|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Lucas88 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Lucas88  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EOS R Pros: Construction, EF adapter ring, electronic scope, dynamic range, orientable display, focus, face/eye recognition, customization, file quality. Cons: Crop 4k, location of the USB C cable that locks the orientable monitor when used with gimbal stabilizer, single memory slot Opinion: The Eos R is a machine that takes the shooting experience to the next level, more yours, simpler, more immediate, igo from landscapes to weddings, to theatre to night life and the Eos R never stands back. I am very happy with the purchase, I took it with my eyes closed but I am really very happy, I am recommending it to everyone ! I haven't tried RF optics yet, already with eF is a bomb!! Coming from a 6D 1 what impressed me the most is the focus that can be used perfectly continuously without losing a shot. Mirrorless for everyone! sent on October 05, 2019 |
 | Fujifilm X-T20 Pros: Portability, af, sensor to be an APS, aesthetics Cons: File quality when compared to an FF sensor (thanks, but there is this general idea that these files are comparable to a good FF), for long services after a while the small handle becomes painful, time needed to switch from LCD to Viewfinder, blurred given by the sensor aps Opinion: I took it to support my canon 6D and always carry it with me, for this use is perfect, the complete replacement with a FF is still not feasible for me because of the sensor, in case you get a fujifilm FF then you could to do with your eyes closed, for me the real big flaw of the xt20 is the sensor, not because it is not an excellent sensor, indeed, is that after years of FF I have a good eye, also I shoot often in low light and that's why I prefer 6D. rnqui a more complete opinion compared to my 6D: www.facebook.com/notes/luca-concas/reflex-o-mirrorless/1665184066875979/ sent on January 04, 2018 |
 | Sigma 20mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Sharpness, aperture, wide angle Cons: Af incoherent, heavy Opinion: I was satisfied with the test case at home, a lot, I made a milky fast way, very happy, suffering some coma on the edges of the stars, but imperceptibly if it does not enlarge much, the problem arrived during the wedding 4 hours ago it worked perfectly, perfect fire at 1.4, then without a reason I was wrong all the fires with subjects not very close, about 5 meters away ... pity, now I try to fix it with the Dock, optically it is very good, the Mass In the fire was precise and fast, pity decided to go crazy at some point sent on July 26, 2017 |
 | Tamron 15-30mm f/2.8 VC USD Pros: Sharpness, 2.8, price, ease of use, rays in closed-loop sunshine Cons: 15mm almost 16, bulge weight, tamron assistance to understand, the lens easily fits in the center Opinion: I came from 14mm Samyang with whom I always found very well, I changed it because when I photographed with the sun in the scene made the rays in a bad way, the new is appreciative and from that something in the sun. Sharpness is at very high levels at the center that you have edges, compared to the Samyang 14 is much easier to use because the top floor is almost always in focus, it is difficult to explain. I bought the Haida slab system with which I find myself very well and is perfectly matched with tamron, always in comparison with the 14 has a more delicate and visually beautiful flare. I would recommend it, the only real flaw was the Tamron service which on the one hand only spends 180 euros more if it falls and destroys you on the one hand I sent back an optic after 2 months with the lenses off the axis ... so one Part was in focus one part, the left was out of focus. Votes 8 out of 10. The millimeter less than Samyang feels, though taking our hand% 26egrave; Something unimportant, another problem, which is seldom and only in some conditions is the fogging of the lens at the center and internally, so it is just waiting to be taken off, annoying problem if as I get in the good place and with the conditions Good at last;) sent on May 05, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Pros: Sharpness, f/2.8 aperture, build quality, AF is not bad even for non-macro photos Cons: missing the lens hood, however, sold separately Opinion: This lens has been a revelation, it is a perfect lens, razor sharp wide open, robust and cost, I got it used in perfect condition € 250, there is also a version L stabilized, but at the level of image quality they are . If the lens is a must have if you want to do macro, very good for non-macro photos with fast AF and good brightness. sent on January 03, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Pros: Relatively inexpensive, focus faster than canon 50mm 1.8, fuzzy good compared to 1 .8. Cons: Many individuals suffer from f / b focus, f/1.4 is not very sharp. Opinion: This lens is like a pebble in your shoe, I had the first version of 1 .8 and the difference to be honest you do not notice, I always use it to 1.8 and never TA because it is too soft, you can not crop if used in TA is all very very mixed, 1.8 better, but nothing shocking. I took it for a better af, but here I was a little disappointed. sent on January 03, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
