|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Vincio85 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Vincio85  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm XF 23mm f/1.4 R Pros: construction, compactness Cons: hood, manual focus ring, slow and noisy af, no wr, low sharpness on 40mx, slow diaphragm ring Opinion: Purchased and resold. The lens is well built, has an excellent three-dimensionality, turns out to be compact, the focus although slow and noisy for static or not very dynamic shots turns out to be reliable, while in continuous focus it is too slow. The focus ring with manual af unlock I found it really uncomfortable, I much prefer the free ring as on the 35mm 1.4 R, this would have allowed you to focus automatically but at the same time activate A + M, necessary to correct where the camera was wrong fire. Another thing that I did not like, the diaphragm ring too soft, it was enough to touch it to move it as well as there is no block on A. The optics are not tropicalized and during demanding trips it could bring dust to the sensor. Original horrendous hood and replaced with the JJC all-aluminum. For portraits set the optics is beautiful, but if you shoot at medium and long distances unfortunately loses RESOLUTION on camera bodies with 40mpx, in substance increases the diffraction and you find yourself having unclear photos even at closed apertures, this problem is noticed more on microdetail for example as mountain landscapes, agglomeration of houses etc., in order to solve it is necessary to increase the sharpness in post production and then during export reduce the entire image to 24/26mpx. In short, it is a dated product, now out of production and personally I would not recommend it to those who have an XT5 or XH2. sent on September 23, 2023 |
 | Fujifilm X-T5 Pros: Ergonomics, Viewfinder, Robustness, Battery Life, Tropicalization, Dual SD Slots, LCD Tilt, Stabilizer, Shadow Dynamic Range, Fuji Color Rendering, Combined Shutter, General Construction and also of its Optics Cons: Sensor NOT Stacked, Ease micormosso cause 40mpx, Rolling Shutter in ES, no exposure meter for highlights, ring Still Movie too soft, Autofocus good but not like the competition, Dynamic range highlights poor, too many settings and viewfinder that if not cleaned generates confusion, start noise iso to 3200 Opinion: Taken to replace the Xpro series, what to say is objectively beautiful but not all that glitters is gold. The machine is a real flagship, with a myriad of functions and customization possibilities, to such an extent that it took some time before stitching it entirely to measure, having to clean the evf viewfinder from the superfluous and finding the right setting of the keys, and also find the right setting to manage the 40mpx, and yes, they are objectively too many for an APS-C. Unlike the Xpro series, it has many more keys especially on the back, and over the years among the various models released Fuji, unlike the competition, continues to move everything, but in this XT5 I think they have found the right compromise, in fact I find comfortable the AF-ON and AEL button that you click with only the right thumb. The ergonomics is objectively designed for heavier optics, and in reality this is good given the output of the new fixed ones that have been enlarged. The overall rendering of the file is really very nice with unique colors. The battery lasts a lot from 600 to 700 shots per cycle which is really good for an ML. The ergonomics can then be further improved by adding the grip, in my case I chose that of the JJC which is much cheaper than the original and is much better, allowing me to hook the shoulder strap diagonally, this has further improved ergonomics, as the machine thus positions itself in a "slingshot", balancing the weights downwards. Moving on to the negative things, the machine is not without defects, has a 40mpx sensor that as already said in my opinion are too many for an aps-c, this generates greater sharpness yes, but leads to a series of disadvantages, such as greater noise at high iso and here I limit myself to reach a maximum of 3200, greater shake and the stabilizer must be set properly to limit the problem, in addition to the fact that with more recent optics there is a greater resolution than older optics. In addition, the sensor is not stacked, this leads to a number of additional disadvantages, such as slightly slower AF, higher iso noise, rolling shutter with the electronic shutter. Beyond this, the machine has an excellent dynamic range with regard to shadows where 3 stops are easily recovered, but as regards the highlights maximum 1 stop and not even in the presence of strong contrasts, and for this reason it would have been convenient to have the weighted light meter for highlights, which is missing. The viewfinder is well resolved and the refresh rate is excellent, but in some cases it is too contrasted. The film simulations in the camera I think are totally useless, as the result is not always guaranteed to every scene and therefore I prefer to apply them eventually in post production, where in that case I can see a preview of the final result. Q key convenient exclusively for all those functions that are used in rare cases and easy to access, as well as the MY menu. Another thing I would like to have, but this not only on fuji but on every brand, and a flat or linear profile and the closing curtain for optical change. Who is this machine for, those looking for a solid, professional, high-performance machine body. sent on August 26, 2023 |
 | Fujifilm XF 35mm f/1.4 R Pros: dimensions, weight, barrel and metal hood, three-dimensionality, 1 aspherical element in pure glass Cons: rings too fluid compared to WR models, absence of tropicalization, slow and not always precise AF, noisy Opinion: My first lens of the Fujifilm system chosen in modern times where we now have both the 35 WR f2 and the 33 f1.4 WR, but this in my opinion is a legendary optics, it is no coincidence that even today Fuji does not remove it from the catalog. The optics from an aesthetic point of view is perfect, small, well balanced, built with materials of the highest order, including lenses. Many may not know it and underestimate the issue, but this optics mounts 1 real aspherical element in pure glass, here some will say and what are the lenses made of? Well, there are mineral glasses (pure glass) and organic glasses (synthetic), minerals represent the highest quality. Given these premises, the optics have been chosen wisely, keeping in mind all its limits objects of construction that this first series has, including a slow and noisy AF, but on recent bodies, however, the AF is acceptable, not at the levels of the WR. On the noise honestly I have no problems indeed sometimes I appreciate it because I feel that it is working. The image quality is amazing, the fact of being a 35mm and not a 33 means that the pdc is smaller and more similar to an equivalent of a 50mm FF. With open apertures the lens is soft but at the right point without degrading too much, also the micro contrast is slightly under tone perfect for obtaining portrait photos with a unique look. The aperture ring here is this is too soft compared to the WR version. I hope fuji proposes an updated version keeping the same lenses, size and weight, but with slightly improved AF engine and tropicalization. sent on December 25, 2022 |
 | Fujifilm XF 23mm f/2 R WR Pros: dimensions, weight, metal barrel, fast af, quiet, tropicalized, ring nuts Cons: Drop sharpness below 0.5m, soft with open diaphragms, barrel shape, original horrendous and uncomfortable hood. Opinion: The lens has a microcontrast and color saturation more accentuated than the previous 23 1.4 old, for this reason sometimes the photos can appear too hard and with less personality. But in my opinion perfect for the Xpro system, where it is chosen precisely because of its characteristics, it also does not clash with the OVF viewfinder. As for the aesthetics of the really horrible optics the conical shape, as well as its silly hood (replaced with squarehood), the aperture rings have a perfect shot compared to previous versions. The focus is lightning fast and super quiet, so quiet that you have to stay focused on the focus indicator to understand if it has hooked the subject. The optics are very soft at TA and on subjects below half a meter. It resists flare well and is very correct in general management, but this last point we know is also thanks to the software in the car. Those who choose it know what they want, it is a lens for far street, clearly superior in quality compared to an X100V. sent on December 25, 2022 |
 | Fujifilm X-PRO3 Pros: Construction, Jaws, Rangefinder hybrid viewfinder, Saving settings to external file, Total customization, Hidden LCD with small data screen Cons: Xtrans, Aps-c, Maximum ISO limit, Grid and level in OVF, absence WB Auto Ambiente, ISO ring a bit useless, No photometry for highlights Opinion: Contrary to what you read, especially by those who have not been able to appreciate this body, I find it a really fantastic machine, but I understand that it is not suitable for everyone. The choice fell on this precise model for a number of factors, such as the hybrid rangefinder viewfinder that I find nothing short of brilliant, allows me to range between an OVF without distractions (after customization) suitable for situations where you want to have full control in advance of what will enter the frame or in situations of strong contrast, or the ability to switch to a resolute EVF Oled viewfinder to get an exact view of what the final result will look like. Another very appreciated feature were all the rings at hand, which leave a feedback of use similar to the old analog ones, in addition to the revised and eliminated keys all placed on the right side for quick management. I find brilliant the choice of a hidden LCD, because it has been deliberately made uncomfortable precisely with the intention of consulting it as little as possible, thus avoiding between one click and another to generate insecurity in the user. At the same time its opening downwards I find it useful in shooting conditions in sketch style or hip shoot. As for the menu, really long management and some things are not easy to understand because translated incorrectly, but once you have found the key combination that best suits your photographic style, Fuji has seen fit to allow the saving of all the settings in a single file downloadable on your PC and rechargeable if necessary. As for the Fuji X philosophy, or to shoot in jpg with film simulations, I could see that there is no real constancy in the most varied situations, in addition to the fact that all the devilries taken in place as DR200/400 etc. are exclusively applicable to jpg and not to the RAW file. So in principle to date I have always used the Raw, the jpg ready only in very few cases and in any case they are never so resolute as a raw post produced. The entire body and lens ecosystem today is mature, and you can enjoy a wide range of dedicated lenses, but this model is more congenial with fixed optics. Moreover, being an aps-c weights and dimensions are very contained and proportionate compared to the ML FF. But beyond the beautiful things we move on to the things I did not like. I found, in addition to being widely known, the objective limit that has the XTrans sensor, where to get the maximum yield you have to use C1. The dynamic range of the sensor compared to other APS-c bayers is decent, 3/4 stops are recovered on underexposed photos, but with slight grain visible on shadows, while only 1 stop of recovery on overexposed photos. I find the ISO ring useless and generally varied between A and C, and then adjust in C everything from the rear ring. While the question of the ISO spring is irrelevant, also because on the new models where it is not spring, however, there would be no clicks at each ISO. The white balance in the car is a bit cold and I had to apply a slight toning, it would have been useful to have the WB AUTO AMBIENTE as on XT4. The small rear display I would have made backlit if necessary for dark environments. In the OVF viewfinder with the "light frame position" setting active, grid and level do not follow the frame. Honestly I hope for a future version of the Xpro series exactly like this, but with a slimmer and lighter body and a stacked sensor. sent on November 19, 2022 |
 | Leica Q (Typ 116) Pros: lens, dexterity, manual focus, dng file, solid and excellent materials, metric scale on the barrel, saving settings to the PC, Cons: non-tropicalized, lack double slot, EVF magnification, power key, video key, joystick, no metric scale in EVF, no user profile names, cost. Opinion: I have owned it for several years now, amazing lens, camera body with badly thought design choices! For a simple use, point and click, the machine has been designed in a sensible way, in fact it presents everything you need for street photography, travel, reportage or the time ring, the diaphragm ring, the manual focus ring. Yet despite this simplicity of use, which Leica is famous for as making it a lifestyle, there are a few things that make it cumbersome. So I report the things that I did not like: 1) The joystick in addition to being tiny and flat, if designed for photography alone is inconvenient, as it allows you to move the focus point with the various arrows, but if you want to reposition in the center it does not work, in its place if you click in the center of the joystick the video starts. So to bring the AF back to the center you have to double tap on the LCD. 2) EVF really resolute, now I do not want anything under 3mpx, but despite this, the refresh is slow especially in low light conditions or with slow times, because the machine reproduces the preview when you click halfway through the shutter (this thing can not be deactivated). In addition, the magnification of the EVF in my opinion is not the best, throwing in the eye you have the feeling of being inside a box, you can see the inner walls of the viewfinder. 3) power button, really ugly and uncomfortable, having the two modes Af-S and C makes the ignition annoying, in fact on the leica Q2 it has been eliminated, but even here they did not put the classic screw button of the leica M that could be useful for the mechanical remote shooting or for a soft release button 4) REC button on the upper shell, really useless for those who do not make videos, also absurd that you can not program at will, on the leica Q2 has been solved by adding the pressure on the compensation ring and then set at will the chosen option as the WB. 5) user profiles, these are really convenient and I use them as I created the four presets for the various shooting scenarios, but I find it absurd that if I click on the rear FN button it does not show me the name I assigned to the profiles themselves, so you have to go to memory. 6) absence of tropicalization, with what it cost at the time, absurd that they did not immediately think of making it suitable to withstand the weather, especially being fixed optics, in this case to solve the problem I used electrician tape in critical points (between body and lens where there is the macro switch, so I do not macro, so I do not macro, tape on the case back and microphone holes) and to date despite having been everywhere the sensor is clean. 7) flicker and banding in the presence of artificial lights and in certain shooting conditions, it occurs both in preview and in rare cases also in photos. 8) poor general grip in addition to the fact that on the back back there is no skin, so first I solved with the thumbs up, then removed and replaced with the front grip. 9) buffer not really fast especially if you make multiple shots, it also happened to me in an episode to have 2 corrupt raw files, changed the SD. 10) White balance, the machine in "WB-automatic" shows colors always faithful to reality, on this leica is a guarantee, what I did not like is the absence of the WB Shift or the ability to customize the individual color channels to give a different look if necessary. Having made this realistic review in my opinion the cost of the machine mainly justifies the lens, the quality of the materials and the simplicity of the whole system as well as the choice of raw DNG files that I share (same thing does Ricoh and Sigma) I find them much more comfortable and versatile than any other brand. Moreover, if you can live with the limits described above I would say that it is to be preferred over the Leica Q2. sent on February 22, 2022 |
 | Ricoh GR III Pros: Super compact, invisible, lightweight, snap focus all over APS-C sensor Cons: Battery life, no built-in flash Opinion: After having for years the 2 I switched to 3, on the philosophy of the GR and general features I already said a lot in the previous review on 2, so I tell you something new. Focus improved a lot, finally a hybrid between contrast and phase detection, despite the big improvement that is still convenient in certain critical situations, for my habit use on all bodies machine the center focus point and I'm adopting the technique of the "Back button focus" that on this machine works really well. Really brilliant instead the new exposure condition with priority highlights, works impeccably and conveniently if you want creative photos. The overall color rendering of this new 24mpx sensor is great, but I'm sorry to admit it nothing like the GR2 that guaranteed a certain retro and vintage style charm, now you have to take the necessary post-production tricks to get similar results to the previous one. Instead as for black white is a spanna on top of every previous machine. Regarding the sensor plus pixels compared to the previous one, I say that you have to be careful in certain conditions of critical brightness, because with the 2 and its 16mpx even if a photo was micromox strangely remained acceptable and had a certain retro charm, now the 24mpx do not forgive (here there is little to do is still an APS-C with increased pixel crowding). From my tests the lens is a real blade and the maximum resolution is at diaphragm 5.6, usable up to f11 after the dif-breaker begins. Iso cleaned up to 3200 while at 6400 in my opinion is the maximum limit as it increases the grain and starts the color loss, in black you can go even further. Stabilizer in my opinion useless on a 28mm, although in certain conditions of low brightness of the scene can help, in fact it is activated on the car and comes into operation with slow shooting times. Cleaned up of the superfluous, at the top presents the dial with only the basic mode that each machine should have P/A/S/M and the 3 U programs, on these three programs once customized for their own way and conditions of photographing with this object becomes simply perfect and no longer enters the menu. My carefully searched specimen and well-specific freshman, turns out to be free of any youth defects, no problems with the joypad, no intense overheating in the middle of August after an entire shooting session with a battery cycle. About the ring that you easily unhook, I confirm it, although on my specimen is not as accentuated as the first exits, anyway to definitively solve the problem just use a tiny piece of black duct tape in the part below and then screw it over the ring, I assure you that it will not detach and you will not even see the small piece of tape. For those who complain about the absence of an EVF sight, they have not understood anything about this machine and its philosophy. sent on August 30, 2020 |
 | Ricoh GR II Pros: Super compact, feather weight, portability, high iso held up to 3200 colors and bw 6400, APS-C sensor bayer, no AA filter, fixed focus, razor sharp lens on the whole fotrogramma also TA, quality display, camera body magnesium, wifi, retractable flash, flash sync speed 1/2000 sec, shutter on the lens, RAW in DNG format (such as Leica), speed ignition turned off by impressive, write buffer illimitao, minimum shutter speed up to 300 sec (great for night photos), shot noise nonexistent, bright colors. Cons: a low contrast AF in critical condition (problem since you can cheat with Snap / hyperfocal mode), battery life improved Opinion: I finally left my Leica M9 for this compact. You'll think I'm crazy, but I think it is an undervalued GRII Ricoh machine. To start the car embrace a philosophy similar to leica about the aesthetics of its bodies, not by chance today, it reflects the same digital camera body of its film predecessors (see Ricoh G1), this means that aesthetics not having undergone major changes over time, it means that funziona.rnIn Secondly GRII the choosing for his philosophy, is a simple machine, conceived and designed by those who actually use it, a responsive machine, sileziosa and invisible to the eye of others. Its lens (28mm equivalent FF) is compared to a 28mm Leica, because of its clarity, this is also thanks to his generous sensor APS-C matrix bayer without AA filter, it is sharp throughout the frame already at f2.8 . The machine also processes raw files in Adobe's DNG (the same format used on the universal format really rich color camera Leica) bodies and dettagli.rnInoltre despiteThe plan to its 16mpx and dating back to 2015 in my opinion is by far larger than the new Fuji X70, which compared the final yield, the fuji is really high iso pessima.rnAgli the GRII beats by far my Leica M9, ??where died at 800 iSO, while the GRII allows me to peacefully take in 3200 and 6400 in white color nero.rnL'autofocus albeit slow in critical light conditions, the machine allows you to quickly switchare to snap mode (iperfocale dedicated and studied ad hoc with distance scale depending on the aperture used, all conveniently visible on the display) .rnPersonalmente I think the GRII a perfect machine for landscape photos, street and reportage.rnInizialmente will seem like a machine devoid of meaning, and if not understood his philosophy it is hard to take pictures. Intesamente later after using it for at least a week after the purchase, bringing it around every day, you will find that due: to the lens, hyperfocal, snap mode, sileziosità, competezza, general versatility .. The machine è a deadly weapon that will allow you to shoot without being noticed ravvicinate.rnrnQui distances to find the quality tests compared with other brands: rnrnhttps: //www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen? attr18 = daylight & attr13_0 = ricoh_grii & attr13_1 = fujifilm_x70 & attr13_2 = leica_m_monochrom_typ246 & attr13_3 = fujifilm_x100t & attr15_0 = B & attr15_1 = B & attr15_2 = B & attr15_3 = B & attr16_0 = 400 & attr16_1 = 400 & attr16_2 = 400 & attr16_3 = 400 & normalization = full & widget = 1 & x = 0 & y = 0 sent on February 24, 2017 |
 | Leica M10 Pros: size, Viewfinder Optical x0.73, improved responsiveness 2Gb buffer, iso ring on the cap, simplified menu, three options of exposure meter, silent, minimalist and tropical conditions, iso impressed usable up to 12,500 color (black and white is another matter , and you can give vent to your creativity) Cons: battery life, lower plate, lack pose T (only on M9) Opinion: After six years of honorable service of my old Leica M9, ??and after trying and angry the next, I can finally say that the M10 is a worthy replacement for the M9.rnAvuta only in practice, the machine in hand raises an incredible emotion, in primarily because of its new design and its size, which even improved a few millimeters, handheld give the feeling of having an old analog Leica M. The weight instead although it is heavier than the M9 (currently the lightest digital M), curiously is well balanced, but not from that heavy feeling that gave the M240. The M10 is a collection of all the features of previous versions: Frames only white led (like the M262), LiveView (like the M240), no video (like M9 and M262 to maintain the minimalist spirit), buffer 2GB ( as the MP 240) ecc.rnTralasciando all technical data, i can say that after my trial i was particularly surprised by the yield of iso and the dynamic range of the color sensore.rnScattando i managed to push myself quietllamente, and without loss of detail, up to 12,500 ISO, maintaining a grain really nice and monocromatica.rnLe things that I did not like were: the absence of the pose T (present instead on my old M9, convenient to use filters lee, especially the big stopper), then the lower plate to be disassembled each time to access the battery compartment and sdcard; I personally believe that the removable bottom plate of a digital camera does not make sense to exist, and I think most intelligent and practical classic bottom flap. Another thing I did not like, the autonomy, which compared the M240 has taken a step back. sent on February 21, 2017 |
 | Leica M (Typ 240) Pros: LiveView, optical viewfinder, LCD resolute, improved battery, LED frames, light meter to three options (spot, weighted, matrix) Cons: Weight, Size, EVF viewfinder of poor quality, lack pose T (present on M9) Opinion: It had for three months to replace my old Leica M9. At first glance the machine fills all the gaps of his predecessor, and you immediately notice a general responsiveness in both reading and writing, the ability to use the latest generation SD card, an LCD resolute and conveniently with the LiveView lens "accessory "as the 21mm and 90mm, where thanks to liveview you can do without external viewfinders to be put on the sled, so you have full control of the frame and fire thus avoiding parallax errors (optical wide) and errors fire (short telephoto lenses) .rnRispetto my M9 I found it too heavy and large, and all those megapixels combined with an optical rangefinder viewfinder 0.68x, have meant that we often had to fire or shake-problems. Also I could see that the .iso is not improved much, you gain 1 stop for color photos and 2 stops in white black, always in comparison with the old CCD M9 where one would stop to 800 iso.rnPersonalmente the M240 with its CMOS 24mpx it was not aroused strong emotions that I abandon all my old M9, where instead that because of its CCD sensor 18mpx is still a special car today. I think that the M240 was an attempt to counter leica a cutthroat market, creating something that would allow different uses (see possibility of useless video on M system). Not by chance after the M240, Leica has "baked" the M262 to maintain a minimalist and pure philosophy. sent on February 21, 2017 |
 | Leica M9 / M9-P Pros: size, minimalist, FF sensor, CCD, a few buttons, menus on a page, silent, optical viewfinder. Cons: LCD slow and resolute little, write buffer and limited reading, Iso limited. Opinion: It 'a very special car, still capable (given his age) to give you unique emotions and sensations because of its CCD sensor without filter AA.rnDimenticate the automatism of the Japanese, this is a machine that can make you think about how to compose and focus correttamente.rnCapisco sure unit is not for everyone, but this car after a while that you use from addictions, and color rendering is unica.rnrnHo had in years of M multiple optical system, but I think the Leica M being simple in its system, simplification requires the use of lenses. So I recommend a few slow but good. The M9 with 35mm Cron is the perfect combination of simplicity, quality, minimalism. sent on February 19, 2017 |
 | Leica Summilux-M 50mm f/1.4 ASPH Pros: Crisp, robust, integrated lens hood, floating element, lightweight Cons: Nobody Opinion: A knife, this is the correct term for descriverlo.rnOgni 50mm Leica is different from the other, and each model has its strengths and weaknesses. This last model was created to correct the focus shift of problems (focus shift) that they were suffering the models with minimum distance 0.7m, adding the floating element. In addition to solve the contrast increase and improve the overall yield it was added the aspherical element. What can I say, it's a really perfect optics, capable of solving the demanding requirements of digital. I think it's the best compromise between a pre-asph 50 lux and 50 Cron. In fact, this new model, being crystal clear, it is suitable also in architecture, and at the same time makes it very good for photos in TArnrnHo had his predecessor Lux 50 Pre-Asph type III, later replaced by the Lux 50 equiv (sold today) .rnPersonalmente for a specific use, for photos from environmental portrait half-length and full-length, I prefer and recommend the Pre-asph model with a distance of 1m, where it is more blurred ù pleasing (the pre-asph model 1m is not suffering from focus shift) .rnTrovo Lux 50 ASPH too sharp and the blurred too crudo.rnrnSu Sony A7x 50 Lux Asph is fine when used for short and medium distance with fixed adapter if used with TechartPro the yield decreases due to the element of infinity flottante.rnAd Sony TA goes lily with change Kolari Vison is perfect as Leica. sent on February 19, 2017 |
 | Leica Summilux-M 35mm f/1.4 ASPH Pros: Three-dimensional, zero distortion, zero aberrations, sharpness throughout the frame, colors, rugged Cons: weight, size Opinion: Optically speaking is perfect, from the first class. Capable of giving a unique feel to your photos when used in TA.rnRispetto the Pre-FLE version, this latest version has superior performance, and in architecture does not flatten the tridimensionalità.rnLa vignetting present at f1.4 and f2 is really pleasing as it is able to isolate the subject. Leica M-coded 6bit vignetting is contained during shooting because of the software developed to hoc.rnrnIl 35 FLE is a newly developed optical, for floating element created to compensate for the limitations of the rangefinder on a digital too esigente.rnrnL 'optic when used on Sony A7x goes lily at the edges, and the floating element can be a problem because when used with adapters type the Techart Pro will preclude its qualità.rnSu Sony A7x with change Kolari Vision optics to the edges makes perfectly as Leica M digitale.rnrnPersonalmente I had for 6 years Summilux 35 Pre-Asph Canada, an optical full of optical defects, but able to give a unique emotion that sol optical leica era damage. Later I replaced my old pre-Lux asph with 35 FLE, but the weight, bulk and too much perfection made me love full of this, today venduta.rnrnPersonalmente through stop aperture advice to aim for 35 cron, maybe the latest version to 11 blades, where the yield, weights and dimensions are perfect in the telemetry system. sent on February 19, 2017 |
 | Leica Super-Elmar-M 21mm f/3.4 ASPH Pros: small, lightweight, no distortion or aberration, high-quality, stylish metal lens hood, contrast, zero vignetting Cons: nobody Opinion: Optics really wonderful on every front! RnAvendo also had a 21 Elmarit asph 2.8, this new lens is the best ever produced by 21mm Leica.rnPiccolo, lightweight, very high quality at every aperture and throughout the frame, also does not suffer from any problem physical ottico.rnEssendo perspective of recent construction has been designed and developed specifically for the requirements of the Leica digital digitale.rnrnSu yield M is perfect for every diaframma.rnrnSu Sony A7x instead the edges do not do well even at f8, with change Kolari Vision optics in question is usable up to f5.6, f4.0 while migliora.rnrnPS If you are going to photograph the stars then this light is not shown since its minimum aperture to F3.4 sent on February 19, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
