|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Gianluca Mescoli www.juzaphoto.com/p/GianlucaMescoli  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon 1 J5 Pros: Aesthetics, materials, quality files and sharpness, size, colors, technology, burst, AF Cons: The 4K Opinion: Bought on Amazon with a little discount in silver and white coloring, it's a bomb in all the senses. It's stunningly small and very small in hand that holds very well. The sensor is crazy, it also makes the files (even raw) incredible , Scary colors and sharpness. The AF is impressive, the 179 points cover almost all the sensor and the subject is always and immediately on fire. The 20fps burst allows you to use it as a sports car, only serves a telephoto lens (of series 1 or F attachment with a Adapter) .nnA highly technological and fast all-in-one with the new generation processor, it also has all of the most modern options like Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, gps and, in my opinion, a very useful swivel screen that facilitates operations when The room is down.rnThe excellent kit (10-30) is very sharp and well cost edited The only defect is the framerate of the 4K (15fps if I do not errate) making it virtually useless.rnÉ a perfect machineFor travelers looking for performance in moderate sizeThe price may look high but they are very well spent money, It's a jewel. sent on July 21, 2017 |
 | Sony A230 Pros: Weight Cons: All Opinion: It is a machine virtually useless, it can use those people who want a reflex to make memory photos and have no intention of building something around photography. The sensor is bad, over 400 ISO files are useless, it does not have the lightview and the burst is embarrassing. The shutter is noisy and the kit kit supplied (18-55) is not comparable to the nikon counterpart.rnIf you are looking for an entry level bet on something else, I used this and still use the D3100 and it's all Another car. sent on July 21, 2017 |
 | Manfrotto Compact Action Pros: Weight, price, ease of handling, head fit for both video and photo Cons: The final legs are a bit small and delicate Opinion: I bought this tripod matched with a sleeveless monopod, is great for entry level reflexes and not too bulky camcorders. The head is fluid and is comfortable for video tracking. Vertically it is not easy to use because the head joystick can not tilt vertically completely, but all in all is a great product and not demanding. I recommend to those looking for a tall and light tripod to always bring it with you sent on July 21, 2017 |
 | Manfrotto Pixi Pros: Price, robustness, size, defective quality Cons: Absolutely nothing Opinion: It's an incredible photographic / video stand, perfect for travel vlogs, is very stable and the head (not interchangeable) is fantastic for photography. You always carry it with you, you will never leave it to the world, put it in the pockets of the Trousers.rnIf you are looking for a small tripod for video It is the best one because it can also be used as a convenient pole for photos to match a larger one.rnIf you're paired with a camcorder or a gopro you are comfortable sent on July 21, 2017 |
 | Sigma 150-500mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Pros: Price, sharpness, easel, focus, stabilization, aesthetics and materials Cons: Filter diameter, front-back focus, for the less powerful the pesorn Opinion: It was my first supertelezoom worthy of this name and I still use it. The price is really low for this product range, I found it on RCE photos at 450 € with all accessories, in perfect condition and with neonprene cover . The sharpness is excellent, loses slightly to 500mm at opening 5.6. The construction is worthy of a top range, giving you a feeling of robustness and incredible reliability.rnThe focus is really accurate and fast (just set the machine the right way) suffers a bit of front-back resolvable resolution with the dock Usb sigma or with micro-regulation AF in-camera.rn Stabilization is excellent (if coupled with fast shaking kits) .rnI recommend the version with new paint because it does not ruin like the previous version and if you want to preserve it at maximum you put a cover In neoprene. It's a bit hard to find uv filters or good polarizers for that diameter. To start with nature photography is the best in price-quality. Obviously noIt is compared to other 5000 € cans. The weight is superficial, if you really want to make naturalistic photography you have to make a reason because there are no targets with that lighter focal length. sent on July 21, 2017 |
 | Nikon D3100 Pros: Size, weight, price, battery life, perfect for beginners, raw file lightness, ISO 100 details Cons: Lack of a bit more advanced features, beyond 800 ISO files are virtually useless, burst. But for an entry level maybe we ask too much Opinion: It was my first reflex and I found it really good, the size and the weight make you want to always bring it to your table for its ridiculous price to beginners, ergonomics is good and the battery lasts so hard. Lightweight files up to 800 ISO, but beyond the files are useless so it is not a night machine or dark places. Features like bracketing and bursting are really embarrassing but to start shooting it is fantastic straconsiglio.rnTi guide in Photography path and time you learn a lot of concepts. By the time you will reach its limits and you will understand if photography is your passion. RnOttima to travel, I brought it up to Japan and matched to a lightweight optic like the 50mm f / 1.8D seems to have not had it.rn sent on July 21, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 55-200mm f/4-5.6 G VR II Pros: Price, size, filter diameter, stabilization, good AF Cons: It's not very clear, attaching the plastic bayonet Opinion: It was my first canvass and I did not find myself hurt in fact I advise beginners and who wants a canvas to go around. It is not a sharp target, but with a good soft light it does not hurt badly gave me many Nice shots.rn Stabilization is excellent, it's easy to find filters (diameter 52mm) which is really small, perfect for traveling even in the air without taking up too much space, the only flaw in construction is the bayonet that is plastic.rn the focus Is not very accurate but with the right settings it is pretty good. The colors and the contrast are very beautiful. It is not a perfect optics but for the price I would say it is good. sent on July 21, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF 50mm f/1.8 D Pros: Dimensions, price, sharpness, materials, weight, filter diameter, diaphragm opening Cons: If I have to find one .... the lack of the fly (on D3100) Opinion: Paid 80 € new, no defects can be found for this lens. It is very clear, the f / 1.8 aperture makes it usable for night photography, is very small and lightweight it is impossible to never carry it in your backpack.rn the only miss for The entry level bodies are the AF, absolutely not necessary.rnThe construction is great, the bayonet attachment is aluminum and the plastic barrel and the touch do not have any idea of ??toy, the ring of the fire is very fluid And accurate. The bokeh a 1.8 is awesome and does not lose too much sharpness to the most open diaphragms. I recommend to beginners and neophytes, but also to street-photography amateurs or semi-professionals, portraits and night photographers. sent on July 21, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
