VC USD Pros: Sharpness scary, super colors, absence of aberrations, stabilization, resistance to manual flare, 5 year warranty. Cons: Flashy, big. Opinion: It 'a fantastic lens, the sharpness is really incredible. Observing the display images on 6d, at maximum magnification, you do not have the feeling to have them enlarged, so much sharper. Optically I not know what to get him defects. Some time ago I watched admired the pictures taken with the Nikkor 14-24, the reference lens in that segment (so far ...). Well, it seems that this Tamron will be taking his place, in many respects is definitely on another level. The much-maligned cap, does not seem bad, rather it is a simple and functional way, to plug. With Canon, especially if there is a deep hood, it is a precision job they snap. The inability to mount a human price filters, for now I do not care. Certainly does not go unnoticed, in front of the bulb and the diameter are noted. sent on February 08, 2016 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: Quality at high ISO excellent overall yield of the sensor very good, the central focus that engages even in very low light, features Wi-Fi and GPS as a reference. Cons: Protective plastic display Opinion: I purchased as a replacement for the 6D 7D; I must say I am very happy with the change, because I find in 6D some features that I missed a lot in 7, the cleaning of the files in low light, first of all, and I have lost a few that I do not consider essential for my photographic genres, such example a burst rate double. I find the 6D a machine designed intelligently for those who want a full frame from the affordable cost, without having to face the cost is not affordable for all budgets a 5DmkIII. Obviously saving leads to the compromessi.rnLa 6D has a sensor from the yield remarkable, able to work at very high sensitivities with little-very little noise. From this point of view, the gap with the 7D is really evident. Shooting, especially in silent mode, it has a nice sound and professionale.rnL'autofocus has only 11 points sensitive, pretty little scattered, on the other hand the central one is really able to allow the focus with very little light. This, for many types of photography, can'Be more' important compared to having many more 'points, but less sensitive. The machine holds good, is not colossal, indeed, it is also appreciably lighter. Have not been able to determine if the materials it is made of are "cheap" looking pro, or good unpretentious; time will tell. I have no idea of ??the level of weather sealing, and I do not want to have to put it to the test. The display is bright and clearly visible even in the sun. I do not like the fact that it is detached from the "glass" external. The latter, in particular, is a plastic panel, with anti-reflective coating, perfect to make visible fingerprints or capture cheeks flushed. Much better the reinforced glass "gapless" the 7D. rnI buttons are logically positioned, who has already had a Canon, in ten minutes is operational. The rear wheel multifunction is not bad, not great either feel the lack of the joystick. Someone complains about the lack of '1/8000 second shutter time, useful per use optical light wide open in full sun; I think it's not a problem, since there is a 50 iso, the 7D for example not aveva.rnWifi and GPS are by reference; currently there is no other machine with all the features of the 6D, in this area; in particular the possibility for full remote control via smartphone or tablet can 'be utile.rnNiente hurt the ability to log gps of all trips; also works with the machine in the bag, inside the trunk of the car. rnL'autonomia is very good, it drops a bit 'with the use of GPS, and with the refresh rate of the latter, which remains active even with the machine off. It seems illogical, but it is not, since all the gps need time for the fix, so if you would not be extinguished more 'can quickly regain the position. And 'precise and also indicates the altitude. Missing bussola.rnLa burst is not particularly fast, about 4 ftg / sec. All other features of the machine, burst apart, are practically istantanee; the 6D is always very reattiva.rnNon feel the lack of a second memory slot, definitely absent to save on costi.rnNulla objection particularly for the video industry; the exceptional sensitivity it is noted also in this case. It is sometimes visible moire ', that there is on 5DMkIII, which pays this benefit at a lower resolution of details more' fini.rnAnche in this area, the gap with the 7D is quite obvious; The videos evening or night are really very clean and piacevoli.rn sent on April 03, 2015 |
 | Canon EF-M 11-22mm f/4-5.6 IS STM Pros: Sharp across the frame, excellent contrast, silent autofocus and effective stabilization. Resistance to flare. Metal body well done. Cons: Need to unlock it from the closed position to the ring fotografare.rnManca of distances. Opinion: Lens design very modern, effective at all focal lengths, even at full aperture. I find that the images obtained are better than standard EF lenses as the Sigma 10-20 or the Canon 10-22.rnL 'irritating aspect according to me, is the necessity of having to unlock the front through the actuation of a button and while rotating the zoom ring, quite slippery due to the metal construction, utilizzare.rnStabilizzazione before it can be very effective, even for video.rnLa focus at infinity is almost impossible at night, since it lacks an acknowledgment of distances, making photos of cielo.rnOttimo difficult for photography of landscapes and architecture. The deformations are fully acceptable to a wide angle so spinto.rnVignettatura and chromatic aberration are corrected very efficiently and automatically by the machine. sent on October 14, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
