|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Ruggine71 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Ruggine71  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon 5Ds R Pros: Files with extraordinary detail; Ergonomic machine body, solid and beautiful to the touch; Super Autofocus Cons: None relevant; Maybe an excessive number of useless functions for me. Opinion: I have been using Canon's 5 Series for many years. I had the 5d old, the MkII, used several times the MKIII. The 5DSR constitutes in my opinion a further step forward than the previous versions, at least for my way of photographing amateur. I only do landscapes, I will have tripped 3 times in my life over 600 ISO, camera almost always on tripod. I don't need ultra reactive autofocus and a machine gun gust. 3 \ \ 4 of the 5DSR on-camera functions I do not consider necessary, including videos. I obviously seek the best image quality possible so this sensor attracted me a lot and did not disappoint expectations. Never had such detailed and well-contrasted files. Combined with good quality lenses and shrewdness in the shutter settings, it produces exciting results. I have posted one or two test photos for those who want to get an idea of the files that churns. sent on June 17, 2018 |
 | Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L USM II Pros: Brightness, strength, sharpness (center image) Cons: Price, made the edges, made in 35mm Opinion: I had this lens and used it with satisfaction. But I gave in after 6 months of ownership to buy the 17-40 + 70-200 smooth and I do not regret it at all. From a zoom so noble and expensive I would have expected more. Great for those who need a diaphragm f2, 8; under these conditions returns file disappointing. Very well indoors. But if you have to use diaphragmed has nothing more than the 17-40 that vivmente advice for the best value for money, of course this is my experience. My copy had a yield at the edges or at least not up to par with the 17-40. A 35mm I found the same probelmatiche other members who have commented. Excellent sharpness in the center of the frame and colors. No comment distortion at 16mm because I like a lot to the effect creatifo that you can get. It 'a very good zoom, but I would recommend spending only to those who should require the aperture. sent on December 10, 2011 |
 | Canon 5D Pros: High image quality; proper density of pixels; robustness Cons: 2.5-inch screen insufficient quality and size of the burst Opinion: If you do mostly landscapes and portraits and you realize that you use the camera from 50 to 200 ISO in 90% of cases, which almost always use the center focus point and you do not need super-crop then the 5D MKI is the camera for you. Under these conditions, the file returns a cleanliness and quality that can compete with Nikon D700 and 5D MKII and perhaps even the most noble flagships. Outside of these parameters may alert the length of the project, especially if you're used to all electronic servo-assistance of the newer cameras. For my part is still excellent up to ISO 800 but I would not go over. The 5D I tried it with all L-series zoom common: 16-35II, 17-40, 24-105 and 24-70 and even comparing it to the sister I have not found a more recent image quality at different ISO values ??reasonable , with telephoto lenses still do not know if the 100 macro particular differences I have not noticed. Strongly tempted to do the upgrade I decided to wait because I hope that a future 5D MkIII has less pixels, more dynamic range, which Sforni files to ISO 800 are the same as those of the current 400 and because to my way of photographing is not a quantum leap. sent on August 02, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
