|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Giove63 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Giove63  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 14-150mm f/4-5.6 II Pros: Weight and focus, sharp and incisive enough, moderately priced (for a 28-300 as the focal 4/3 is multiplied by 2), constructively honest, tropical conditions. Cons: Construction definitely improved, missing the hood sold separately, US engine failure. Opinion: Everything I tried to do honest with the formula "touch and try" Olympus for three days. More than satisfactory results and no fact to do given the price. Compared with 28-300 Nikon VR (FF) it is certainly much stronger. It suffers a bit 'at maximum focal sull'AF but nothing serious. In summary a good lens honest and useful to leave the backpack fixed focal. The trial compared the type of use is definitely positive. sent on June 05, 2015 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Pros: Sensor (optimally sized and high quality), 10 fps burst, construction, quality of the file (to say the least surprising), 5-axis stabilization in the room, weight, available buttons, tropicalization, general ergonomics. Cons: Camera menu a bit 'messy and not easy to consult, too many modes "scenes" absolutely useless to you then seriously (even if it was for me leverei video modes and wifi), suffers a bit' (but very little) above 1600 iso (anything that is not ovviabile with a very slight editing), working in burst mode the battery grip is necessary because the battery has a very limited time. Opinion: It states that from Nikonist (since 1983) I was very skeptical towards Olympus and more generally to the mirrorless. Seated next to my Nikon the impression it gives is that of a toy, but when you put the switch "on" the music changes quickly the EM 1 pulls out his teeth and, coupled with the 12-40 f2.8 PRO (actually the focal length is multiplied by 2, then a 24-80), bakes really incredible things that have nothing to envy to FF (Testing with Nikon D700 and 24-70mm f2.8). In summary the OM D EM 1 is a "toy" that can confront perfect beyond belief with the FF large blazon. Zuiko lenses (and Nikonist historian I am very sorry to say) as quality have nothing to envy to the top of the range Nikon with infinitely lower prices (see for yourself the range f 2.8 PRO! 12-40 and 40-150). Findings absolutely positive both for amateurs (evolved) and professionals some friends photographers are in fact using the OM D EM 1 with extreme satisfaction. sent on June 05, 2015 |
 | Panasonic Lumix GF1 Pros: Compact, light, good quality file, ergonomics and dislocation of the commands, features both Leica lenses that Olympus, full menu and easy to manage, build quality excellent, excellent live view, slide flash7accessori with possibility to add the viewfinder (optional and maybe a bit 'too expensive) Cons: For the moment no one Opinion: I bought it more for fun than conviction, but above all to have a more compact camera with the possibility of interchangeable lenses. Already at the first test, combined with the Olympus Zuiko 14-42, has been able to surprise me for the quality of the files (raw remarkable) and the various possibilities of setting the menu well thought out. A "handyman" precious in my business trips where it is impossible to load in two plane cabin baggage. sent on April 28, 2015 |
 | Olympus E-420 Pros: Double slot, internal stabilization, available commands, lightness, 64 iso, battery life (eternal Parthian). Cons: Lcd not particularly powerful, live view a bit 'dated compared to competitors in the same period, up to 1600 ISO. Opinion: I heard defame E420 in many ways but, honestly who has defamed her never found a true feeling. The first consideration is that we are talking about an SLR "entry level" by more than affordable price. Combined with the 14-42 3.5 / 5.6 has always given me great shots even in light situations quite critical. The body has excellent ergonomics and are not totally agree on the slowness. Definitely suffer a little 'longer focal lengths of 40-150 but also in this case is defended more than well it is an "entry level". My opinion, as the investment is definitely positive. sent on March 28, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5 D IF ED Pros: Price used (is in excellent condition around 350 euro), yield 3.5 focus, clarity, weight Cons: Building a bit 'plasticky, a bit' gloomy at 4.5 but still acceptable. Opinion: I used it with some satisfaction on both APS C than on FX and I have always ensured that the most honorable results in various lighting conditions. The collars are fluid and the focus in MF precise. The focal allows use landscape more than satisfactory and the distortion is more than acceptable. Mechanically, I made choices a bit 'more qualitative but it is the only real flaw I can find him. For me positive experience. sent on March 10, 2015 |
 | Nikon D700 Pros: Sensor beautifully sized, file quality, fantastic construction, ergonomics and dislocation commands, video loss, reliability and generally speaking for shots at high ISO. Cons: Only CF, lack SD slot, weight when combined with BG MB-D10. Opinion: E 'became part of the equipment and FF as a second body, slowly, it is winning the role of the main body (the first body is a D750, the biggest mistake ever made. A toy disguised as FF) .rnAffidabile , fast, solid. Is giving me, is combined with fixed focal, is combined with the zoom, much pleasure. Responds very well even when the number of ISO is high. Combined with AF-S 24-70mm f / 2.8 G ED AF-S and all'Nikon 70-200mm f / 2.8 G ED VR II is able to give great results. Surely the Nikon body that in relation to the price paid is giving me more satisfaction. sent on March 02, 2015 |
 | Nikon D300 Pros: Robust construction typically pro, excellent sensor well-sized, ergonomic, distribution dials and buttons. Cons: Weight (especially combined with battery grip MB-D10), but more than acceptable visible noise at high ISO. Opinion: Since the first approach the D300 gives the impression of a pro camera. Robust and ergonomically appealing even if the weight gets a little 'feel. As someone wrote before me the D300 requires a period of study to be able to fully understand but once tuned into will give you great satisfaction. Combined with the Sigma 17-70 HSM Macro 1.2.8-4.5 has outdone herself, accurate shots even in quite extreme. The only feasible after the jump D300 is only the Full Frame. Although I switched to FF I find it hard to part with. sent on February 25, 2015 |
 | Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 DC Macro Pros: Precise, bright, sharp and strong. Excellent build quality. Cons: AF a bit 'cumbersome and noisy. Opinion: Lens that I use often is coupled to a D7000 that a D300 with excellent results. Much better performance than the 18-70 Nikon AF S DX that I had tried previously. The image stabilization is not done and regret in not very favorable light conditions also performs its job very well. I use it to take pictures of landscapes and architectural contexts with great satisfaction. sent on February 25, 2015 |
 | Nikon D7000 Pros: Compact, light, well-sized sensor, dual SD slot, battery life, solid construction, good performance at high ISO average. Used price affordable. Cons: Autofocus a bit 'slow and the sensor tends to get dirty quite easily. Opinion: Excellent for hunting camera, handy, honestly I can not fault. The autofocus apathetic struggling a bit 'in the light conditions are not optimal but recovers always offering excellent results. I prefer the D7000 16.3 MP to 24 MP of the D7100 that in some situations become a bit 'too "dense". In good summary, together with the D300s, an irreplaceable piece of my equipment APS-C. sent on February 03, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
