|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Abarth89 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Abarth89  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Manfrotto 190 GO! Pros: Compact, stable, both maximum and minimum height Cons: Embarrassing twist system. Opinion: I have been "using" this tripod for about 4 years. Stable, compact, discreetly light and adjustable in all ways, making it suitable for all types of photography. I put use in quotation marks, because I don't know if it's a defect only of mine (which I hope with all my heart), but the twist system is nothing short of shameful bordering on useless. When I extend the arms, I have to unscrew it to the end and slam it 2/3 times to unlock it, to close it every time is a battle, I have to unscrew the screw totally, push the telescopic very hard to the end, hoping to be able to close it, otherwise I have to pull out the locking system, close and then reinsert it. I already did this when new, I also tried to clean the legs with a cleaner, give a drizzle of grease to the locking system, but everything I tried never gave results, so much so that now I keep it open and when I want to use it I take it and put it in the ski rack of the car and use it only occasionally. I ordered another one with a lever system that instead I have always found wonderfully good (always with manfrotto) dust, mud, water, never had a single problem and always worked wonderfully. I'm just sorry I can't get rid of it, 160€ wasted. For me I vote 9 as a tripod, 1 for the twist system sent on December 28, 2024 |
 | Nikon AF-S 20mm f/1.8 G ED Pros: Weight, general yield, flare resistance, construction quality also alse plasticosa, 1.8 Cons: Cost, not tropicalized Opinion: I have been possessing this lens for quite a while, I bought it for photo releases where I can afford to bring the REFLEX. I use it in my little ff kit which is 20 and 50 both 1.8. I preferred them to a zoom lens for weight, both are much lighter than a 24-120 for example, and it would also allow me to have an almost 85, still having much higher quality. The lens is fantastic, not too open, not too closed, easily transportable, has an excellent yield, if you then close at 2.8 from already the maximum of itself. I feel like recommending it to those who want a high-performance, light optics, which can be used in landscapes but also at night. The only negative note is the price, in my opinion too high for its range of use. sent on March 22, 2021 |
 | Nikon D500 Pros: Pro machine, ergonomic, autofocus, burst, pro viewfinder, control arrangement, a D5 mini Cons: It is a Nikon, the car focus in live view is obscene, touch screen not complete, rendered over 2000 iso, xqd cards, nital price Opinion: I have been owning this machine for a couple of years now, I am very satisfied with it, the use almost exclusively for photo hunting animals, not by capammo, you appreciate the power of autofocus, a missile and very precise, it manages to catch fire even when you are taking photographs of birds among the branches of trees. I almost always use it in combination with the 70-300 af-p, waiting to have some money for the 200-500 brother, but in my opinion the car is spectacular. A downside in my opinion is the yield when you go beyond 2000 iso, the files are still workable, but the noise starts to show, and if you are not experts in Photoshop, it begins to become a problem. Another negative note is the xqd cards, now rare and at exorbitant prices, price that is another weak point of the D500, too high, if you do not only do birdlife or sports, but you want a great car in everything, I would stay directly on the 7000 series. sent on March 22, 2021 |
 | Nikon AF-P 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 E ED VR Pros: Speed of focus. sharpness, weight, performance in general, spectacular VR. Cons: Focus in unintuitive manual, although still effective Opinion: I'm using this lens mainly for birdlife, and I have to say that it really impressed me, the focus speed is awesome, for the value for money it has in my opinion is fantastic. nothing to say, fast, precise, sharp and even the construction looks good. Also excellent is the hooking of the lampshade, precise and with dry click. I also used this lens for portraits with I have to say really great results. I really recommend it, but be careful about the compatibility of the body with the AF-P series. sent on April 12, 2020 |
 | Nikon D5600 Pros: lightness, display, ease of use, small size, great sensor, 39 autofocus points Cons: The proximity sensor keeps the touch on but not the monitor when you look from the crosshairs, so sometimes you touch the display with your nose and move a few parameters, ridiculous buffers, Opinion: Bought to take advantage of Nikon's cashback to get rid of a goal, with the intention of selling it, i was literally surprised. It works that is wonderful, very light, very small, I took it with me practically everywhere leaving the 7200 or the 750 often at home preferring lightness (especially when I go on the mountain trails). The autofocus is very fast, the 39 points are comfortable and there is also the possibility of touch to focus that is not cheap. The monitor is spectacular, I wonder why it does this kind of tilting only on this machine and does not propose it on the others as Canon has done for years. The dial is nice soft but precise, the possibility, the customization of the keys does not make you regret the second ring, using the machine in a or p is very comfortable. Unique precisely from my point of view, the real difference from the other its there is notice when doing photo hunting, the burst is also acceptable (if not in live view) but the capacity of the buffer is really limited, even using the lexar 1000 that I still do 5/6 photos and already you're still. But moreover, it is still an entry level, so for me it is approved with flying colors, I definitely will not change it, it is easier that I will sell the 7200 than this! I highly recommend it to anyone who wants to enter the world of reflex photography, but also to those who would like a mirrorless in their kit, go and see it because it is worth it! sent on August 08, 2019 |
 | Sigma 150-500mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Pros: Price used, good quality, stabilizer Cons: Autofocus a little slow, slightly dark, noise stabilizer especially in shutdown, F/V Focus Opinion: Excellent telephoto lens, taken used today is a nice low cost tele from the overall good optical quality anyway. Not excels in AF speed, lacks the AF limiter distance and the stabilizer is quite noisy, nothing but when it shuts down it makes a TAC almost noisier than the shutter of the machine, which obliges to be careful with certain avifaunistic subjects Very sensitive to any suspicious noise. Overall however I recommend it! sent on January 12, 2019 |
 | Nikon D7200 Pros: All. Speed, file quality, build quality, double SD slot, AF also with internal motor, no fears altitudes and temperatures, gust, semi pro body. Cons: Autofocus in Live view, fixed screen, lack of protective plastic on the monitor as on the ancestors (D90, for example) Opinion: Passed from D90 to this, it seems to have made the move to another planet. Very fast machine, autofocus impeccabole that does not miss a shot (as long as you do not use it in Live view) 51 points of mass exploitable, quality of the files and possibility of recovery, excellent tightness at high ISO. The double SD slot then allows you to not miss even a photo. I am very satisfied with the machine, combined with quality optics from its best without making a mistake. The only cons I have found is the slowness of focus when using in Live view, which is very slow and in the hunting Avifaunistica is not the best for the rest, is straconsigliata. sent on September 29, 2018 |
 | Tokina AT-X 11-20mm f/2.8 PRO DX Pros: F 2.8 constant, sharpness even at TA, general quality, lightness and size, compatible thread filters Cons: Spin annoying, and if you can define against, the switch from af to mf inconvenient Opinion: I use this lens since last October, I got new on the internet at € 400 (offertona !!) I must say that amazed me, the quality of the images it offers are spectacular. I took him to Rome with me thinking of keeping it as a second lens for the museums, mounted just arrived I did not change it anymore. The possibility of reaching 20mm allows to exploit it in many fields, from inside to outside. It's a lot of flare, but it can be easily solved by slightly changing inclination. Excellent also the hood that does its job anyway. rnSecond me is the switch to the fire, because it does not allow microcorrections, but you can easily avoid using the SLR settings. Strangled, then combined with a semi-type my 7200 from the best of itself, pity only not be able to take advantage of full frame! sent on March 11, 2018 |
 | Nikon D90 Pros: Practicality, robustness, built-in autofocus engine, ease of use Cons: Self-focus autofocus, high ISO rendered Opinion: With me for over two years, he has always done his job extravagantly, never had a jam, always worked in all environments, from the snowy to -15 to the sea heat at +40, a simple and intuitive menu, and good readability under the direct sunlight. On the other hand, electronics feels that it is dated (2008), it has "little" native iso ranges (200 3200) and the focus is lentina (especially with the internal engine). It is great to enter the world of semi-pro photography, the external lcd screen is something fantastic, you have all the strictly necessary parameters at a glance, even the autonomy is fantastic. sent on September 19, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
