|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Valadrego Uci www.juzaphoto.com/p/ValadregoUci  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sony E 55-210mm f/4.5-6.3 OSS Pros: beautiful, compact, light Cons: Dark, sharpness Opinion: Dark lens and non-stellar sharpness. The ambitious photo amateur would do better to take directly the 70 350 g oss just released since it is more contrasted and also has a much greater excursion... the autofocus of this is valid and responsive, but I tried it on a6000, not on the new bodies. Aesthetically it is well cared for, I would say suitable more for the casual amateur than for the evolved photo amateur sent on August 25, 2017 |
 | Sony E 50mm f/1.8 OSS Pros: crisp, bright, beautiful bokeh, stabilized Cons: anything Opinion: another solid option for sony and APSC ... does not disappoint in anything from construction to quality image sharpness mind you ... just that it's ideal for a short ambientati busts and portraits media ... so maybe you should inform the 35 f1.8 oss of which feels slightly speak less as it is not clear up to these levels (speech then more relativized opening) sent on June 13, 2016 |
 | Sony E 35mm f/1.8 OSS Pros: stabilized, silent, sharp enough Cons: nothing in particular Opinion: if you want your first hard for sony E APSC I would say this is the best candidate ... somewhere between 50 1.8 and 24 zeiss .... It is solid in that it does not disappoint in any respect! Sharp, quick and silent nell'autofocus, compact, well-built, bright and stabilized. It remains only the price at home sony is always a little 'higher end ... sent on June 13, 2016 |
 | Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Pros: weight, size, stability, engine, ridiculous price in kit Cons: you know the little sharpness under 20 with large openings. Distortion and vignetting can be corrected in a click Opinion: Unclear is also under f5.6 to f8 ... dxo find graphics on detailed graphics .... Try to think if it was clear and offered the same at that price, and that size would have been a capolavoro..rnIo say that in kit you can not make the mistake of not taking it. You can take a ride in the mountains and landscapes perfect to pull off f8 taking the camera in your pocket if desired. You can sell almost anything without losing ... rnnaturalmente not worth it to buy it partea over 300 euro ... rnSi can control it remotely from your smartphone zoom ... sent on June 13, 2016 |
 | Sony A3000 Pros: image quality, ease of use, good ergonomics, price Cons: viewfinder display, responsiveness Opinion: I will be concise: the sensor is great as the price. Just as soon as the light drops to focus on the display and even worse in the viewfinder it becomes difficult even if the photo could potentially be very valid. If in fact we consider that this is an entry level just for those who are not so practical that I would say is a product designed very poorly. That is the paradox is that those wishing to try the excellent sensor Sony having already good experience, something good we quarry, while for those who are starting out is hard. The autofocus of course for this price is still old design contrasting but now we go to phase detection. I have replaced it with the sony a6000 with which I am now very well. I think when it will be replaced by the A3100 or do not know what the name, simply by improving the display the concept of this camera will take effect. Until then better stay away ... sent on August 06, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
