|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Nicolò Ricci www.juzaphoto.com/p/NicoloRicci |
Fujifilm XF 23mm f/1.4 R Pros: Constructive quality, colors, blurred, focus ring Cons: nobody Opinion: After several months of use I must say that it is definitely the best lens I have ever had. RnThe use for anything, portraits included, merit of a wonderful blur. RnThe focus ring is so well designed to make the autofocus (though fast) useless. RnThe photos are always perfect, under any condition of light. The colors are gorgeous, once you shoot very little post production, the photos come out as you want them to be. RnI have not tried the metal hood yet, but I think it will be one of the next purchases. sent on July 03, 2017 |
Manfrotto Pixi Pros: Price, Construction, Portability Cons: nobody Opinion: He has become an irreplaceable companion for many months. For my mirrorless it's perfect, very stable. The most interesting thing is definitely portability: it's perfectly in my camera bag. Now I use it more than the older brother. I think that at this price there is nothing better. Sometimes I do not even want to carry my purse, but it's so compact that I'm in my jacket. sent on June 30, 2017 |
Fujifilm XF 60mm f/2.4 R Macro Pros: Sharpness, construction, size, price, blurred. Cons: Nobody. Opinion: This optical Fuji is just perfect for a photograph "rational." The autofocus is slow, I guess because of the lens geometry. Camera shake is always lurking and less than 1/100 is virtually impossible to shoot. Personally I prefer the manual focus with this 60mm, thanks to the excellent ergonomics and the software / viewfinder of my XT-10. In ideal conditions, ie with stand and after a careful focus, gives the pictures just perfect. The files that are obtained do not even have to be placed, can be zoomed almost indefinitely as they are now. The thing that strikes me most is precisely the clarity that you get, even already at F2.4. So much so that I am using a little 'all at this time. The results obtained with the portraits are remarkable. The focal length is ideal in relation to the opening of the maximum aperture. The blur is really much pleasant. Macros are very well, but it takes a good dose of patience. Insects moving are really hard to capture, but with plenty of light you can not do everything. Let's say that in macro capabilities are able to just test them with flowers and static objects so far. The price has fallen dramatically, and I managed to find this 60, used, less than 300 Euros. I left very disappointed initially, then I learned to use it and now I'm really glad I bought. sent on August 23, 2016 |
Fujifilm XF 18-55 f/2.8-4R LM OIS Pros: Price, sharpness, construction. Cons: capricious AF. Opinion: I paid in kit with xt-10 350 Euro. (650 + 400-50 cash back fuji) rnPer the price that the picture quality is sbalorditiva.rnLa sharpness is impressive at every opening. Shooting with f> 4 images are literally perfect from one corner of the frame.rnE 'built very well to be a 18-55, is all metal, the selectors to have a pleasant optics based feedback, zoom and the convenient ring aperture as well. The first impression is that you had abbinasse perfectly to my XT-10, both aesthetically and functionally. The stabilization is very good and you shoot quietly under 1/10 of a second. rnHo found very pleasant blurred 55mm.rnDopo to four months of use I have found almost exclusively of small imperfections that, given the cost of the product in question, does not weigh on my most obvious finale.rnLa judgment is the focus that sometimes It makes the tantrums (software problem). I also believe that the hood and above the tappor lens are not designed properly. Finally, the minimum focusing distance seemed a bit 'too much, especially comparing it with that of rivals (which I believe is in any case much lower) rn sent on April 08, 2016 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me