|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Viaggiatore65 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Viaggiatore65  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Samyang 12mm f/2.0 NCS CS Pros: Construction, lightness, clarity, price and excellent color reproduction Cons: I found none Opinion: I bought this lens for Fuji XT10 to complete my optical equipment, for the type of photography I find it amazing that I prefer very sharp from edge to edge, of course you have set the camera to take advantage of the software fixes and enable compatibility. Photos taken are very sharp and full of detail, used for architectural photos gives you files with a very low distortion while in landscape photo color reproduction is just fantastic. Be careful when using the aperture from f / 2 to f / 2.8 because it tends to blur the image a lot plus we must treat very manual MAF to avoid unpleasant surprises (slightly blurry subjects), from f / 4 onwards by putting the focus on infinity you'll have no problem of depth of field and focal planes. I would highly recommend the purchase of this lens to the weight (it is very light) the cost in relation to the image quality and very precise mechanical and treated. sent on April 04, 2016 |
 | Fujifilm XC 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS II Pros: quality / price ratio, sharpness and lightness Cons: No one saw the cost of the lens Opinion: I bought this lens kit with Fuji XT10, I was already aware that the construction of this lens was all plastic, but just mounted on the camera I had to reverse, the graft is without force and they do not have the game between ' bayonet and lens, the zoom ring is also very smooth and pleasant to the touch while the ring MAF is a bit 'small and for those with large hands may be uncomfortable. rnUnico drawback to this objective, and that does not work with LMO (lens modulation optimizer) that is located inside the camera software as the optics of the XF series, the rest has a very good sharpness almost uniform throughout the frame except to 16mm where one notices a small decline on the frame but nothing irricuperabile than basic lens supplied as original equipment on SLR cameras and not only, can safely confront optical medium / high qualità.rnGrosso advantage is that having a good quality, is the '; Ideal lens for travel and the long marches in the mountains where the lightness of kit for me is very important without having to give up to bring home a lot of clicks buoni.rnIl its range of use where returns some good shots is between f / 5.6 f / 8, as well starts to go in diffraction, of course, it has some limitations in very dark scenes but it is not only due to optics "dark" but for me that predominantly daytime shooting is not a problema.rnNegli indoors does very well and it returns colors and sharpness of good qualità.rnConsigliato for the really low price for its handiness and lightness without compromising on the quality of the shots, now you can find it on the web again to € 169. sent on February 01, 2016 |
 | Samyang 8mm f/3.5 UMC Fish-eye CS II Pros: Build quality, sharpness, color reproduction and quality / price class leading. Cons: Nobody Opinion: Purchased in 2014 to complete my outfit I think that today there is a lens with this price-performance lenses with higher cost, I use it on a Canon 70D and I must say it has a high clarity despite the angle of view (classical clarity from fixed focal) .rnNaturalmente this point should be used carefully and sparingly as being a fish eye puts you in front of the eyes unusual perspectives and the advantage over other fish eye and that is not circular but diagonal, in fact correcting the type of shot you can get views to the horizon very straight but with an angle of view crazy. It 's very fun to use in architecture which will give you very specific shots and uniche.rnParlando of optical performance, the sharpness is at the top and works well from f / 3.5 to f / 11, the pictures in strong outdoor light should underexpose the frame 1 STOP to get the correct exposure, color reproduction is good but well balanced, suffers slightly flare in cotroluce but never so grave that it can not be corrected in PP.rnInsomma if you want a quality lens at prices from basic objective is not to hesitate to buy it with your eyes closed !!! sent on July 05, 2015 |
 | Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC OS HSM Macro C Pros: Construction, sharpness, autofocus very fast and accurate stabilization, competitive price Cons: A little weak at the extreme edges of sharpness in the range between 17mm and 24mm Opinion: I purchased this light at the end of 2014 and I can be very satisfied, at present the use of a Canon 70D and I must say that the combination of the camera sensor with this lens is perfect, too bad about the extreme edges of the image there is a loss of sharpness (only between 17mm to 24mm) after which the images are very sharp throughout the frame. What impressed me was the sharpness achieved between 50mm and 70mm that is worthy of the best goals in commercio.rnLa stabilization is excellent and allows you to shoot with a steady hand even at 1/8 second without risking camera shake, the colors are quite neutral and detail to detail is great, the range of diaphragms where the lens from its peak and f / 5.6 to 8 who then diaphragms DOC for APS-C cameras when taking panorami.rnSe are undecided of that optical shop for APS-C I recommend this for great value for money !!! sent on July 05, 2015 |
 | Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Pros: Build quality, color reproduction, sharpness even at the edges, not overexpose ever, resistance to flare, size / weight conteneuti Cons: Hood sold separately I would also expensive Opinion: I purchased this light last year to complete my outfit on Canon 7D and I must say that the performance is very high on par with the series L. Files baked are fantastic for sharpness, color and exposure (high / low lights) not overexpose never frames even under bright lights and except in very special cases the flare is absent. The autofocus is very fast and accurate, but one of its strengths and almost no distortion at 10mm whereas all the other objectives of the competition are not able to achieve the results of Canon.rn Another strength is the sharpness of the edges frame, I would say there is a great loss of definition very acceptable that gradually goes attenuated by increasing the focal length (14mm is already almost absent), the only flaw is the lack of the hood as standard and if by chance you buy l ' Original touches you spend from € 32 to € 40.rnAnche though quite expensive, if you have the budget to buy it I highly recommend it because the market does not exist una lens with this quality apart from the Sigma 8-16 which has excellent performance but insufficient focal length. sent on January 17, 2015 |
 | Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM C Pros: Color reproduction, stabilization, sharpness above average and price Cons: If I have to find fault, does not have the full time MF Opinion: I purchased this light for a second kit lighter and practical, use this lens on a Canon 7D when I visit the city or travel where there are the possibilities of being able to make changes in that given its optical zoom range gives me the opportunity to seize several details. Things I have impressed are two, first stabilize very effective and precise, the second is the sharpness unthinkable for a lens in its class, the images appear more defined and the photos are not mixed in the background plus playback Color is really good even at 200mm (considered that I shot mostly in RAW) .rnIn truth I was very skeptical about the quality of these objectives handyman, but I must say that with the Sigma series Contemporary has made great strides, along with this perspective I also bought the USB Dock which gave me the opportunity to download the latest fimware available, also you can also make fine adjustments AF directly coNo program Sigma.rnIn nutshell if you want a view to travel or to stay still occasionally lighter recommend this Sigma that surely will give you file really beautiful !!!! sent on January 17, 2015 |
 | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: Stabilization excellent sharpness even at 300mm, quality / price ratio Cons: Sometimes when you turn the camera does not start autofocus Opinion: I purchased this light in 2012, and what impressed me at first use is to stabilize highly effective and visible in the eyepiece of my camera, allows you to shoot easily even at 300mm at 1 / 50th of a second without micromosso.rnAltra peculiarity is the sharpness I would say very good even at 300mm and fully correctable in PP from 70 to 200mm is sharp like a knife giving files very well exposed with excellent resolution, but it is nice blurred (not mixed), not suffer from flare and not overexpose the foto.rnLa zoom ring is very smooth and the hood is well made weight is fine since the zoom range. For the type of photography that I prefer is perfect (still photos), but if the request has speed limits in both AF precision (I use it on a Canon EOS 7D) .rnA my opinion on the market, there are objectives that are at the even (especially for the price / quality) considered that the Canon 70-300 L costs 4 times as much, ifyou do not have to meet the sporting needs advice absolutely. sent on November 02, 2014 |
 | Fujifilm Finepix X20 Pros: Quality construction, excellent high ISO performance, excellent JPEGs and ready to use, fast AF, good manual control, excellent ergonomics and optical quality. Cons: Battery life is insufficient, cap lens cover only usable with the machine off when it fits with the optical viewfinder part of the scene is covered by a portion of the target. Opinion: I purchased the X20 towards the end of 2013 and currently use it as a second camera body, I used both for indoor and outdoor scenes and I was very surprised at the quality of the files sfornati.rnDato that its sensor is 2/3 "therefore smaller than the micro 4/3 and APS-C, its strong point is the depth of field as the reduction factor of the sensor compared to FF is about 4X, this means that using an f / 5, 6 and as if you were working at f/11 with a huge advantage when you do indoor photos flash.rnPer regard to the functions, are so many but the most interesting are the simulation of Fuji films used a lot when I had the analog SLR, you give a feeling of a time gone by that I find very piacevole.rnCon this machine does not feel the need to shoot in RAW as JPEG files are already very detailed and rich in details and have an exposure latitude unthinkable seen the category into which is inserted X20.rnPer the fault of the lens cover I solved by purchasing a filter;or D 40mm UV cap and a non-original plastic, for me not to miss anything, I also bought the hood metal Fuji.rnUn last comment on the 2X digital zoom, which under ideal light works very well (of course along with the stabilizer image) is able to achieve good file with a minimum loss of sharpness recoverable in PP.rnSe I can afford to give an opinion that is a subject to which we must not give up, can be used as a second camera body or even seen the body as the only 'focal length range that is suitable for a large part of photography, but this car is recommended to those who photograph has already seen a good experience adjustments and the countless possibilities it offers. sent on January 06, 2014 |
 | Canon 7D Pros: It has everything in his favor Cons: Since I am not interested in the movie section, it is something that I find unnecessary. Opinion: I replaced my EOS 30D in 2012 with the EOS 7D, the leap was significant from all points of view and with this occasion I also renewed the park ottiche.rnLa output of the sensor is amazing even at the edges of the frame thing very important to me that I prefer panoramic photos and architectural and the advantage of APS-C sensor is just the basic depth of field in my case, I add also the reduction factor of the sensor compared to FF which allows you to have more trips in focal according to the focal utilizzata.rnPer take full advantage of this machine it took me about a year since the infinite possibilities of adjustment (especially adjustments AF), as its settings are machine professionale.rnUno of the things that impressed me was the brightness and the sharpness of vision optical viewfinder with 100% even in low light situation you can not always understand what he's framing, but also the LCD screen 3 "is no joke, its clarity and veracity of the image and &serious, so awesome that I can not find a big difference compared to the PC monitor (IPS). rnPer regard to noise at high ISO, I have not found all of these issues set out in the various articles, up to ISO 6400 files are still quite clean and can be used (with a good PP greatly reduces the noise), I agree with John Fiorenzo that you have to make comparisons to print your photos in a professional way which of course I did, and believe me, the quality is very high even when shooting at high ISO, unfortunately the PC screen you can not see this thing and then enlarging the image are lost as many Mpix screens today do not support resolutions greater than 1920x1080P except some TV broadcasting images 4K.rnA my humble opinion, the EOS 7D remains a point of reference in the world of the APS-C and if you really want to make a qualitative leap in the highly recommend it, when you can use it to its full potential will give you excellent file. rn sent on January 06, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
