|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Bgar www.juzaphoto.com/p/Bgar ![]() |
![]() | Sony A7s III Pros: DYNAMIC RANGE, feedback, Af, sensitivity, customization Cons: sd/cfa door Opinion: Machine Voted absolutely to the video but not to be excluded for photos. Surely you do not choose it if you are only photographers, but I believe that in the photographic field the real plus is that this machine, except for mpx, is infinite. It allows you to make mistakes and still take home the result. Then it must be said that all the mental physios on the mpx we only make them we photographers: a beautiful photo is composed well and is pleasant even with 6 mpx (except for those who need to print big). However these 12 mpx are at least 24 from the results but with the plus of an infinite dynamic range. The AF coming from Mom Canon is great but different, Canon is softer and more pleasant, if you work in excellent light conditions, but as soon as the light is scarce it gives up first. On this a7s3, however, he never gives up but is very nervous. On the other hand, I applaud the quietness of Sony's AF engines: very quiet. Of course you need to know what you buy but it is a camera that allows you to enjoy the photographic experience by always taking home, and I always say, the result; maybe not printable in A2 but what other machine allows you to take the milky way freehand? Or even to shoot it in a video? Do we really need 50 mpx in normal use and not still life? I don't think so (although of course they appeal to all of me included). Color science is much better than older models, not yet like Canon for complexion, but otherwise excellent. Negative note: that honestly makes my nose twist is the counter of the sd/cfa: very waterproofed but poorly built, it remains semi-open since the waterproofing rubber pushes it out. Excellent viewfinder and screen although I would have liked a larger screen and not with this type of junction: more like the A1; no one sane self-resumes with an a7s3. sent on March 25, 2021 |
![]() | Canon RF 50mm f/1.2 L USM Pros: All the pros of the ART series of sigma but the colors and softness of the old 50 mm 1.2 L EF Cons: It costs a lot and makes even what is ugly become beautiful Opinion: Guys try it, if you tried the 24-105 rf and you were disappointed by the construction and the feeling... Well this is another thing: solid, sharp, beautiful aesthetically, on the R fits just fine. The blur is soft creamy although it remains very sharp even at 1.2 (you buy it to use it at 1.2). The autofocus? Magical, fast and soft at the same time. the dial of the focus did not make me afraid but trying it is just zero-lag. It looks mechanical from how ready she is. For lovers of the 50 mm you can not ask for better are the best 2300 euros ever spent. If you can't afford it I recommend you try it anyway and make some sacrifices because it's a must have for EOS R owners sent on February 19, 2020 |
![]() | Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Speed, full-opening sharpness, construction, blurry (hard but I like it) Cons: Not tropicalized, you'll f---ing want to buy more fixed Art. Opinion: Now it is a few months that I bought it, I use it on Eos R, not wanting to say the mere technical data I dwell on the sensations: it is a blade, both as a definition and as an ability to capture soft and metaphysical light that filters sideways. It churns out files so rich in detail that it has to remove them if necessary and therefore also allows important crop. The blurry is not creamy but it is worth considering that it is better to be a lens that churns out a file still to be maneuvered rich in details rather than already conpped and half ready (for me at least). the only flaws I would like to say is that the lampshade is a piece of plastic and in very close portraits I happen to have to further correct the profile of the lens by increasing the distortion value to the right. I am aware that it is a problem of 50 in general (in fact I also bought the 85). For the rest it is a pleasure to use it, in hand it seems to have a full metal rod, well balanced, beautiful also aesthetically and on my R performa as a god. sent on December 15, 2019 |
![]() | Canon EOS R Pros: First of all the materials, the new RF lenses, the quality of the raw (only that I know by not shooting in JPEG), the general speed in the data processing, perfect compatibility with the old lenses ef, digital viewfinder. But above all the white balance, Canon ah... Like you do no one. Cons: Few for me who are just photographer and not videomaker but actually apart from the crop in 4k that we are sincere... Few can benefit from the 4k nowadays (still early), a good full HD is much more enjoyable. But beyond that I feel to say that the screen tiltabile to forward from fully open is not parallel to the machine of some degree, I do not know but from €2300 more adapter I expected was straight. Patience Opinion: I state that I come from a 5d III, excellent machine but the quality of the file and the speed of everything is below this EPS R. I honestly don't understand why everyone has criticized her. It's a great camera, it's good for photos if you're looking for a camcorder take a camcorder. Often compared with the Sony (A7III) and never having tried it I can not judge but this EOS R does its thing. Only flaw that I feel I blame him apart from the single SD, which I do not feel the need but I understand that the marriage would make good use, is in addition to the price that you pay and salty the screen is not perfect in the mechanism of rotation but are inezze. It was a car does not happen. He makes great pictures. Maybe less sharp than the 5div but the quality understood as noise, colors, workability is exceptional. Even the recoveri from light and shadows are incredible, try to believe they are incredible. I will post on my profile night photos taken with her from 800 ISO to 6400 and do not notice difference after a slight post. Ah, it's not a sports car. Leave the specifics alone and try it out because there is so much substance. sent on March 07, 2019 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me