|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Michele Lore www.juzaphoto.com/p/MicheleLore  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 70-300mm F4-5.6 DG Macro Pros: Price, Focal Cons: Sharpness, Brightness, AF, mechanical, construction, non-stabilized Opinion: I must say that the focus is nothing short scandente as Sharpness horrible! only two of 10 shots are on fire! It is not clear, and shows a lot of AC close to the center, vignetting is not as bad as the rest, but you notice it. The only comfort is up to 300 mm (although the quality is poor!) And if you want to be comfortable even the macro option 200 to 300 mm, which allows you to stay away from subjects such as butterflies and insects! I tried it for an afternoon of sunshine thanks to a friend who lent me this objective to see if the 300mm enough for me to photograph wildlife (and I must say that I'm happy to 300mm on APS-C), NEVER would purchase this objective by poor quality to say the least! Of course if you have little money and want to take a tele this is convenient, but if you can afford the Sigma 70-300 is better to forget instantly! In conclusion, this objective is poor and very disappointing! Much better than those who aim to sharpness and AF! sent on September 25, 2012 |
 | Canon 60D Pros: handy, lightweight, adjustable display, sensor as the 7D, HD video, technologically advanced Cons: rumone at high iso, lack micro-adjustment, not tropical, 9 point AF, requires high quality lenses! Opinion: is my first DSLR, and I must say that I am very satisfied! Knowing that it is a semi-professional is great, only one step below the 7D. not magnesium but sturdy and durable, the quality is very good but must be purchased objectives of high quality to make the most of it. With ISO 1600-3200 is not very noticeable noise, overtaking there is a significant noise without PP. the swiveling display is very handy in macro photography or when you are in a large crowd to take pictures with your hands up, also useful in the video to give a particular shot. Tropicalization missing but it would be convenient for those who often makes trips where the weather changes quickly, and the micro-regulation is missing, but can risultarsi useful only in rare cases. I feel useless creative filters and raw processing directly on the machine, why? filters are mostly for "geeks" not for a semi-professional, and processing raw and convenient only to decrease the weight of the picture "not great", Iexplain: this function using only photos that I have seen no exceptional but simply good, so as to process the raw drive and save a jpeg file that weighs four times less! for great pictures better go to the pc and open DPP or CAMERA RAW. Personally I would have removed the basic functions such as portrait, landscape, night shot, auto, creative auto, sports, macro and added a C1 C2 C3, but it is still a semi-pro. As a first reflex meets a lot! especially when used with L-series lenses! (Obtained with the 18-135 that was very disappointed!) When I can not think of anything else ... I recommend it to children and women for the light body and small, recommended to those who want to enter the world of EOS from a semi-professional feature-rich! sent on August 06, 2012 |
 | Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Pros: Light, "handyman", stabilizer Cons: AF slow, chromatic aberration evident Unclear Opinion: is a good all-rounder for the first steps in photography, still better than 18-55. Purchased in a kit with the 60D, but after a few months I get the error in agreement quest'obbiettivo, f has a slow that only sometimes in very good condition it is fast, the aberration is very obvious and ruin the 18 Megapixels my 60D being blurry! serves only entry in the photograph, then be changed with a better lens in my opinion! sent on August 06, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
