RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



Pasty
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Pasty



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Pasty


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

fujifilm_xp120Fujifilm XP120

Pros: Good construction, versatility, valid the different shooting modes, pleasant to use, good waterproofing

Cons: quality of the modest image, noisiness

Opinion: Purchased at the end of July before the beach holidays in place of a compact "drowned" the previous year. Pleasant construction, all functions, various video modes, etc. effective and able to provide good exposures. Waterproofness confirmed, its use has been perpetually in snorkeling and apnee for more 'hours a day, I always washed and cleaned according to the directions of fuji honestly very restrictive. At sea the only flaw is that if you bring it in the water for more 'hours, when the camera is totally adapted to the water temperature and then you shoot on the surface you can create condensation inside the protective glass of the 'lens cause strong temperature difference (to note that the external passage --- immersion I did it on several occasions just to avoid the phenomenon but the opposite is obviously not possible). Comfortable controls even during the dive. In short, a rugged rugged, pleasant to use and without operational environmental limits especially if notit is used only by immersion. Pero '.... well the quality' photos with good intensity 'light and' jpeg discrete (you know it's a compact camera) but just go up a few hundred ISO that the situation changes. During the dive, the dedicated modes can only be used if the surface is full and the sun is full. If you go down a few meters or the sky is covered a bit ', you must obviously go up with the ISO. And when you go up with the ISO, but I also speak of a 400, you find yourself in his hands a sensor that pays not only the small size but in my opinion even the old 'project. Of course we must consider the price but the sensor is at the base of its possibility of an effective use in diving or even in snorkeling (considering also that the maximum opening is the one that is). The car costs a little but not much and a BSI CMOS or at least one of the CMOS of the last generation would have made the difference.rnComunque always remains pleasant and fun to use, rugged and underwater there goes without proimpermeability problems. Carefully take pictures in decent diving where I suggest to raise the ISO, do not use the underwater mode and then even if 'a jpeg to correct the white balance sharpness etc in post.rnIf you use it on the beach, at the shore, in the middle of splashes and splashes you will always find it adequate.rnWe say that the sensor of this fuji, fuji has only the name.

sent on December 26, 2017


sigma_50-200osSigma 50-200mm f/4-5.6 DC OS HSM

Pros: construction, compact, stabilizer, MAF precise price

Cons: sharpness over 120mm, chromatic aberration moderate

Opinion: 6 # 39; in focus that zooming). rnLe optical performance even more 'than honest not pogono at the top of his class, but you have the opportunity' to buy an item of quality 'constructive than many competitors offering more and more' often accomplishments all plastic (including bayonet) with embarrassing games from the first day of use. Very suitable for travel photography to hold the weight and size of the kit fotografico.rnIl affordable price then it makes the relationship qualita'ottica-construction / price much interessante.Suggerisco to try it before buying the usual parent plastic.

sent on January 04, 2016


canon_efs24stmCanon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM

Pros: sharpness, color balance, contrast, quality 'constructive

Cons: slight vignetting at f2.8, reduced chromatic aberration visible at the edges at full aperture

Opinion: They are in possession of this lens by six months. Very clear, no flare, beautiful colors, small chromatic aberration at the edges and only at full aperture. Only for APS-c and ideal for photo generalist and street. Since part of my kit does not use nearly as smooth as the tammy 17-50 but I have always considered, optically, a valid objective, and that gave me so much satisfaction. Color, three dimensional 'image and contrast, maybe because it consists of a few lenses and well treated, they are comparable to my f 70-200 f4 L (objective quality' optical amazing). Vignetting not notice above f2.8, very low distortion and visible only in architectural images or lines with vertical sides. Not fast but precise the MAF. Compact, solid and cured with metal bayonet. Value for price / performance excellent. A lens that I love and that I recommend very much.

sent on January 02, 2016




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me