JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Fujifilm XF 10-24mm f/4 R OIS WR is a wide-angle lens for APS-C, manufactured from 2020. The focus is done by Stepper Motor, it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 920 €;
20 users have given it an average vote of 9.2 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Fujifilm X-mount: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Fuji.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Cons:Certainly not the ideal choice for photographing the Milky Way. Sometimes 10mm can be a narrow wire, the ideal would have been 9mm Wide side. Sometimes I sometimes want a minimum focusing distance of about 5cm less, especially when I have very small flowers in the foreground. It may have a slightly higher resolution.
Opinion:I have been using this lens for a few years, used both on 24, 26 and 40 Mpxl sensors. I manage to take home the shot on 90% of the occasions. The construction is top of the class, and the dimensions are just right. Contrary to what you read, the resolution and sharpness of the lens are very good, for pixel peeper and fans of hyper realism who then upload the photographs to Instagram this is not the right lens. For everyone else it can be an almost closed-eyed choice. Sharpness at the edges a little back from the center, the question would be, how often do you have an important element in your image in the corners? Recommended for all landscape photographers! P.s. The variation of the angle of view during focusing is very limited, so you can do excellent focus stacking without finding the photo cropped in post and having to rack your brains about how to compose the image at some focusing distance, not a small detail, for example in the past I used a Tamron 15-30mm 2.8 and it happened to me more than once to throw the shot at home just to this reason.
Pros:Construction, tropicalization, compactness, possibility of mounting threaded filters.
Cons:Sharpness at the edges/corners is poor already at 10/20mm focal lengths, which improves (not much) only by closing down to f8. At 24mm the sharpness is insufficient even in the center.
Opinion:Enthusiastically purchased the new tropicalized version in 2020, on XT4 I immediately encountered the unacceptable defects described above. It was then replaced by the 8-16 which, although with much larger dimensions, weight and price, was decidedly superior. However, on the XH2, even the 8-16 showed real resolution limits, which led me to change the system... But that's another story.
Pros:Sharp, small and light, and above all it holds well the 40 MPX of the XH2!
Cons:Slight drop in performance above 20mm. Usual plastic hood and aesthetically unwatchable.
Opinion:I use this zoom from the first output of the non-WR version. I have always liked it for its great versatility, lightness and not exaggerated size. Moreover, having had at least 4, I have always had excellent copies and they have never given me problems, except for the physiological drop in sharpness, especially at the edges at the higher focal lengths. But from 10 to 18 mm has always been a blade already at TA and up to f8. I must say that this new version, despite having the same optical scheme as the previous one, even on the XT3 seems to me to have a sharpness and a higher microcontrast. In short, the impression is that it is really very, very sharp. And the beauty is that it does not lose anything even on the 40 mpx sensor of my XH2. I am very satisfied.
Opinion:Excellent wide-angle lens, nothing to complain about. However, it has the flaw of the diaphragm "only" F4 that in some situations is limiting. It wouldn't be a big problem if it weren't a new nearly €1,000 optics. The yield is excellent, as the sharpness at least up to 18, then drops a hair but nothing striking. The construction is really good, no game, great materials, WR, very well done.
Cons:Front writing can be annoying when using Photo Filters against written reflected light.
Opinion:Arrived yesterday made a series of tests. I must say the doubts about this perspective were many in the past I had more than one pair of the old 10-24 that I or criticized very hard variation qualitatively pairs and mechanics. The 10-24 WR Fuji designed for landscape photography where closing diaphragm I expect at f5.6 / f8.0 maximum yield even at the corners. I must say it does not disappoint at all or maybe or had luck to find a perfect couple. The tests that either made the sharpness really very impressive at focal length 10 mm but also at 24 mm where many criticize it I do not or found significant drop I would say perfect. On the old pairs of the 10-24 I had serious problems especially at focal length 24 mm the AF went crazy on the new seems perfect the AF tried manual bezel but perfect what I want sharp I find it excellent even on the infinity where with the old 10-24 was problematic ok they were all a can decentralized the pairs I had. Negative point I still find the writing in front on the optics can happen using backlight filters to find reflection of the writing I'm thinking of covering it with some black tape. Personally I make this observation the optics not at brightness f2.8 so not for astro photography indicated low brightness and I also say not for reportage photography better a fixed lens. Very personal or read on some forum Fuji I do not know what Fuji to fact same construction lenses as on the old 10-24 but it seems different more contrast and sharpness I also put myself with this consideration I do not know but perhaps a small improvement in lens treatments. For me one of the best lenses ever from Fuji super sharpness even at the angles at the level of the zoom pro f2.8. Note: at 10 mm slightly wider angle wider field than the old 10-24 Fuji but perhaps only the reason to Capture One not updated to the latest version so lack of lens profile. Not a cheap optics my couple anyway bought used but at least my couple really perfect and I'm over-happy. The 10-24 WR is better than the 8-16 for what concerns flare side light. On closer distances you can see that different behavior is better on long distances a landscape lens, or also found slight advantages on long distances compared to the zoom 16-55. Another observation the 10-24 WR reaches maximum quality at long distances with closed apertures or noticed according to the focal length even more external corners sometimes soft closing at f8.0 disappears completely. It can no longer be missing in my 10-24 WR backpack when I do landscape photography together with my new 70-300 + Fuji X-T4 really incredibly excellent and super stabilized when needed.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.