|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Ildaino www.juzaphoto.com/p/Ildaino  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Pros: Optical quality, weight, stabilization, L-series construction, value for money Cons: f/4 aperture (but you already know), length/overall dimensions Opinion: First "serious" wide-angle, used with profit on the 6D II, R and R6 II. Sold to make room for the RF 15-35 f/2.8 for the best maximum aperture and now "advanced" age of the lens ever. Excellent image quality and weight, good from corner to corner. Used on mirrorless a bit bulky due to the need to use the adapter ring (necessary). In the end as long as the RF 15-35, a little lighter of course. Filter diameter 77 mm (same as RF 70-200 f/4). Sadly sold to monetize. Super recommended for excellent value for money. sent on July 16, 2025 |
 | Canon EOS R Pros: Price, file quality, "Canon" colors, size and weight, rear display, top display Cons: Touch-bar, no wheel and joystick, no dual SD slot, viewfinder (see below) Opinion: Overall satisfied with the EOS R. My first mirrorless, I came from 6D mkII mainly photographing landscapes. On the "pros" I don't add anything else, while on the "cons" I insist on lame ergonomics, also considering what the competition offers. The absence of joystick and wheel is felt, not at all compensated by the touch-bar (which in fact has not been re-presented in other models). Viewfinder a bit difficult to use in certain situations due to light infiltration from the side, this makes the user experience sometimes frustrating, while the LCD screen behaves well. Note of merit for the presence of the upper display which actually comes in handy on various occasions (check settings, bulb timer etc). In the end I decided and I traded in with R6 mkII taking advantage of a super advantageous offer trying to exploit the value of the R again, not so much for AF improvements (which are extraordinary I would say) but for ergonomics. In summary, I am very satisfied with the R and I recommend it for landscape and portraiture (AF ok even eye-focus quite performing). For the video section I do not express myself as I have not used it particularly. sent on November 14, 2024 |
 | Canon 6D Mark II Pros: Screen, battery life, ergonomics, solid in construction, not too heavy Cons: Dynamic range, not very "responsive" in viewing photos and navigating menus Opinion: I purchased the used 6d2 to enter the FF world. A nice jump starting from 50D. The impression was immediately very good, in particular I appreciated the posable screen and the construction. The keys are in place, so also satisfied with the ergonomics. I am not positively impressed with the dynamic range, referring to the files of the 5d4 we are on another level, in particular unsatisfactory shadows. Chapter AF, the points are "few" in absolute numbers, especially in this period when mirrorless are making room (with pros and cons, e.g. EVF). Therefore, as more than one user has written, it is not suitable for very dynamic situations, for landscape and portraiture I would say ok. I haven't thoroughly tested the video side, so I'm not going to go into that. In general a good "last" reflex churned out by Canon, I think is enough for a large slice of users, although there may be a temptation to buy the latest product placed on the market... I found an indispensable occasion, so I exchanged it for an R whose files are great and the autofocus is certainly superior too. Of the REFLEX for now I regret the feeling of the optical viewfinder, especially in situations of strong ambient light. sent on March 08, 2021 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
