|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
ACos www.juzaphoto.com/p/ACos  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Motorola Moto G (2015, 3rd gen) Pros: Value for money, reception, waterproofing, operating system stock light and fast, battery life. Cons: Improved display, non-removable battery, unable to snap in, in standard equipment the USB wall jack is missing (there's only the cable). Opinion: I have it for more than a year (05/2016) and I am fully satisfied with it. After the Galaxy S2 I found the offer for this G motorcycle on Amazon paying it around 180 € and I was immediately excited. Balanced dimensions (I do not love the smartphones too big, its 5 inches are in my opinion perfect for every use, ensuring good ergonomics), a good case with anti-slip back shell, ether battery (even months and months of use) and certification IPX7: On the constructive sector - this price - you can not really recriminate anything (the display in my opinion is less "brilliant" than the super-amoled but all in all it's okay). I have the version with 2GB of ram and 16GB of memory (expandable with micro SD) which thanks to the stock version of Android ("naked and raw version" with very few customizations of the manufacturer) makes it really very very fast, maybe even more than some top of the range of the same period (and certainly with less problems: by touching iron I have not MAI, NEVER, NEVER scrapped once). In the phone segment nothing to say, excellent reception and clean audio with frontal loudspeaker; the gps does its job honestly, I would say on average with equal and / or superior band products. Basically, I can only recommend this product that, while falling into the middle as a price and being truly "essential" at SO level, performance and features that make it really an interesting phone.rn sent on September 01, 2017 |
 | Manfrotto Pixi Pros: Price, construction, versatility, size, design. Cons: None (in relation to intended use and price). Opinion: I was given a few months ago from a friend's birthday, and since then I carry it with me always in photographic output. Despite its small size it offers a high load capacity (in my view greater than that declared 1Kg) and the ball head, once blocked, offers a great deal of resistance and improve stability; I have already had occasion to use it with montandogli satisfaction over Canon 7d + Sigma 10-20 (1.330g) and did not even blink. Also ideal for those circumstances in which you want to shoot without a backpack, maybe just with the camera hanging around his neck, but without giving up a paperback but stable support for long exposures. Highly recommended. sent on July 20, 2016 |
 | Lowepro Flipside 300 Pros: Capacity in relation to the dimensions, materials used and therefore resistance, support for retractable tripod, rear opening. Cons: Lack of anti rain cover as the flipside of 400 Opinion: I possess it for several years and despite having made him see all the colors, just a tap with a damp sponge to get it back again. It is very ergonomic and compact; the rear opening is a great convenience, especially in places frequented by attackers, allowing you to make quick changes without lay it on the ground (it uses the belt to run it from behind his back in front within seconds and tilting it remains perfectly balance the pelvis allowing access to the material). I can get us to stay inside 7d, 100-400, 17-50, 10-20 and 30 1.4 more flash, as well as small equipment batteries etc. The only flaw, it lacks the "sack" Rain of which is equipped with the 400 version Highly recommended for kits not too exaggerated. sent on May 31, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
