|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Animatrix79 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Animatrix79  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: Stabilizer truly amazing, Unexpected Sharpness and cleaning Image 300mm, Construction Solid, precise focus ring, Ultrasonic Motor with nothing to envy to Canon. Cons: Light game on the bayonet when mounted on the camera, zoom ring that runs in reverse compared to Canon. Opinion: I possessed the Canon 70-300 IS USM and I expected to get rid of it to switch to a Sigma 70-200 f / 2.8 EX OS HSM. rnAvendo revalued on how to invest temporarily available budget, I gave away the Canon and I wanted to bet on this Tamron 70-300 in combination with a 6D and then with the possibility to cover the missing stop aperture with the large capacity of 6D ISO up to and maintain the image of that lens pulita.rnLe expectations, after reading several reviews, having viewed several different tests and test beyond. rnSiamo much on the Canon 70-300 IS USM inexplicably costs about 100 euro more than this lens, but that is really far behind in this building Tamron.rnLa touch is perceived to be above it. The optics transmits strength and solidity ... is heavier than the Canon and not of poco.rnQuesto Tamron than the Canon it has a true ultrasonic motor ring with the possibility of "Full Time Manual Focus". The fire is accurateand fast as the Canon's ring-type USM. The difference on the firepower with the corresponding Canon is abysmal. The Canon has the front lens that rotates and stretches when focheggia thus creating diffcioltà to be able to use certain types of filters and does not allow manual focus without first sgnacia engine. The Tamron is extremely faster, as quiet as you would expect from fire engines ultrasonic, the front lens does not rotate and does not stretch during the fire and then you can use all the filters without problemi.rnI two strengths that I have really hit of this lens are the stabilizer and detail. We are very, very far from Canon ... stabilizer you see right away that it is a different category. It emits more or less the same hissing when the Canon comes into operation, but the picture is really glued edges once it enters into operation. I could take to 300mm (three hundred millimeters) with times of 1/20 (one twentieth) obtaining an image in sharp focus and without any kind of micromosso.rnInutile saythat Canon will not get to this level because of a significant loss of detail to 300mm which alone tend to knead the immagine.rnCon the Tamron 300mm f / 5.6 we continue to have a truly noteworthy detail ... the image is engraved, clean, crisp. Probably not having tried the best performing as a lens 70-200 L f / 4 I have no benchmarks higher but with my old Canon 70-300 IS USM are definitely on another planet. rnL'ottica and makes it so much, probably complicit in this excellent 6D. I wanted to bet on this objective preferring 100mm rock at an aperture of f / 2.8 classics 70-200. To hazard a bet that I had to mature confidence that it merges with a 6D, the latter has its more than excellent performance at high ISO. For now it seems a winning bet. A lens with a value of really high level. sent on September 18, 2015 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: Astonishing yield high ISO, image quality, with MAF midpoint very good, compact body with excellent grip and ergonomics even for large hands. Cons: Being a body placed in band semipro perhaps articulated screen. rnPer else other plus would make too much closer to 5DIII compromising the excellent value for money. Opinion: I worked for a long as a second photographer for weddings using the 7D. After I cut his teeth with the well-known limitations of an APS-C such as the 7D joined the slavery of Flash for no more than 2000 ISO where the 7D shows already compromised image quality from color noise and grain evident, the qualitative leap the 6D is mostruoso.rnQuello of which I desperately needed was a body machine reliable enough to use in peace even setting auto ISO abandoning the use of the flash during the day I could not do without. Imagine what it means to rely on the flash when you're forced to shoot in difficult conditions controluci type or where you do not have the time to manage a completely manual machine ... shots that are never linear with each other and that we must correct and balance in post. The 6D cancels all ciò..ho could shoot up to ISO 12800 (DODICIMILAOTTOCENTO) in conditions of very low light and when I got to review the shots for me was fiction. A ISO 12800 machine comincia then to produce some grain completely manageable with little in post-production for a click sound and absolutely clean without seeing blacks smashed, details that are lost between the grain and the color noise as they did on the 7D over raising the ISO 1600. This translates into the ability to rely on the machine using several automatic, like that of ISO automatic, without fear that the machine combines some trouble and could trigger repeatedly in some particular moments finally getting linear images with light and color and much more natural. Weight much reduced during the work given by the absence of Flash (I used the Canon 600EX-RT) and good performance of the MAF with central point which is what I use going to turn off all altri.rnPotevo afford a 5DIII but several plus that are paid not just on 5DIII from complex system of MAF, I did not need for the type of work I do and how I carry it myself. This 6D was a purchase more than guessed. Unlike FF to APS-C mostruosa. Now I can work with more confidence, having optimized a lot of time post production could now already on the field taking pictures which in themselves are already valid without post production. sent on August 15, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
