|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Gwaenchana www.juzaphoto.com/p/Gwaenchana  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Manfrotto zaino medio per fotocamera, obiettivi (MB MA-BP-GPM) Pros: Dimensions, practicality, immediacy, aesthetics, materials, essentials, finishes Cons: Sub-secondary aspects Opinion: The style is Manfrotto: a bit pricey compared to other less well-known brands, but if you like the line, the hopes are not bad. The size is the perfect one for a mirrorless kit * not * limited to the essentials. At the moment I get a Fuji x-t20 (with handgrip and handstrap) with 56mm f / 1.2, a Fuji x-m1 with 18-55, a Sony Nex6 with 16mm f / 2.8, a gopro with mini gamepad, a Godox TT350 flash, various chargers and the remaining space would allow many other implementations. All this in size that cuts with the laws of physics, because the sight looks really small.rn The front pocket, which usually sounds like a note stoned in many bags, is unexpectedly large. There is a comfortably sized bumper of a 10 "padded tablet of any conceivable cavity and more, and also comfortable pockets where to insert any powerbank and similia.rnThe shoulders are well finished, padded right and without falling into the rigidity of some backpacks for "mission impossible"% 3B.rn The vaguely rounded shape does not allow for particular stability and tactile inconsistencies. Weight is well distributed. If you want, you can also hook up a small easel but, if necessary, it seems to me something dissociated from the product philosophy, but is a subjective vision.rnThe aesthetic is pleasant and no frills.rn * I do not * find it suitable for a reflex kit, because the depth of the various compartments does not seem to have been designed for such dimensions.rnIn summary it is a smart backpack , cute and very practical and, in my opinion, as such should be conceived. It is unnecessary to buy it if you plan to build it as a migrant boat, because it would lose the concept of "small and light" and also the essentiality to which it recalls. Recommended for quiet travel, walks, trips. for a bargain, a whole store in the backpack.rnIt was not meant to hold a 13 ", but that I kneweven before purchasing it. sent on November 15, 2017 |
 | Fujifilm X-T20 Pros: Aesthetics, size, weight, sensor, portability, viewfinder, lcd, evf quality Cons: Grip Opinion: Years sell my all (beautiful) reflex equipment for a form of photographic indigestion. My re-engagement with this passion has meant to start from scratch. Discretion, essentiality, controlled weight, limited footprint, measured costs, and quality are the new philosophy. RnrnAnd I relinquished (aptly) to a full frame (for the aforementioned philosophy), I was oriented to an a6300, having already used Sony's mirrorless past ... and it would have been a wise choice with still some compatible accessories. What made me desist is the optical park, with which I have never had a particular feeling (and I'm not a vintage fanboy). Rnrn ... And so I got engaged with this x-t20, whose quality adds a choice of goals closer to my taste. rnrnThe aesthetic is eye-catching, robust, pleasing: when you ride you do the same as the old fashioned photographer's taste, and you light up the "navigated one". This also returns aits certain "why" .rnrnE 'small, very small, with all the pros and cons of the case. Transportation is no longer a problem: back pain, tiredness, laziness in the face of the prospect of taking on the equivalent of an armament are forgotten. It's just a small bag and you remember to have it right when you need it. This little thing, however, adversely affects the grip, at least in my case. Compared to Sony's mirrorless, this Fuji finds it ergonomically uncomfortable. I've associated a hand grip to make the handle more secure and easy. The files that it's working are wonderfully workable and the name of the x-trans is also to be under the torture of my post production.rnrnEvf, with which in the past had several problems (those of the first mirrorlesss made me headaches), it has become usable despite my acute photosensitivity and for now I have no side effects. The LCD screen is very enjoyable and of good definition. Its tilting may be useful in some situations. RnrnThe battery lasts long lasting. In my case it means little, because I pick the photos before taking them, and instead of 350 I take 25 ... but a couple of extra batteries really cost nothing and it's a no-problem. RnrnThe touch screen gives added value to the convenience of some settings, which can be quicker and more immediate. rnrnThrough the shutter button I added a vane button with concave surface: with the native button I did not find the correct balance, even in the hands posture.rnrnL'af i ho tested only with the Fujinon 35 mm f / 1.4, with which it probably can not express itself to the full of its qualities. In any case, it brings home what it is about to capture in one way or another. It is an expensive "toy" that deserves to be part of the kit of those who want to move light, discreet and with quality. sent on October 31, 2017 |
 | Sony A6000 Pros: Dimensions, weight, ergonomics, speed autofocus sensor, tilting LCD, burst, viewfinder, Cons: Low number of objectives aps-c, it lacks the electronic level Opinion: Having an A7 I wanted to combine this complementary body as a6000. Fortunately, the old-style menu Nex has been replaced by the one already present on the mirrorless FF, gaining intuitive, operating speed and completezza.rnrnIl camera body looks small, light and robust, features that transmits vibrations of pleasure when handling it. rnPer my hands, medium in size, ergonomics is excellent and the controls placed in affordable points after a minimum of 16-50 propedeutica.rnrnCon attacked the camera do the rest in the space of a compact, even if the ' lens kit not represent certain quality standards of value, allows you to cover the most common focal unnoticed. rnrnIl vaunted autofocus is actually handsome. Although it may be inevitably influenced by the characteristics of the lens attached, it is easy to notice the ease of coupling even in situations where light is not too favorable and 179 points maf I seem to be sufficient for more than un'o26ugrave; suited to meet the needs of the new sensors, except for the excellent and cheap 50mm OSS. We remain confident in attesa.rnrnLa gust, who served ... it's a real reflex.rnrnIl finder does not miss the optical viewfinder so the picture looks real. During fast motion lag is perceptible but not annoying, but not a negative influence on the time of scatto.rnrnLo tilting screen, which I learned to use with satisfaction on the A7, it is a godsend on many occasions and I could not help it more less. Unfortunately it is not including the electronic level and those who, like me, routinely uses it, it could be an absence annoying. You have to make do with the different lines given by the grid selectable menu.rnrnPer who may have difficulty traveling or charging recommend one or two batteries (charged) to riserva.rnrnComodo the wi-fi and NFC for those who love fast sharing. rnrnInutile recall the possibility to mount the entire world of photography through rings you adattatori.rnrnInI heard At the a6000 camera body suitable for all palates, even the most demanding. The relatively low cost can make it palatable advanced amateurs looking for lightness, discretion and ease of use without sacrificing the quality of a sensor that, when combined with the right lens, can bring more of a reflex forced to stay in the cabinet kit. It 'an all-rounder camera that if you do not need to tropicalizzazioni various specialty or niche, you will want to always have with you. Consigliata.rn sent on May 28, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM II Pros: Sharpness, versatility, tropicalization, weight, balance, accuracy and speed AF, low noise. Cons: Price, diameter filters Opinion: I'm more a fan of super-bright LEDs that fixed the zoom, but with this new Canon 24-70 has reached a quality that convinced me to buy. RnrnNon have the magical tone bokeh 50 L or 85 mm f / 1.2, but for those looking for a practical all-rounder by the sharpness of more than 24 mm tse (at the same focal length) and 70-200 f / 2.8 II (70 mm), this will not disappoint 24-70 . rnrnRispetto its predecessor the weight seems more balanced (I like to feel) and aesthetically less invasive, thanks to the new paraluce.rnrnIl hood is designed with the trigger button type 70-200 f / 2,8 II, which makes it easy and practical engagement. rnrnCostruttivamente is solid and pleasant to tatto.rnrnL 'AF is very fast, quiet and precise even in poor conditions luce.rnrnA find the same focal length 24 mm f / 1.4 L II even more nel'immagine which gives, for both distortion and for contrast and color, but nothing that significantly affect foto.rnrnIl bokeh 70 mm is a little sterile for my habits, theymild perhaps due to its being devoted to extreme sharpness. To create the most magical atmosphere we still use 85 mm or 50 mm diameter filters mm.rnrn82 (for those who use them) places greater emphasis on the economic effort that already when purchasing lens reveals dissanguante. However, it is a purchase that is amortized over time, both for the duration of use, both for the quality offered by the prodotto.rnrnIo use as optical reportage and travel, for outputs disengaged, but also for confirmations, communions and assignments vari.rnPerfetto companion for those who want to move with a single optical or otherwise leggero.rnrnPerfetto for FF cameras. On aps-c, losing the wide side, I find it a little 'wasted. sent on November 27, 2012 |
 | Canon EF 85mm f/1.2 L II USM Pros: The best portrait lens available. Sharpest already at full aperture. Blurred pasty and three-dimensionality without equal. Chromaticity worthy of his fame. Also aesthetically beautiful. Cons: AF slow, but there is a reason (explained in review). And 'heavy, but well balanced and personally I do not feel fatigue. The minimum distance of 95 cm MAF is a lot, but it helps to keep in focus both eyes even at full apetura. The only two real flaws are the high price and the extension outside of a couple of inches shorter distances. I would have preferred a movement as entirely within the 50 mm f / 1.2. Opinion: Construction: Compact, rugged and all that fat in his round one pound of weight. When you hold her in his hands grasp at all and for all its size L, and there is even of aesthetic appeal, visual grandeur and sense of pleasure when handling it. From the building immediately understands that the lens is designed for portraiture: the ring of MAF, in fact, it is soft and ideally suited to manual focus, intercorrendo plenty of space between different adjustment notches, so as to have maximum precision and easier to manage in the MAF manual. It 'is therefore understandable why the AF is not an arrow, since the movement is wider than other optics. If then we hope that the engine has to move an entire group Gauss (at least I think I have understood so) it is justified by itself. In my view, therefore, it is not correct to say that the AF is slow, but it is "reflective", ie designed for genus shooting very specific. Unfortunately, the AF movement is not only internal, but, at the minimum distance of MAF, the barrel protrudes a couple of inches. Do not bother, but I would have preferred a movement only internal, such as the 50 mm f / 1.2. A curiosity: the focus ring to focus only works with the camera turned on. Weight: Here the only objective thing is the number and its unit of measurement: 1 pound round one. To be honest it can be frightening. I myself, before buying, I was very hesitant also because of this "ingredient". I must say, though, that was more scared than anything else. I brought this to the neck 85 mm for at least 4 hours, walking in the city at a steady pace and I felt tired or contraindications more or different than other standard optical L. The weight is well balanced and not bulky size makes it very manageable when it is in motion, perhaps with the support of a hand to be lighter on the back and neck. I found it verybut much more unmanageable the 24-70 L, whose ingombranza hindered my movements. This speech, however, must be interpreted according to the hand of the writer: male, young, with good muscle tone. I think that a woman, perhaps in minute size, would certainly another judgment in this regard and would be far greater difficulty in managing the weight of the barrel. Images and bokeh: In general, the lens finds its vocation in the early plans, activities performed with excellence will ever get the chance to meet with other lenses. It 'something that I hypothesize, but known as the minimum focus distance (95 cm) allows you to take a close-up f / 1.2 without incurring the unfortunate problem of having one eye in focus and the other does not. These images, for example, were taken at 90 cm at the maximum opening (1, 2, 3). The item that is spread throughout the network for which the 5D Mark II the focus is impossible to find absolutely misleading. It 'clear that you can not expectto focus a perfectly eye to 7 meters away f / 1.2, but this is evident for a physical factor. It 'true that the AF on the 7D is more handsome, but this happens with all lenses, not only with the 85 mm. The thing I wonder the most is the extraordinary focus that gives: mellow, warm, incredibly three-dimensional. It seems to me that the lens is able to create beautiful tonal contrasts and a reading light is very faithful to reality, so that in pp interventions could be reduced to the minimum wage. Sharpness, detail and smoothness are the flagships of a lens that can hold its own already at full aperture and an optical perfection is already at f / 1.4, up to f / 8. At f/11 I seem to notice some diffraction, but here I leave to those in the know far more than me and specialized sites. Interior and exterior: Needless to say that working indoors with this objective, instills a sense of humor. Allows you to play beautifully with the light, even freehand mantenenincredibly doses in times of safety and, therefore, avoiding the rough, without pumping the iso oversized. For those, like me, loves to work openings extreme is some difficulty in sunny days, which is not enough 1/8000 to take without overexposing wide. A filter NDx2 is perhaps a solution to the discomfort. Conclusions: The 85 mm f / 1.2 costs and costs much. It 'sublime performance perspective, but also niche. Hardly be used for purposes other than portraiture or creative photos, however, these days, I have also used the street. The 50 mm f / 1.2 is, from this point of view, far more versatile, thanks also to an AF more manageable in most situations. The purchase of a similar goal, therefore, is recommended only for professionals or advanced amateur portrait, especially love that photo in the foreground, I think the purpose for which it was designed. For the half-length is already well on 50 mm. That said posI finally throw in the state a very full satisfaction from every point of view, despite the price turns out to be, in my view, too. --- Www.pdbzone.com sent on March 03, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
