|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Moroder7 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Moroder7  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF-S 28mm f/1.8 G Pros: Light, sharp, flare resistance Cons: Sharpness to TA Opinion: Used as normal on D7200, it is the optics that I prefer as everything do both for visual field and for brightness. Only flaw a little soft at 1.8 But those aperci is there. For the rest excellent resistance to flare and great sharpness across the frame. Distortion on DX almost absent. I recommend for those looking for a normal on DX that has superior performance to the classic 35 1.8 sent on March 09, 2019 |
 | Tokina AT-X 11-20mm f/2.8 PRO DX Pros: Bright, solid, crisp, versatile Cons: MAF Pass ring, 11mm distortion, flare, maybe it lacks a mm of wide angle compared to the competition Opinion: Starting with the cons, the classic Tokina flare is also present on this optic, but having also had the 11-16 II, I can affirm that things have improved, both in terms of resistance and aesthetic, or when it is present is not so unpleasant. It distorts a bit to 11mm, nothing that can not be corrected in PP but it is a thing to take into account during the shooting. The ring nut to switch from AF to MF is uncomfortable and not really fluid. The positive sides of this lens outclass the negatives abundantly... The brightness of the lenses and the sharpness, acceptable even at the edges, make it the best wide angle for DX. Before him I had the 11-16 2.8 and then the Nikon 10-24 3.5-5.6, and I tried the Sigma 10-20 3.5 of a friend. The only one that I regret is the Nikon but only for the extreme versatility, however the Tokina 11-20 tears it with low hands in brightness and sharpness, especially at the edges. The 11-20 focal range covers a wide spectrum of wide angle/superwide angles so much that I've kept it mounted for a long time in several trips and mountain hikes. For APS-C I don't think there's any better... sent on March 09, 2019 |
 | Nikon AF 70-210mm f/4-5.6 D Pros: Risolvenza, cost, construction, relatively light Cons: the usual cheap paintings and dark Opinion: I was looking for an inexpensive canvas for my APSC. The choice fell on this because the best compromise between quality and price are satisfied. Sharpness and contrast are better is that of the 16-85 18-140 (with the same focal clearly). It gives better 5.6-8. Focus without shame, without praise. I want to clarify that they are inexperienced and it is my first and only tele sent on March 14, 2016 |
 | Fujifilm X30 Pros: Compact, manual controls, brightness, good RAW files, optical viewfinder Cons: noise at high ISO, focal length Opinion: I had the Fuji X30 for about 9 months. I 'was my first camera semi-serious, after that I switched to SLR. I would recommend this camera to the neophytes of photography or those seeking a second light body maintaining a decent image quality. And 'to appreciate the manual controls, the various shortcuts to adjust the basic parameters, the brightness of the lens and jpeg files that churns. The focal length is a little limiting but is perfect for travel or reportage. rn sent on January 04, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
