|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Luca Castellani www.juzaphoto.com/p/LucaCastellani  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: Price, stabilizer excellent, crisp and clear TA, handyman for many occasions. Cons: Weight, in some panoramic photos I noticed nuances of the blue-green Opinion: After reading the opinions in the various posts on the site, I finally proceeded to the purchase. Recatomi in the store (the one advertised here too), with 300 € I could know our capabilities this lens Tamron.rnCome reiterated by other readers 70-300 is very solid, does not stretch and lowering the weight but feels We get used to. (D90 + Tele = 1570 g.) RnHo made several tests and the results impressed me: in nature photos in the plants I noticed a good sharpness, bokeh sometimes amazed me, considering that I was used to Nikon fixed 35mm 1.8rnLo zoom with stabilizer responds sublime, I worked very wide open and no pictures move, even though I were in positions not very solide.rnL'apertura F4 did not disappoint me, I shot at night in the street and I can say that if it were not for some of the parameters I had set wrong, the photos have managed benissimo.rnLa color rendering is excellent and fairly faithful, although in some cases I noticed some strange shades of blue, perhaps my mistake in post produzione.rnDi macro if it can not do, but "croppando" on some shots of flowers, I could get good magnification of particolari.rnLeggevo the difficulty of some readers in focus on subjects against dark backgrounds, like a bird on a plant: in fact I had the same problem a few times, but this depended on the shooting conditions negative, counter-light or low light. Spostandomi side I could work around problema.rnScegliendo the diaphragm and suitable setting of the day ISO 200 and 800 in the evening, I managed to make the shots more than satisfactory. In broad daylight with light lens from the best of himself. The evening logically forced to use high iso and other artifizi.rnSicuramente a lens with this super low price is recommended. I have tested in all TA from the balcony of the house photographing the chimneys of nearby houses, with amazement I enlarged the photo and the result was amazing, you could see clearly the details of the chimney, as seen in the test between the Nikon 70-200 and that theNo oggetto.rnSolo in some details I noticed a sharpness lower than the Nikon 35 mm, but this is what has to be a handyman 70 mm. without rancor comunque.rnLo advice for those who do not want to pay high figures and at the same time want a good tele home Tamron.rnBuona seratarn sent on August 12, 2015 |
 | Nikon D90 Pros: Compact controls on the camera body, excellent to combine with a fixed lens. Solid and reliable, despite the thousands of shots, I have never encountered difficulties or crash by the software that manages the recovery. Good post production and opportunity 'to work in HDR. The price paid a few years ago (€ 850 for the body only) is not 'far from the new evaluations, whereas this reflex is not' more 'in produzione.rnAdatta beginners and more: a good understanding of the controls applicable permits make shots even higher new and noble reflex that offer many mega pixels compared to this modello.rnPer what concerns me a great purchase. Cons: The iso are rated minimum value of 200, 100 iso is unfortunate that the value can only be reached by setting L1 in the settings, and from what I understand it would be nothing more than a simulation software and not really optical and real. However this' does not constitute a serious problem, the sharpness and 'assured even at 200 ISO, and the "noise" is heard by raising the ISO value after a certain value, I think after the 800.rnIl built-in flash and not' very powerful, the 'I used very little, and now with a fixed 1.8 meno.rnNulla still more to challenge this "old lady" rn Opinion: In defiinitiva it applies paid. Some say that unlike the rival Canon shots in a more 'cool. In fact it seems to me that takes to overexpose, but acting on the balance is remedied immediately. Certainly with the commands to immediate grip on the body and the thousand customizations, it looks like a semi-professional SLR, not a toy from principiante.rnSe then add a bright lens and quality of 'the machine from the best of herself, sicuramento with 18-55 vr II provided it can not 'expect much. A quantum leap 'I did it by combining it with a fixed 35mm 1.8G.rnBuona and recommended even if used, because now and' discontinued. sent on May 12, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 G VR II Pros: Lightness and ease of use Cons: Paid 150 euro with the purchase of my SLR, although even today's price is still almost unchanged. Opinion: It 'a plasticone, useful and handy in many occasions. Unfortunately at night or in low light, it forces him to do somersaults to get a good shot. Despite the presence of the stabilizer, with a long time it happened to me several times to meet blur. As sharpness is sufficient, I do not find exceptional as read in other posts. I made some macro (using the appropriate command on the ring) and the result was not bad, but even eccelso.rnMi sorry to note the difference observed with the purchase of fixed Nikon 35mm 1.8G, that despite the equal price (150 euro ) showed a sharper both diaphragms open and closed: I put in the box with the Nikon 18-55 and the new drive I discovered a new world and way of fotografare.rnLuca - Verona sent on May 11, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
