|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Wallygator www.juzaphoto.com/p/Wallygator  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM II Pros: Flare, sharpness, MAF Cons: Front lens hike Opinion: I have several L-series lenses, I love them with their strengths and their flaws... This, among all, is not my favorite, it returns images too sharp, all too harsh. The flare is almost non-existent. I would say the only drawback, is the frontal hike. I don't always shoot with tripods, so I don't feel the lack of stabilizer sent on March 14, 2019 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS III USM Pros: Flare, sharpness Cons: Nothing Opinion: I owned the 2.8 II, it was practically unmanageable when used for landscape under grazing light, the ghosting made the frame illegible and the flare was very marked. Finally, with this update, the problem is solved and, at first impression, the images are much more faithful and sharper than the previous model. As an update, the aesthetics remained unchanged sent on March 14, 2019 |
 | Manfrotto 405 Pros: Stability and precision in the frame Cons: Weight, but it's worth it... Plate Opinion: Recommended for landscapers, once proven becomes irreplaceable. Simple and smooth in quick, precise and fluid movements in the finishing movements... You'll be able to find the perfect framing of your images immediately, without the risk of unwanted movements. Requires an important tripod, gitzo in carbon is his death. It is heavy, but comfortable to carry in tow, the plate is bulky... It would be to be revised in size, but the graft is very fast and extremely safe. I've always had high-level easets and heads, for me it's the best sent on February 28, 2019 |
 | Canon EF 11-24mm f/4 L USM Pros: sharpness, focal length, flare resistance, use of slab filters, very low distortion, chromatic rendering, construction Cons: Vignetting with 11/12mm slab filters, not attributable to the lens and easily resolvable in post Opinion: A lens that returns in satisfaction the economic commitment made to purchase. The chromatic rendering, the sharp detail, the resistance to flare, given the size of the front lens and the absence of particular distortions, are a pleasant surprise. The maximum aperture at F/4, does not make the lens suitable for astrophotography, except this, is the best wide lens on the market. Coupled with the 24/70, I was led to the sale of the 16-35, which suffers more distortion, despite the minimum focal less extensive sent on February 23, 2019 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
