|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Samuele Mambelli www.juzaphoto.com/p/SamueleMambelli  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM Pros: very clear lens in the center / focal lengths of the frame with the soft and gradual blur / has a bokeh from scary / nice compact / while being out of production for a long time keeps well the price on the used and new (it can also be a counter for those who buy) Cons: difficult to use at 1.4, more than 5-6m from the subject, it is likely to have blurred photos (but to say the truth is not said to be either a counter) / not very sharp edges / expensive enough, but it holds the price well Opinion: taken in August for my trip to Vietnam, after so many reflections between the canon 35 1,4 old, the canon 35 1,4II and the sigma 35 1,4 I decided to take "new" the canon 35 1,4 old to I'm not going to talk about why after so much to evaluate, reason, search, and ask for information to industry experts, so I'm preparing a little comparison that you will find on my profile in a few days, but I'll tell you the beautiful and the least beautiful of this lens. A really dated lens (98's project), but really done, a quick and silent focus system is not a mistake at f1.4 but simply needs to be understood. consider that a focus at 1.4 involves a very low focal range, if not mm, so mistake is easy, it is often difficult to understand it by looking in the car but only visible on a monitor. so making so many shots trying to stay motionless is crucial !!!! this optic is mostly use at 1.4 within 5-6m from the subject, gives bokeh for fear, passes by paSharp, crisp, delicate, delicate crisp, this can lead to a lack of clarity at first impression, but if you look at the picture, you notice a sharp scratch that goes slowly down the edges. this is a defect, not a defect, in the sense that its characteristic mark is this softness, this bockeh knife that personally makes me crazy (similar to 135mm f 2). the only true defect in this lens that is more than 5-6m should close the diaphragm at at least f2 to return sharply sharp, in fact at f1.4 with distant subjects this softness becomes "pastone" losing its great sharpness in the center. Attention is not to say that it is a slider because as mentioned just close the diaphragm, but at distance it is difficult to use the 1.4. for the rest I love this lens there are those who define it magically, with character, I just say that the pictures that come up make it !!!! I use it with satisfaction also on APS-C where I was astonished as a rendering, I was losing weight more than FFrn sent on November 24, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 300mm f/2.8 L IS USM Pros: Sharpness, construction, fast AF, usable in freehand Cons: If I propose I have to find it, ff without multiplier could be short, but it always depends on what you want to photograph. Opinion: Exceptional optics, bought for use in the release period of the Series II. Exceptional sharpness already at f2.8 but from the best of f4 af 10, I use it with extended canon extended 1,4II and I have to say that it behaves very well, although at f4 "it loses a bit of sharpness" ( But it's really good, but it's almost entirely f5,6.rnil bokeh is fantastic, contrasts with perfection with its sharp clarity, its use for naturalistic photography, tend to employ it between f5,6 and f8 allowing light but it is It's a real pity because it's fiddling between f2.8 and f4, ideal if you want to make close-ups of animals or if you're trying to get rid of the exaggerated background. This optic has always been presented as one of the best ever made by canon, and after Having tried the series II I can say it's really cool !!!! Obviously the new one is better in many respects, but if you do not use it for professional reasons, you do not even notice the difference. sent on July 24, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
