|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Matteo Bottin www.juzaphoto.com/p/MatteoBottin  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: sharpness at all focal lengths, color rendering, and repeat color rendition, blurred although it is obviously not his strong point, construction, stabilization and openness, and cost rningombri Cons: diameter of the filter (82mm), weight but that 'is unfortunately due to the opening, and from there can not escape. Blurry good but does not have a corresponding level of nikon and canon, it is not weather sealed Opinion: I purchased this lens at the end of 2014 and it was my main lens to date. The sharpness, color rendering, opening and range of blankets focal does not regret both canikon fees, and the use of fissi.rnLa color rendering of nikon is just spectacular and perfect, not pumped colors and very natural, it is as if the nikon goals that effect had been taken a little pastel, and had been increased color drama, making the colors a bit 'more' main smorti.rnL'utilizzo I made this point was for landscapes and portraits , always getting good results, speaking purely of file quality. For landscaping I have often used the CPL and ND filters, and the use of 24mm filters to create a vignette meccqnica important, in fact I discourage the use cascading to 24mm, 28mm already has the situation improves drasticamente.rnL'obbiettivo A resolution and truly embarrassing clarity aperture interaverage, even more 'I clear my Nikon 50mm 1.4 at the center. The zoom of the problem is always that edge. However, the edges are not bad and very small apertures, by F / 9 up improve so much, even if the sharpness decreases in the middle, but the yield becomes more 'uniforme.rnLo stabilizer is not necessary on a lens of this kind, but in some situation has proved useful, although it is a very subjective thing, however, adds an added value to the lens and is really a plus when you turn the videoclip.rnl'ottica is very balanced, compared to nikon has a more 'large diameter and is less long, so it has a better center of gravity, the construction is very good but does not guarantee protection against moisture and dust, and then do not recommend the purchase to those who are traveling or is often found in unpleasant situations. Although with proper precautions you can 'live the same felicemente.rnrnSe you are not a professional photographer and you can not afford the 24-70 nikon and canon, or simpleMind you want to save money in the purchase I can not help but recommend this ottica.rnrnMatteo sent on April 20, 2017 |
 | Samyang 85mm f/1.4 Aspherical IF Pros: Build quality, color reproduction, sharpness, the focus rings extremely fluid, price Cons: lack autofocus, which is subjective, for canon lack of automated iris control, minimum focus distance, the presence of CA to open diaphragms Opinion: 339; autofocus with a warranty and returns tranquility, especially in moments of fatigue when wrong one click is more 'easy. Then you clear, the manual focus does not discriminate, I weddings with Samyang I've made some pictures and I always brought to casa.rnSinceramente the performance of this optical Nikon d600 I found it very pleasant and very standard natural, colors are slightly cold "out of the room" and I like more 'yield compared to the Samyang 85mm nikon G.rnTuttavia the main reason why I decided to switch to nikon is the minimum focusing distance. shooting with 24-70, 50mm and 85mm, which was very flustrante with Samyang 85mm I fail to have satisfactory close-ups for the focus distance equal to 1m. I managed to have more 'pushed portraits with the Nikon 50mm and this thing I just could hardly sopportarla.rnPer conlcludere I would like to make a comment on the price, the quality offered by this lens with its limitations remains unparalleled, on a scale of 1 to10 the value for money comes from tranquillamente.rn scale sent on April 11, 2017 |
 | Canon 550D Pros: good image quality in the context of a reduced size (APSC), small size relative to the line xxD and higher, held iso acceptable, excellent value for money especially in used, self-cleaning sensor, weight Cons: gust, autofocus are fine for normal use but forget to go photo hunting or sports photography with this machine, or better you can do it every time, but for use in that branch of photography are recommended other modelli.rn18 megapixel are too many, in my opinion, the ideal would be 16 as nikonrn Opinion: It 'was my first SLR, which was acquired in August 2012 after more than a year of use I can say that was a great acquisto.rnper a person who enters the world of photography or videomaking this machine offers all the possibilities, of course with the its limiti.rnrnL 'autofocus is fast enough for normal use that does not include photographic hunting or sports photography where suffers a little bit, in difficult lighting conditions sometimes find it hard to make fuoco.Iso acceptable up to 800, as well as the photo must be processed to eliminate the rumore.rnrnper regard to the weight and bulk is great, if it were too small body as you can buy a battery grip to parte.rnrnPiena software compatibility magic lantern that adds a number of features not little, as the focus peaking, bracketing, interval timer, bulb set at will (you choose the time), video in hdr absolutely eccrnrnConsiglio this machine instead 600d/650d/700d because the savings are significant, the machines have subsequent improvements minimum,on display .. with the money saved you can buy good optics, the 18-135 I lasted two months and then I was forced to sell it for the dissatisfaction sent on October 01, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
