|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Andreab www.juzaphoto.com/p/Andreab  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM Pros: Bright, light, sharp, fast and accurate AF, price, strength, blurred creamy Cons: Lens hood not included, Purple fringing (but nothing tragic) Opinion: This lens for what it costs and that there is a affarone.rnScommetto mettessero a red line and double their price to sell it to vagoni.rnNitida TA becomes razor sharp closing of a stop.rnTA suffers slightly by Purple fringing but in a still very modest. RNAF fast and preciso.rnE 'fantastic for portraits but obviously gets along very well in every context in which they serve is really blurred mm.rnLo 85 bellorn sent on July 29, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Stra-Sharp, lightning-fast and accurate AF, Stabilizer very effective indeed, beautiful colors, lightweight, compact Cons: No one Opinion: This lens is wonderful and worth every € 1000 costa.rnE that 'a monster of sharpness starting from 70 to 200, the AF is fast and very preciso.rnInoltre being light and compact is also excellent as a lens walk around, the goes for a walk without difficulty and with many soddisfazioni.rnLo stabilizer is really very complex efficace.rnNel is really one of the best lenses I've ever had the pleasure of possederernrn sent on July 29, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Pros: price - size / weight - sharpness if just a little closed - brightness Cons: construction - AF - a little blurry .... pentagonal! - Manual focus diffcilissimo Opinion: Inevitable in any kit lens low budget (and not only). For € 100 you bring home a toy that will unmount if you do not hand in the first breath (very rough construction) will give you great satisfaction. Reaches 1.8 with decent results, and if a little closed to may pay a more expensive lenses and emblazoned in terms of color and sharpness. The noisy and slow AF (money's worth) The focus is not nice but not so unwatchable .... well also blurred the money's worth! sent on May 28, 2012 |
 | Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 DC HSM Pros: 8 mm - nitdezza - color-AF - solid construction Cons: important dimensions - filters can not be used Opinion: Spectacular this lens, 8mm wide .... I'm really one of the lenses funniest ever. Impresses the sharpness is at the center than at the edges, good AF and also the build quality. It is not a very bright lens but so far I have never felt the lack of more openness, not consider it a problem on a wide angle. Even not being able to use filters to me is not a problem. sent on May 28, 2012 |
 | Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Pros: Sharpness, price, color, weight / size, USM AF Cons: hood not included Opinion: Really sharp already from 2.8, very very sharp. Value for money really excellent and good availability in used, the AF (if we think it is a macro lens that we are talking about) is very good. The construction though not by L-series is still very good also. Consigliatissima. When used for portraits is sometimes a little merciless ..... sent on May 28, 2012 |
 | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Sharpness - Versatility - Building L - well established - great colors Cons: Flare Flare Flare, AF in low light (sporadically) Opinion: Excellent all-round lens. I use it on APS-C and is perfect for my needs. with 105mm f / 4 on APS-c The stabilizer is essential and that of the 24-105 works very well indeed. Good construction from L series, very sharp for a zoom cos' wide (except for F / 4 which is clear enough and without a lot), beautiful colors. The only real drawback is that it suffers a lot of flare and you have to be there atttenti sent on May 05, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
