|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Corteprima Studio www.juzaphoto.com/p/CorteprimaStudio  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 135mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art Pros: Bright, fast and accurate AF, extraordinary, impeccable, incredible blur, absolute sharpness, colors. Cons: nobody Opinion: Built a few days on my Canon 7D mark II, I can guarantee you extraordinary results. The portrait lens of absolute reference, fast and precise, is so much fun that it does not go away from the body optics. Blurry and gorgeous, beautiful colors. It costs a little more than the canon, but I assure you it's worth it. straconsgliato! sent on July 24, 2017 |
 | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: outstanding stabilizer, sharpness, autofocus, price. Cons: With the lens hood in the rest position, you can not 'use the goal. Opinion: Great paintings, with value for money fairytale. It 'a goal that is unsurpassed sharpness and precision, then the stabilizer does not miss a beat and freezes l' image. Using this' optical on canon 7d mark II and the operation and 'as to stand up to much more' expensive goals like canon and nikon. Its sharpness and focus are of prim 'order; 70 to 300 is flawless. L 'autofocus but not lightning fast enough to allow use in sports optics, brightness' F4-5.6, not del2,8 level but I guarantee that it is not' bad. Recommended to the full !!! sent on December 03, 2016 |
 | Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: Value for 'extraordinary price, sharpness, construction. Cons: hood improvable Opinion: Using this' optical two years, mounted on the first D 70 and subsequently on 7 D Mark II. I have always enjoyed it and gives clear images already at 2.8, before improving to F 4 and up. Tropical conditions stabilized, truly exceptional; I also have the Canon 24-105 F4 L and you notice no difference in the sharpness. In 2.8 you can 'take pictures with ambient light or the evening street with light publica no hand problems free and They come out of brilliant images. Someone complains about back-front focus issues, but I have never encountered anything like this, so I highly recommend it. sent on November 24, 2016 |
 | Sigma 50-500mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM Pros: Versatile, quick to focus, precise, sharp. Cons: Weight. Opinion: Using this' optical by about two years, he gave me more satisfaction, first on D 70 until the month of May, then on 7 D Mark II. I know and 'a little heavy, but I assure you, and' a 'viewpoint that pays any sacrifice, always fast in focus, engages the subject in the best way, robust optic that is used primarily to' external, for landscaping or to portray subjects more 'neighbors or more' distant. Extraordinary price performance ratio, I recommend it to those sports photographer and bird life. the brightness 'is not his forte, but I assure you that you will not feel the lack of brightness' F4 or 2.8. Satisfied dell 'purchase !!! sent on November 21, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Value for '/ price, fast, handy autofocus, crisp. Cons: Nobody Opinion: Using this' optical few months and I must say that gives me very sharp shots. It 's my first objective L series, mounted on the 7D Mark II are truly satisfied, you can create portraits, landscapes, macro, etc. practically a real all-rounder quality ', for more' stable, quiet, fast. Someone complains for vignetting at 24 mm, but I this is not the 'I noticed, probably' cause I have a 'APSC. Color, brightness ', three dimensional', are the optimum level, even if not 'a 2.8, the blurred and' pleasing. Higly recommended !!! sent on November 19, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
