|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Beppeiaf www.juzaphoto.com/p/Beppeiaf  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | DJI Mavic Mini Pros: Price Quality Weight Cons: Low feet - lack of lights - color Opinion: A machine designed to re-enter the new weight limits so you can fly where others stay on the ground. The camera great for all web/social uses, great ginbal is the stabilizer. Apps in Italian and simplified compared to other models. Unfortunately missing the lights and being gray disappears from view already at 40 meters if backlight or with cloudy skies. Low noise as soon as it rises above 10 meters, feet too low, you risk ruining the helipads easily sent on December 01, 2019 |
 | Nikon D3s Pros: File, ergonomics, robustness Cons: Video, Weight Opinion: The machine defined for the sport. When you take it you don't even have to look at it you can start shooting, AF practically perfect with proprietary optics, lightweight files workable and held at high ISO better than many new machines. Robust and reliable to work without problems, practically eternal battery. All the MPX's of modern cars are mirrors for larks, to work seriously in the sport do not serve. Obviously everything is paid on weight and footprint. Who has it if he holds it tight. sent on January 18, 2019 |
 | Lowepro Flipside 300 Pros: Opening system, materials, robustness Cons: Lack of internal supports Opinion: I use it to carry a D3s with mounted the 70-200 including the Duplicator, there is also the mounted the Sigma 300 f/2.8, just remove that kind of inner bag. Let's say it is dedicated for this, at most you can insert a flash or another camera body without lens. Scrambled for sports photos after years is identical to the new sent on August 23, 2018 |
 | Sony Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS Pros: Excellent build quality and optics Cons: Price of the new impractical, elongation Opinion: Taken used at an acceptable price, new is not feasible, to have a standard objective to be mounted on A6000.rnThe jump from 16-50 of the kit is noticeable, do not yell at the miracle but get some pictures worthy of being printed and published. The zoom is mechanical and not electric so it remains fixed even if you turn off the machine (very useful if you have the camera on the stand waiting to shoot), the ferrules are well sized and fluid at the right point.rnThe equipment includes a hood with a graft serious and a cap already less performante.rnFa have on condition to find it at an acceptable price.rnThe fall of quality at the edges is irrelevant in normal use. sent on January 25, 2018 |
 | Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200-500mm f/5.6 E ED VR Pros: Sharpness also at TA, price, VR Cons: Hood (unmistakable), bag, tropicalization Opinion: Taken to replace the 300 Sigma I had to duplicate. It's very slow, both as a construction and as a price, very affordable especially because it does not have to be used professionally, apart from the hood that is a scandal for such a lens and the bag really poor (make it pay 50 euros more and put accessories like it Must) the sharpness even to TA has nothing to envy to much more expensive optics. Good and solid shafts, unfortunately construction means that it extends considerably and therefore can not be tropicalized, which for an optician destined to be used outside can be a problem. The AF, even on dated machines, is acceptable (not at 70/200 levels) due to the magnitude of the optics. The optical excellence for the price as well as the VR although it is advisable to use it with the monopod. sent on July 03, 2017 |
 | Sony A6000 Pros: compact, portable, good the video portion, affordable price Cons: menu absurd, ridiculous battery life, annoying lag in the viewer, missing the shoe cover Opinion: Taken to have a quality machine to take the place of the SLR kit with the standard zoom (comfortable but as quality is not feasible for a press). It has all the advantages and disadvantages of ML beginning with the embarrassing battery life, resolved by taking a compatible complete with a charger (which is not provided in the kit). The vision in the viewfinder is still affected by a delay sometimes annoying as well as the times when it stops between shots, and the 'other. Great the orientation features, compactness and of the whole machine finish. The menu is quite complex and the core functions are mixed with other patently useless, perhaps a little too prosumer. Some bugs type the 'zeroing Zoom and settings upon shutdown could be resolved with a simple firmware upgrade. The files are beautiful full-bodied, jpg churning machine tend cold. rnIl price, especially now that I'm out the new models is very attractive. With good optics is lost compactness but the quality is ottima.rnNella packaging is not including the flash shoe cover cap (3 euro on a popular online store), a fall of style for a home like Sony. sent on February 17, 2017 |
 | Nikon D700 Pros: Robust, reliable, excellent high ISO's Cons: missing video Opinion: taken after the D200, mainly used for sports photo with original optical (70-200, 300) bears very well in the rain and snow without any consequence. Essential to the battery grip especially for the 'use in vertical and' autonomy (even if it is designed so absurd, much better than the D200), the 'Ergonomics is the classic Nikon cones main controls at your fingertips without having to rummage through the various menus and submenus. There are also excellent. Jpg file, not at the level of the Fuji (reference point) but used mainly for publishing needs. The only flaw, a row of dead pixels on the sensor after 200 shots, promptly replaced under warranty quickly. sent on July 30, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
