RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



Amarante.G.
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Amarante.G.



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Amarante.G.


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

nikon_z6Nikon Z6

Pros: Workable files, good white balance in the car, excellent high iso yield. Ergonomics, menu and classic Nikon feel then almost zero adaptation time coming from reflex of the same house.

Cons: Inconsistency AF in afc and tracking, false positives in afs, face detetct equally inconstant. single slot.

Opinion: my term of comparison is the d750 that I have been using for 3 years with extreme satisfaction. I bought this summer the z6 taking advantage of the cashback, the curiosity to try it was a lot. Well, if on the one hand we have a very good sensor that returns beautiful colors and good rows even at high iso (better even than the d750 both as a holding of the dynamic range and in terms of noise of chroma and luminance) on the other side we have a machine absolutely unreliable for work use due to AF. my use is mainly reportage (both in ambient light and with the help of flash) and I have to say that several times I found myself having to store it (in the evening and in soft light situations) and to continue the work with the d750. Many times when in afs returned green square confirmation had actually focused behind or forward (and we know well that with ML and native lenses is not allowed front/back focus, so it is just false positive). With d750, and in afc, I have the certainty to always take home the shot and if the machine gives me the confirmation of the fire I am sure that that area is in focus x really (relative error of F/b focus aside). I paired it with its 24-70 f2.8 s, so it certainly wasn't the lens matched the problem. I will definitely resell it in favor of a d850 and keep the 24-70s (great zoom, very sharp) waiting for an ML product finally mature. The path taken by Nikon is definitely the right one (remember everyone that Sony took several generations between aps-c and ff before producing really reliable machines?). However, the Af must be consistent, precise and far more than the current one (-2ev declared). 24/10/19 update: the machine (in case of poor light and in afs) never prefers the assist light of the sled flash mounted on it but always uses only the green side lin (which with the use of zoom or large fixed is really ineffective). It is precisely the ML that deliberately excludes the assist light because having fire technology other than that reflex would not have any benefit with that type of red lamp. You have to wait for them to produce a dedicated flash with assist lamp dedicated to ML.

sent on October 23, 2019


nikon_d750Nikon D750

Pros: High waist, great Af, well handleable without being mastodontic, the tilting screen is very useful. Excellent dynamic range of the sensor.

Cons: (IMPORTANT XI POSSESSORS, read the side down in the review) One on all the problem of the shutter block. If the machine is affected sooner or later the shutter breaks with the risk of damaging the sensor. The WB car on some occasions does not convince me a lot. I often miss the dedicated Af-ON button besides the AEL (which is instead).

Opinion: Great machine, reliable autofocus, accurate in exhibitions. You can rely on the lateral AF points (especially in af-c, af-s and with low lights on the sides I can get rid of you not to hook) with eyes closed. Very good tracking.rnA very good Spot Spot Module that preserves high lights (basically helps you to expose it without burning the lights you see in the scene). RnResistive to iso, you can push it quietly at 12800 exposing well, even to 6400 correcting a bit in post.rnrnOra we come to the counter. The machine was quite unlucky, with 3 official calls (Flare, shadows caused by the tendons and shutter block). The only big trouble (and I find it really weird that no - Still wrote) is the tide of machines with shutter problems even OUT OF REQUIREMENT.rnEach serial machine that does NOT fall into the official call (the third and last of the series of calls) .nnPossiedo 2 D750 both bought in June 2016 From different dealers, both do not fall into any richIamo.rnUna has 27 thousand shots and is perfect, the other has 12,000 shots and has the problem with the shutter. Rn What is it and how it looks? RnIn practice the shutter risks blocking and breaking and if you are Unlucky, you may risk scratching the sensor.rnTo check whether the machine is stained you have to do the first click at 1 / 4000s just switched on and with an inactive shutter for a couple of days.rn So leave it a few days and then make the first Snooze time with 1 / 4000s. If the machine goes into the block with the word "Err" on the display then your machine is affected.rnTo unlock it just press the shutter button again.rnOnce the machine will no longer be blocked (at least Start.) The problem is degenerative, it will tend to appear even slower in times of time and even with a hot machine (so in the good while you are photographed) to the final break of the shutter. RnNital replaces, at LTR, the shutters present I asked the question and came backOr in the call though with a European warranty. RnNital replaces the shutters also for serial machines that do NOT fall into the recall (only with Nital warranty). The waiting times are very long due to shortage of spare parts due to the amount of machines that have the Problem.rnFor different guarantees you must contact your vendor or send it privately to replace the shutter.rnNit Nital in the various dealers cover as a guarantee the damage that can result from the sensor from the break of the shutter.rnIf you have the machine that shows "Err "With the first cold shutter and 1 / 4000s, do not delay too much to replace the shutter or risk 800 euro of sensor. RnrnThere is the link to test the serial (only for the shutter block): rnrnhttp: //advisory.nikonrepair .eu / Language_Select_D750_2.aspxrnrnThank you all, I'm very happy about this machine, far less than the "ambiguous" behavior of Nikon that does not extend the serial and does not spin a gene call RnEDIT (18-07-17): Nikon has finalmThe body decided to go out and declare many other serial numbers that are part of the call (this time it is said to be dedicated to the defective shutter) .nn Then if your Nikon comes under the new call, you can replace the shutter free (even from private And then make you reward ;-)) .rnThere is the link for verification of the serial: rnhttp: //www.nikonusa.com/en/service-and-support/service-advisories/ibs1kfdg/Technical-Service-Advisory-for- Users-of-the-Nikon-D750.htmlrnrn

sent on July 03, 2017


panasonic_lx100Panasonic Lumix LX100

Pros: Bokeh, electronic viewfinder, manual controls, ISO held high (for the sensor size), good processability of the file (always thinking that comes from a 2.2 crop factor sensor), af good for the category. Filters 43mm (inexpensive). multi-aspect sensor. Damn beautiful.

Cons: Very annoying flare backlit, sharpness subdued compared to the price (but good for a compact), size too minute, a limited zoom range while. high price. LR does not recognize the lens profile, so it is impossible to correct the raw automatically (fortunately does not suffer much distortion).

Opinion: It 'a great compatta.rnLa you check well after a short time, manual controls and quite semplice.rnSe menu the ultimate goal is printing, the sharpness will be more than enough, but if you always look at the file at 100% and maybe you also has a reflex then you will want more clarity, let's say that I would have expected more from a car that costs almost 700 euro (but remember that it is a compact one of a kind) .rnOttima brightness of the lens (F1.7 to 24mm and f2 .8 to 75mm) with a good bokeh (the sensor is almost a 4/3), good high sealing ISO.rnFile quite malleable, allows you to get the jpeg room pretty much as you want by adjusting the curves, colors, sharpness and so on. RN12 megapixel are just to do a little of everything (and then better if it holds well the iSO rather than a thousand thousand megapizze knead) .rnLa focus is good and also has a location Macro that allows some ingrandimento.rnAvrei pleasing was also a more ergonomic sleeping (pi ù generous in short) maybe hosting a lens a little wider (75mm are often short, maybe 90mm would be enough without becoming too much and ruin the sharpness) .rnHo improved ergonomics matching wooden handle (not that it was not enough but I do not I was looking for a tiny car but a complete, compact ergonomics also) .rnLo stabilizer does not seem miraculous (I had a SonyA772 and the stabilized more) but it is ultimately buono.rnrnIn, it is a nice car, great charm, easy to use and effective, it always has to tile dietro.rnOttima a kit reflex.rnNon is perfect and, given the difettucci, I think something should cost less to nuova.rnUsata instead is an excellent acquisto.rnrnPer as I see it, already no flare and with a sharpness sleeping more would be its soldi.rnrnP.s .: Do not buy the hood of the JJC. And 'metal and solid, ok, but it generates strong vignetting at focal next to the lower limit (24mm) .rnIo I caught ignoring the thing and now I'll try to shorten it.

sent on September 02, 2016


sony_85_f2-8Sony 85mm f/2.8 SAM

Pros: Economic.

Cons: Plasticky, TA chromatic aberrations, slow af.

Opinion: 0D At the end is an economical lens from good compromise quality / price especially if purchased used, very useful for beginners or those who want a lens from portrait without spending large sums and without any particular demands in terms of focus.

sent on February 15, 2016


sony_35_f1-8Sony DT 35mm f/1.8 SAM

Pros: Excellent value for money. Good blurred, good sharpness than f2.

Cons: Plasticky, the presence of chromatic aberrations at full aperture, disappear by closing slightly the diaphragm.

Opinion: Good lens, economic and good yield. About 54mm of aps-c, slightly longer than normal but it is better a 35mm a 28mm, 28 would be too many optical distortion for a lens "handyman" as a normal should be. Autofocus is not a splinter but even a snail. For what it costs it is good to approach to the control of depth of field.

sent on January 24, 2016


sony_a77iiSony A77 II

Pros: fast and precise AF, burst, ergonomics, compatibility with optical Minolta, numerous physical controls, customizable buttons, excellent electronic viewfinder lag-free.

Cons: Invasive noise from ISO 3200 onwards (relatively clean files up to 1600 ISO), battery life (is the price of the electronic viewfinder).

Opinion: And 'born and designed to portray fast moving subjects, the 24 Megapixel then help a lot in very useful crop in birdlife and sport.rnAutofocus as a reference for its segment (79 points including 15 cross) thanks to slt.rnOttimi systems technology tracking and recognition of faces from, combined with the extensive selection of af sensors, continuous focus and fast burst make a quick sniper rifle. rnPer the uninitiated, the SLT (Translucent mirror) consists of a semi-transparent fixed mirror placed at 45 ° in front of the mirror sensore.rnTale diverts about 30% of the light from the sensor to the sensors AF.rnIn this way it is possible to ' use of detection by phase and contrast contemporaneamente.rnLa techn. Slt coupled to the electronic viewfinder produces a machine that shows real-time, in the viewfinder and on the monitor, the variations of the various parameters on the show even before scattare.rnIl downside is not really an excellent performance at high ISO, compared to current APS-C competitors that make better (well until 1600, bad in 6400,compromise with loss of detail in 3200) and battery life (but decent) because of the double electronic monitor (the normal one and the viewfinder) .rnIl Jpeg machine is very soft (from 800 ISO and up) because the algorithm denoising rather invasivo.rnBuona the DRO management of lights and shadows on jpeg.rnOttime dynamic range and depth of 16-50 colore.rnIl 2.8 provided in the kit fits great with this machine, very good lens to start and covers all the "common" needs with good brightness and a pleasant sfocato.rnSecondo me is a very good car, that makes ergonomics and speed his best weapons, is not the most suitable for shooting in low light conditions, but can say her in all other contexts.

sent on November 01, 2015




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me