|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Daniel_to_1981 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Daniel_to_1981  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sony FE 50mm f/1.8 Pros: Good brightness and for some portrait is fine. I use it a lot for video Cons: If you don't use it with a decent body in AF you can complain about the slow focus. (I wrote it succeeds.) Opinion: To use on a6000 bodies on. A7rii on. On A9, A7III, a6500 and A7RIII is very fast, equal to the speed of 28-70 or 35mm 1.8. Always check the firmware and in principle is an excellent purchase around 189 maximum 219. Import or not change anything because the failure rate is almost non-existent. In video at 1.8 is very nice in the picture also but eye to put well in the center what interests more. Bodies to avoid A7r A7s A7s2 A7 A7ii sent on June 17, 2018 |
 | Sony A7 III Pros: Bah... costs 2300 Euros and you eat anything. I don't know what else to add. Cons: Unfortunately it only came out now... while the others "who have glasses" still have to figure out how to have super powers in the dark and AF coverage of 93%. Opinion: I sold the A9 and I kept this. Frankly I can not quite understand the speech that some do about the fact "I chose this for my amateur needs". Gentlemen, it is a machine that everything is except for "amateur needs"... the (needs) by definition... everything is except amateur. For amateur needs you buy a 760D. One a6000/6300/6500 used... a RX100... not a A7III. But what I'm sorry enough in such a portal is to see that the technical sheets of the best known brands "that have glasses eh"... have details so meticulously exact even on bodies from 180 euros new, while this, No. sent on June 17, 2018 |
 | Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS Pros: Actually, there are ONLY pro ... minimum focus at 0.96 ... rnTStop 2.9. Instant AF. stabilizer that seems to 200mm mounted on a tripod. shutter without the slightest fear to 1/15. even less. Cons: It has no ... even against the price Opinion: I saw that they have given a weighted average vote of 8.8 ... strange considering that quell'aborto of canon 70-200 2.8 (which I own) is not even comparable to this ... from the minimum focus that is scary (0.96) and that the actual transmission of light is 2.9 .. not as the canon that eventually and almost 4.0 .. but saw them there ... CANON wrote tuuuuutto goes well .. rnrnLente (GOODS) in factories in Japan ... built better than the canon ... EYE-Af ... stabilizing cross with IBIS in leotards and OSS on slow .. 40mpixel of rosoluzione .. no distortion. AC .. non-existent and does not have that crap ghosting effect of the canon and nikon ... and does not suffer from focus breathing .. rnTROPICALIZZATO proof tub ... 2 mode stabilization .. 3 buttons (mirror) and programmable switches for the focusing range. Boleh spectacular .rnrnChi gave votes to the lens ... deserves a value to shoot at life with a machine disposable. sent on April 05, 2017 |
 | Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Pros: honestly no one Cons: It costs too much and sigma 17-70 2.8 C is objectively better. It is as reliable as a grain of the lens and is likely to enter the elements in the barrel. The materials used are the worst ever touched. Opinion: I had it for 2 months and then sold it after testing the Sigma 17-70 2.8 Contemporary DC OS "STABILIZED". light, very bello.rnsinceramente I write only because of the fact that unfortunately there is a character limit in order to submit the review but I would stop sicneramente soooooo primarnnon I recommend buying. for me are now superior optics and much more updated at half the price and with hood incluso.rn sent on March 11, 2017 |
 | Sony FE 90mm f/2.8 Macro G OSS Pros: Currently the best lens for Sony FF. of APSC it becomes an incredible 135mm 2.8 for stunning portraits and sharp as a pair of freshly made glasses. Cons: Only if you have the 70-200 2.8 GMaster this lens "might" not be necessary. But the fact remains that the minimum focusing distance to 25cm is unmatched. Opinion: It is a high quality device with an incredible resolution. Lightweight and built impeccably. Very bright, a great bokeh made with its 9 blunt blades. My test (despite being a person very attached to the numbers) for this lens was simply tile it to a Zeiss batis 1.8 85mm and a 85mm sony 1.4GMaster "both lenses that I own" and comparing them to a 200% crop to 2.8 this FE 90mm 2.8 Macro was much sharper between three and with vignetting and AC virtually assenti.rnrnA my opinion this lens is a GMaster and not a G and its price is absolutely justified ... we had been written or Canon Nikon would have a miracle because of the "unbelievable cheapness" of the lens ... but since it says sony ... things change and it is too cara.rnrné a lens you have to force (unless you do not like me 70 200 2.8 g master) not only for the minimum ability to focus "not matched by 70 200 g master "which is actually 25cm and 28cm but not even for the minimum Focus range selectable by switch on the lens stabilizer on / off and the marvelous soft key which by default is set to" Hold focus. "the focus ring is also the switch to switch to manual focus / auto focus and portraits when used with a7r2 makes eyes water .. not to say altro.rnrnChi says he has difficulty in focusing deserves to use a nokia 3310 as a machine picture and photograph only shows this heavy bianche.rnChi tele lens should have done dance classica.rnrn * the description of this site which reads "Engine AF = NOT ultrasound" (PLAY) almost as an insult and an attitude rather degrading towards this view. in fact, the lens features Sony's proprietary Direct Drive motor SuperSonic technology (DDSSM) "floating" which in my opinion is a few years before the "for me the classic" ultrasonic motorIt is more a marketing joke that the reality of the technical specifications fatti.rnrndalle: rnI two focus groups in focus with floating system are driven by the innovative system DDSSM (Direct Drive Motor at supersonic waves), for smooth and precise positioning of the lenses heavy that make macro magnification full-frame possible. rnrn * The internal stabilization of the lens works in sync with the cars have integrated SteadyShot to 5 axes. sent on March 11, 2017 |
 | Sigma 85mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: It has everything that others have produced to date and is 2 times sharper even at 1.4. In the worst cases, it costs half as other ... in the best coast 1/3 cases. Cons: It weighs ... but to me it's fine. It presents lightweight AC (magazine) when not made perfectly focused to 1.4. for me an advantage because once gone I know that are in focus even checking with focus peaking and magnifier focus. Opinion: Just use it to realize this. One Zeiss Otus best and autofocus. I do not think there is more to say. I think is the best on the market 85mm bokeh is spectacular and crowded as it is said in some reviews. I sincerely believe that I will give away both the canon nikon 85 85 1.2l only more mk2 and I will keep this. The autofocus enables continuous use of the manual without changing setting. I use it on a6500 and a7r2 with sigma MC11 Canon EF mount and the lens is practically native E-mount and calibration via USB Sigma Dock advanced feature allows a great customization for the sensitivity and range of manual focus. sent on March 11, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
