|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Tava www.juzaphoto.com/p/Tava  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Manfrotto 496 RC2 Pros: Stable, high quality materials, well built, quality / price ratio Cons: Hardly anyone (see review) Opinion: The only factor against is knowing how to adjust friction between the block and ball, certainly not a fault of the head. For the rest of the head is very solid, usable even with 100-400. A rock with all the targets within the 70 / 100mm. I bought it to replace a head 391RC2 3 moves and I was pleased with the advantages of the sphere sent on August 21, 2014 |
 | Manfrotto 391 RC2 Pros: Well built, quality materials, solid and sturdy Cons: Uncomfortable (depending on use) Opinion: It was my first head coupled to the tripod Manfrotto 190XB, basically I needed a head for landscapes and maybe some pose that requires more stability, but I had left out the factor of speed and ease of the movements so I then replaced with a head always Manfrotto 496RC2 ball. With this are faster to choose the correct location and I can use it as a base 'articulated'. Essentially a three-way head serves those who want to adjust one / two axes at a time, for example video or panoramic, for other uses may be an awkward solution because every time you find yourself staring and adjust each axis by loosening the three knobs each time. sent on August 21, 2014 |
 | Manfrotto 190 XB Pros: Robust, high quality materials, well built, quality / price ratio Cons: Light flickers with telephoto lenses Opinion: Purchased as first tripod staff after trying several models with loans I decided to spend a little more to get a quality product far superior to ordinary tripod useful only to hold the camera sufficiently. Very solid, with objectives heavier or longer is any noticeable flicker. sent on August 21, 2014 |
 | LG Nexus 5 Pros: Price, performance, google updates, beauty and subtlety. Cons: Camera not best managed by software. Opinion: 350 € from the Google Play Store you take home a gem of the latest technology combined with Android, lightweight, goes like a dream. Speaking of the camera, it is good, very good, but the software today and 'still in renovation and will undergo migliorie.rnGia' with the version of Android 4.4.2 KitKat has been much improved the focus and exposure. In 4.4.3 it is said to be improved again, perhaps with the ability to save RAW files. The pictures however are always sharp but sometimes flaw in speed scatto.rnRicordiamoci which is a phone! ;) sent on April 05, 2014 |
 | Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Pros: Solid construction, optical quality, image quality and color saturation, sharpness, resistance to flare, minimal distortion, autofocus, up to 16mm equivalent focal length. Cons: Hood not included, small chromatic aberration at the edges, does not arrive at f/2.8. Opinion: I consider it a great lens, solid, well built and reliable. His only flaws in my opinion are the opening that remains a bit 'standard, it is not affected at all by the fact most of the time this light is intended for landscapes where you close more often, but for a starry heavens f / 2.8 was convenient. Then you have some chromatic aberrations easy to correct, but that may annoy even though they often do not notice. The price is a bit high and annoys not be included even if the lens hood and lens' beautiful but laterally resistant to flare affected. For the rest it is a very good lens that provides excellent color and sharpness enough, we rarely have problems, landscapes shooting will often be satisfactory in all respects and in most 'you Sraa an artistic touch given by the prospects it offers. The USM autofocus and 'almost superfluous as it would stabilize in fact, with this goal, the pdc is often high and the subjects are almost always stationary. I conclude with distortion, even here this lens looks good,In fact, although reaches 10mm (equivalent to 16 to FF) distorts very little although it is expected the tendency toward the fisheye view of the scale, but here and 'minimum and just play a nap with prospects and tilt the lens to have a linear composition, affidabile.rnQuest 'optics in my opinion, is equivalent in performance goals L series sent on March 24, 2014 |
 | Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II Pros: Price, stabilization, compactness, weight, simple to use, revision of previous models, handyman. Cons: Autofocus slow, inaccurate and cumbersome, sharpness that leaves desire, dark, limited range of focal lengths. Opinion: It 'a lens that is often included in the entry-level kit, and in that respect' great, you can not 'pretend to put the 17-55 2.8 USM in that kind of kit. For those who want to start it is useful to try and understand what 's the right kind of photos. And often 'is to be replaced with the Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 and also plain that provides more light first. rnQuesta lens looks like a standard but that often leaves unhappy just because it's the least you can get in terms of performance, there is always a little light, speed 'focus and shutter response that lead along with the results and so as well. Okay for those who make few pictures with your family or for occasional use in short. What is positive is that inspires the purchase of better optics and when you pull out the money you always think what is good, that this lens will teach you to understand what you like and what you would like to do. Council to keep it anyway for a good time and assessing good apputo or if you just want a change. sent on March 24, 2014 |
 | Canon 550D Pros: 7D sensor, compactness, price / performance ratio. Cons: Burst, auto focus and ISO sensitivity from entry-level. Opinion: It 's my first SLR and I can tell that offers many opportunities to begin to specialize and, I preferred to 1100D for both compactness for both the sensor and I was satisfied. Approaches to the professional world and remains a gem always at mano.rnAd today and perhaps' only surpassed by the 100D but I think too small and lacks certain features that the 550D offers instead. This for me is the best choice to start even now (2014) and maybe keep as a second body macchina.rn sent on March 24, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Pros: Brightness, sharpness in the center, price Cons: Quality construction, af inaccurate in low light, Opinion: For the price it's a great goal, but it has many obvious limitations ... On FF has many flaws and little sharpness at the edges, on aps-c is a 8Omm and then becomes a specific use. I was undecided whether to take the 40mm f/2.8 for APS-C was more handyman, 140 € (double this). Personally I was looking for a bright lens that would generate bokeh in quantity while the 40mm had a nicer bokeh (having more blades), but in less quantity. sent on February 24, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
