|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Sabbiavincent www.juzaphoto.com/p/Sabbiavincent  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EOS R5 Pros: Density sensor, CFexpress B memory card, AA filter, light meter, white balance, stabilizer etc, has so many pros Cons: Noise, SD card, AF lock lower than R6 but only in low light, pixel shift only jpeg Opinion: Decisive leap towards the super dense sensor by Canon for its class 5, unfortunately. The car itself is not bad, on the contrary. The sensor is of good quality, the raw decent, only that it is a purely studio camera, with meditated landscapes, thoughtful portraits. We no longer have the ALL-AROUND we were used to with the 5 series. Can it be used in other areas with good results? Definitely, but it's not his field. I would have preferred to have a camera with fewer pixels and more high ISO resistance and the option of a superpixelated version eventually. The AA filter, exposure meter, white balance are good for those who shoot in Jpeg. The pixel shift only in jpeg is absurd, a joke. On the video side, on the other hand, it has many useful things starting from the ALL-I, but also here: RAW shooting only on the CFexpress, when Blackmagic saves in raw on SD. It is the usual Canon that positions the cameras in market segments always giving the impression of having bought a good product but a bit neutered, it is true that no one gives anything away, but this is its only superpixelated mirrorles, an effort could have been made and instead even in its Mk2 it has remained anchored to this philosophy, never mind. My opinion is: it makes sense to buy it only if you practice certain genres listed above. sent on November 27, 2024 |
 | Canon RF 24-105 mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: focal range, low distortion, stabilization Cons: The usual ones who slice a mediocre all-rounder lens: evident flare, nervous blurred, plasticy etc Opinion: Medium quality all-rounder lens in all of course. It is used to bring home work by virtue of its only real quality: the focal range. Unfortunately even canon following today's taste is making hyper-sharp lenses at the expense of something that for example the first EF version had: a lot of aberrations able to give a fascinating stamp to the photo. With this lens you take the same shots you get from a mobile phone; combined with machines like the R6 classic and even worse with the R6mk2 (honest machine that costs more than it is worth for now) the results are disastrous. With the R5, on the other hand, things improve considerably. I do not want those who are affected by dunning kruger and amateur photographers accustomed to mobile phones or to think of a single dimension as a parameter to take a picture: sharpness. Work lens I repeat, suitable for those who have to go light with the minimum characteristics of an L series that I remember is the class of lenses designed for those who work with photography, period. In case anyone thinks that it was too cutting in the judgment I add some information: purchased a few months ago - no more than three - to date combining it with all the FF R series, except the RP, I made about 7 thousand shots (events, portraits, catalogs, weddings) both in the studio and on the wild, in addition to videos: interviews, business, events. sent on September 20, 2023 |
 | Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM II Pros: Sharp, blur, tropicalized, fast AF. Cons: Weighs but is f1.4 Opinion: Great lenses, my second 35mm, taken after years of thinking due to a "disappointment" with sigma art, the model in question had serious AF and FBfocus constancy problems, a sluggish eheh! After many photos and a long time to try slow, I realized that the 35mm is a good focal point for what I have in mind: less exasperated than 24mm and fairly wide angle to give breath. What to say: great on everything, maybe you will not have the magical blur of the 1.2 or the first version, but the quality is all there and you see. Who can take it and will not regret it. sent on October 05, 2017 |
 | Manfrotto XPRO 3W Pros: good quality aluminum, boils at 3 levels Cons: knobs poor Opinion: Beautiful to look at, but does not have the slots for the dowels to stop the engagement, the knobs are hollow plastic and sealed with a cap attached with a glue-like attack, you can detach it under strong pressure: there is a spring inside. rnGlobalmente does not give me custody: in a day of shooting, if the cap was off, it would be a nice problema.rnUna fall style that I did not expect from Manfrotto, for me that is just enough. sent on August 21, 2014 |
 | Canon 5D Mark III Pros: Magnesium body, joysticks, coverage viewfinder, AF module, held at high ISO Cons: meter is not coupled to the selected focus Opinion: Machine balanced, good body, light and sturdy, with respect to the series 1.rnChe add? Missing the meter hooked to the area af I think is a serious flaw for a professional body, perhaps the most serious. rnPer the rest, it is flexible and fast, he could hardly help it, once proven, the sensor is a pleasant surprise, especially if you are coming from aps-c canon 7d that from then on, has stagnated, without adding any real news . sent on July 01, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L USM Pros: Sharpness, autofocus Cons: stabilizer Opinion: In fact, this lens is not nothing wrong, is perfect, except for the stabilizer and the use that I do - ceremonies - you miss. For those who have the need to shoot indoors perfetto.rnSfocato is pleasant, fast focus, it holds well in mano.rninsomma for those who must stay on a budget, it is a must have! RnLo advice to eyes chiusi.rn sent on September 07, 2013 |
 | Tamron SP 180mm f/3.5 Di LD Macro Pros: Cost, image quality, outer ring for rotary filter, good for polarizers Cons: ultrasonic motor does not Opinion: Using this lens with great satisfaction for some years. The definition is great, as its value for money. The f is its main flaw, but it is not so lento.rnSi is used at a good price in good condizioni.rnUsato also improperly everyday use, not disfigured with the lens aperture ring on canon.rnConcordo MAF precise and smooth . rnTornassi back the ricomprerei? rnSì, is a Mr. MACRO sent on December 17, 2012 |
 | Samyang 35mm f/1.4 AS UMC Pros: Grand opening, great focus, mechanically flawless Cons: It is not autofocus - but it's a Cons? Opinion: I've used it with great pleasure for a month and gave me great emotions. For those coming from analogue prehistoric goals that used strictly manual ... is a return to the past! So is gorgeous. Given the cost, you have to accept the compromises he has. The focus is fast and easy using the Live View. Recommended, but only for those who want the objectives fixed. I would say that is a specialty for connoisseurs only sent on May 27, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
