JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 179000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Cons:Zoom ring a bit hard compared to the competition
Opinion:Professional lens. Proven shortly after the Nikon 70-200 FL, and I must say if they play it. Maybe a hair faster than the Nikon, but probably merit the brutal AF of the D500 compared to the A7R3. It has no flaws, it is a professional lens born to meet the needs of a professional. I personally believe that the 70-200 have arrived at the state of the art, and it is difficult to update them in the future. The only drawback of this lens is probably the not very smooth zoom ring, which instead the Nikon FL possesses, and really allows with a finger to rotate and zoom. The image quality is very good, and it detaches the Nikon VR II NET, but absolutely not the latest version FL. I have to contradict the review of another user. Nikon with the latest version FL has done wonders about the quality and artisticity of the 70-200 to 200mm (I invite you to see comparisons 1:1 between VR II and FL online), and this Sony offers nothing more than the Nikon FL. However, they are always two lenses for two different systems, so it is right that both coexist, and are praised for their qualities. Needless to mention the price, on lenses of the kind intended for professionals is superfluous. An iron like that makes you take the bread home, so every penny is justified.
Pros:Build quality, precision and focus speed, really great bokeh, crazy stabilizer, sharpness
Cons:Absolutely nothing
Opinion:I love the fixed optics, but this Sony 70-200 f/2.8 I had to take it as it is a lens to have in the kit. I tried it one day in a store and I absolutely fell in love with it. Pesa, yes, Maa me little matter the footprint and weight. I found in this lens a quality image, responsiveness, speed and precision focusing in AFC which is a thing out of the ordinary. The sharpness also at TA is crazy. Costa, yes, but worth every penny, I assure you!
Pros:Accuracy, speed, image quality, boken, minimum fire distance
Cons:Nobody
Opinion:I say I do not like zooming and work mainly with wide-angle optics but you know: a 70/200 in the optical kit will never end up unused. After being passed from Canon to Sony, first A7 Series then A9, I hired for some photos and video work this GM zoom range. The quality of the overall picture is great, I would say almost as much as the Canon 400 2.8, and I immediately realized that I was dealing with a real-life lens at the top. In the aftermath of working days I brought this lens to all the possible extremes both in terms of fire and light conditions. Difficult if not impossible, at least with A9, blur a picture. Waiting for a bride in front of the church c was an unexpected and I was struck with a truck that did not have to be there. I'm looking for a position to get the bride in the car arriving and suddenly I realize that it was late and I had the last minute to immortalize that moment. There is no time to frame the camera point to the eye subject, without letting the eye on the viewfinder in full sunlight, and then press the buttonclick. Result? Perfect and very beautiful picture. Other sensation I was lucky to take the right time but the likelihood that the photo was slightly blurred was high. When I saw it on the PC monitor I was astonished. I realized that this optic is really superior to any other one on the market with equal features and price. Zoom does not crush the image and if you shoot at 2.8 the boken and gorgeous at any focal point, and remains beautiful and clean even zooming on a distant and small subject as a full-length person occupying a small portion of the shot. The subject is always in focus and the tridimensionality with the background and embarrassing for Canon's analogue and worse for Nikon. The stabilizer allows you to shoot free-hand video if you have a culturist arm, which is impossible with any other focal-like optics. I see there are still few reviews but many votes and the average is 8.6. I would like to know how many of the users Juza have ever had in the hands of a zoom in this price range and with such a high quality overall. To make an econ comparisonif this zoom costs 3,000 euros the Canon should cost a maximum of 1,700. Obviously it is my opinion. rn
Pros:Sharpness - Precision - Zoom - Bokeh - and much more, and I love to die for it
Cons:Nothing (not even the price)
Opinion:I've taken it from just a few days, and it's simply the best mirror tones for sony. Accurate, stabilized, solid, and wonderfully sharp. The bokeh is of unique authenticity (like all sony G Master optics). If you want, you can fit a converter, made for this optic (there are 2: one is 1.4x and the other 2x), so you save a possible 100-400mm of the G Master. The "no" cost is prohibitive when compared to when it was launched but who has a Sony A7RII, after the wonderful 24-70mm of the G Master, this is to be done absolutely, not because of its versatility but also for the Its precious composition worthy of 70-200mm.
Pros:Actually, there are ONLY pro ... minimum focus at 0.96 ... rnTStop 2.9. Instant AF. stabilizer that seems to 200mm mounted on a tripod. shutter without the slightest fear to 1/15. even less.
Cons:It has no ... even against the price
Opinion:I saw that they have given a weighted average vote of 8.8 ... strange considering that quell'aborto of canon 70-200 2.8 (which I own) is not even comparable to this ... from the minimum focus that is scary (0.96) and that the actual transmission of light is 2.9 .. not as the canon that eventually and almost 4.0 .. but saw them there ... CANON wrote tuuuuutto goes well .. rnrnLente (GOODS) in factories in Japan ... built better than the canon ... EYE-Af ... stabilizing cross with IBIS in leotards and OSS on slow .. 40mpixel of rosoluzione .. no distortion. AC .. non-existent and does not have that crap ghosting effect of the canon and nikon ... and does not suffer from focus breathing .. rnTROPICALIZZATO proof tub ... 2 mode stabilization .. 3 buttons (mirror) and programmable switches for the focusing range. Boleh spectacular .rnrnChi gave votes to the lens ... deserves a value to shoot at life with a machine disposable.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
